This entire article is a major spoiler for Inception. Please do not read it until you’ve experienced Christopher Nolan’s film for yourself.
Every single moment of Inception is a dream. I think that in a couple of years this will become the accepted reading of the film, and differing interpretations will have to be skillfully argued to be even remotely considered. The film makes this clear, and it never holds back the truth from audiences. Some find this idea to be narratively repugnant, since they think that a movie where everything is a dream is a movie without stakes, a movie where the audience is wasting their time.
Except that this is exactly what Nolan is arguing against. The film is a metaphor for the way that Nolan as a director works, and what he’s ultimately saying is that the catharsis found in a dream is as real as the catharsis found in a movie is as real as the catharsis found in life. Inception is about making movies, and cinema is the shared dream that truly interests the director.
I believe that Inception is a dream to the point where even the dream-sharing stuff is a dream. Dom Cobb isn’t an extractor. He can’t go into other people’s dreams. He isn’t on the run from the Cobol Corporation. At one point he tells himself this, through the voice of Mal, who is a projection of his own subconscious. She asks him how real he thinks his world is, where he’s being chased across the globe by faceless corporate goons.
She asks him that in a scene that we all know is a dream, but Inception lets us in on this elsewhere. Michael Caine’s character implores Cobb to return to reality, to wake up. During the chase in Mombasa, Cobb tries to escape down an alleyway, and the two buildings between which he’s running begin closing in on him – a classic anxiety dream moment. When he finally pulls himself free he finds Ken Watanabe’s character waiting for him, against all logic. Except dream logic.
Much is made in the film about totems, items unique to dreamers that can be used to tell when someone is actually awake or asleep. Cobb’s totem is a top, which spins endlessly when he’s asleep, and the fact that the top stops spinning at many points in the film is claimed by some to be evidence that Cobb is awake during those scenes. The problem here is that the top wasn’t always Cobb’s totem – he got it from his wife, who killed herself because she believed that they were still living in a dream. There’s more than a slim chance that she’s right – note that when Cobb remembers her suicide she is, bizarrely, sitting on a ledge opposite the room they rented. You could do the logical gymnastics required to claim that Mal simply rented another room across the alleyway, but the more realistic notion here is that it’s a dream, with the gap between the two lovers being a metaphorical one made literal. When Mal jumps she leaves behind the top, and if she was right about the world being a dream, the fact that it spins or doesn’t spin is meaningless. It’s a dream construct anyway. There’s no way to use the top as a proof of reality.
Watching the film with this eye you can see the dream logic unfolding. As is said in the movie, dreams seem real in the moment and it’s only when you’ve woken up that things seem strange. The film’s ‘reality’ sequences are filled with moments that, on retrospect, seem strange or unlikely or unexplained. Even the basics of the dream sharing technology is unbelievably vague, and I don’t think that’s just because Nolan wants to keep things streamlined. It’s because Cobb’s unconscious mind is filling it in as he goes along.
There’s more, but I would have to watch the film again with a notebook to get all the evidence (all of it in plain sight). The end seems without a doubt to be a dream – from the dreamy way the film is shot and edited once Cobb wakes up on the plane all the way through to him coming home to find his two kids in the exact position and in the exact same clothes that he kept remembering them, it doesn’t matter if the top falls, Cobb is dreaming.
That Cobb is dreaming and still finds his catharsis (that he can now look at the face of his kids) is the point. It’s important to realize that Inception is a not very thinly-veiled autobiographical look at how Nolan works. In a recent red carpet interview, Leonardo DiCaprio – who was important in helping Nolan get the script to the final stages – compares the movie not to The Matrix or some other mindfuck movie but Fellini’s 8 1/2. This is probably the second most telling thing DiCaprio said during the publicity tour for the film, with the first being that he based Cobb on Nolan. 8 1/2 is totally autobiographical for Fellini, and it’s all about an Italian director trying to overcome his block and make a movie (a science fiction movie, even). It’s a film about filmmaking, and so is Inception.
The heist team quite neatly maps to major players in a film production. Cobb is the director while Arthur, the guy who does the research and who sets up the places to sleep, is the producer. Ariadne, the dream architect, is the screenwriter – she creates the world that will be entered. Eames is the actor (this is so obvious that the character sits at an old fashioned mirrored vanity, the type which stage actors would use). Yusuf is the technical guy; remember, the Oscar come from the Academy of Motion Picture Arts and Sciences, and it requires a good number of technically minded people to get a movie off the ground. Nolan himself more or less explains this in the latest issue of Film Comment, saying ‘There are a lot of striking similarities [between what the team does and the putting on of a major Hollywood movie]. When for instance the team is out on the street they’ve created, surveying it, that’s really identical with what we do on tech scouts before we shoot.’
That leaves two key figures. Saito is the money guy, the big corporate suit who fancies himself a part of the game. And Fischer, the mark, is the audience. Cobb, as a director, takes Fischer through an engaging, stimulating and exciting journey, one that leads him to an understanding about himself. Cobb is the big time movie director (or rather the best version of that – certainly not a Michael Bay) who brings the action, who brings the spectacle, but who also brings the meaning and the humanity and the emotion.
The movies-as-dreams aspect is part of why Inception keeps the dreams so grounded. In the film it’s explained that playing with the dream too much alerts the dreamer to the falseness around him; this is just another version of the suspension of disbelief upon which all films hinge. As soon as the audience is pulled out of the movie by some element – an implausible scene, a ludicrous line, a poor performance – it’s possible that the cinematic dream spell is broken completely, and they’re lost.
As a great director, Cobb is also a great artist, which means that even when he’s creating a dream about snowmobile chases, he’s bringing something of himself into it. That’s Mal. It’s the auterist impulse, the need to bring your own interests, obsessions and issues into a movie. It’s what the best directors do. It’s very telling that Nolan sees this as kind of a problem; I suspect another filmmaker might have cast Mal as the special element that makes Cobb so successful.
Inception is such a big deal because it’s what great movies strive to do. You walk out of a great film changed, with new ideas planted in your head, with your neural networks subtly rewired by what you’ve just seen. On a meta level Inception itself does this, with audiences leaving the theater buzzing about the way it made them feel and perceive. New ideas, new thoughts, new points of view are more lasting a souvenir of a great movie than a ticket stub.
It’s possible to view Fischer, the mark, as not the audience but just as the character that is being put through the movie that is the dream. To be honest, I haven’t quite solidified my thought on Fischer’s place in the allegorical web, but what’s important is that the breakthrough that Fischer has in the ski fortress is real. Despite the fact that his father is not there, despite the fact that the pinwheel was never by his father’s bedside, the emotions that Fischer experiences are 100 percent genuine. It doesn’t matter that the movie you’re watching isn’t a real story, that it’s just highly paid people putting on a show – when a movie moves you, it truly moves you. The tears you cry during Up are totally real, even if absolutely nothing that you see on screen has ever existed in the physical world.
For Cobb there’s a deeper meaning to it all. While Cobb doesn’t have daddy issues (that we know of), he, like Fischer, is dealing with a loss. He’s trying to come to grips with the death of his wife*; Fischer’s journey reflects Cobb’s while not being a complete point for point reflection. That’s important for Nolan, who is making films that have personal components – that talk about things that obviously interest or concern him – but that aren’t actually about him. Other filmmakers (Fellini) may make movies that are thinly veiled autobiography, but that’s not what Nolan or Cobb are doing. The movies (or dreams) they’re putting together reflect what they’re going through but aren’t easily mapped on to them. Talking to Film Comment, Nolan says he has never been to psychoanalysis. ‘I think I use filmmaking for that purpose. I have a passionate relationship to what I do.’
In a lot of ways Inception is a bookend to last summer’s Inglorious Basterds. In that film Quentin Tarantino celebrated the ways that cinema could change the world, while in Inception Nolan is examining the ways that cinema, the ultimate shared dream, can change an individual. The entire film is a dream, within the confines of the movie itself, but in a more meta sense it’s Nolan’s dream. He’s dreaming Cobb, and finding his own moments of revelation and resolution, just as Cobb is dreaming Fischer and finding his own catharsis and change.
The whole film being a dream isn’t a cop out or a waste of time, but an ultimate expression of the film’s themes and meaning. It’s all fake. But it’s all very, very real. And that’s something every single movie lover understands implicitly and completely.
* it’s really worth noting that if you accept that the whole movie is a dream that Mal may not be dead. She could have just left Cobb. The mourning that he is experiencing deep inside his mind is no less real if she’s alive or dead – he has still lost her.
i love the film best of year, actually best film of the last 5 years maybe, i have to say the tokem for me is really the big thing it's telling us what it is, the fact that we didnt see it stop in the bathroom spinning onto the floor & then when he is showing the girl tells me he isnt home that we all just peek inside of his head, trying to get out of limbo, setting up the one last job to get himslef home simply because he wants to with all his heart, yet his mind wont let him for the guilt over Mal death. i love this movie!
guys i heard on radio1 that there is an underlying twist that is given away during the 1st 15 minutes of the movie which casts a whole new outlook to the plot…but i for sure dont get it!
Devin, i agree 100 percent with your article. I came up with a theory. i dont know if it has already been given, but i'd like to explain either way from a filmmaker's point of view…
first of all i want to make it clear, i JUST finished watching Inception, and with my own conclusions, i quickly jumped online to look for others…
what I believe, is that the movie is ALL a dream. Let's start from the end first. Cobb wakes up, looks at the rest of his "crew", but everyone is giving him a symphatic look. no words is said even though they have JUST gotten out of a crazy reality-like dream…you would think that they would say something to each other (specially since Cobb came back from his limbo, something he mentioned early in the movie took so long to come back from…which leads me to my next point…the idea of all 3 levels, works like a clock. level 1(dream) symbolizes HOURS..level 2(dream within a dream) symbolizes MINUTES..and level 3(inception) well of course SECONDS. Now, the reason i say this is because, the flight took 10 hours or so right? yet when Cobb woke up, the flight attendant said there was 20 minutes before reaching destination..(real quick, remember that when Ariadne shoots Mal, Cobb yelled at her for interrupting what he had planned, causing a shortage in time because Mal died before she was supposed to)..now back to the CLOCK IDEA…Notice how in every level, the time is slower than the previous..now use that with the COUNTDOWN music they are given to wake up..when the van was falling into the water as their escape kick..it took FOREVER to hit the water. the countdown music symbolizes a countdown clock set to, let's say, 10 hours. the HOURS will go by REAL SLOW (Inception)..and since everything in our dream happens faster than in reality, it explains my point of view..
so as Cobb wakes up from a LONG 10 hours flight, he has dreamed a WHOLE movie. With the passengers being dreamed as his crew. Leaving me to believe that Nolan is Cobb, and he dreamed this movie while he was sound asleep.
I know how that feels like. A few night ago, i had a dream my friend had killed one of our friends, and i helped him cover up. While being chased by a whole army, jumping off of cliffs, and driving at fast speed. When I woke up, i couldnt remember where it had started, but i knew the middle and end. When i saw inception tonight, i got goosebumps because of the similarities of my dream. Leading me to think thorougly about my dream. Now i know why everything fits. US being chased by an Army, can only come from him being in the Military, and my soon leave to boot camp. The fast driving, comes from my love for cars and speed chases. and jumpin off of cliffs, is my obssesion for the thrills of adventure & being crazy for trying new things without worrying…
there you have it. let me know what you guys make of this…MAYBE I'M JUST CRAZY LOL
If the end scene is a dream then that means that the wife was right and she would have woken up in reality after she killed herself. If this is the case then why wouldn't she have woken up her husband? Therefore the end scene must be reality.
<a href=http://amortgagedirect.com/>order viagra</a> q#(%vpq#,<a href=http://hammelmachineproducts.com/>buy viagra</a> =–00, <a href=http://pailumtaichi.com/>over the counter viagara pills</a> V5Qq3,<a href=http://chateaudedanzay.com/>buy viagra online</a> i(%q#m%,<a href=http://liverpoolblogg.com/>viagra 150 online</a> w)($^{,<a href=http://loversfromhell.com/>buy viagra generic</a> V5Qq3,<a href=http://candymaijala.com/>viagra pro</a> (qw#u%)q,<a href=http://cumnockrugby.com/>buy viagra online</a> %Q#B#QC#,<a href=http://www.ctvideoimaging.com/>canada viagra</a> #%M,<a href=http://www.senoldelibas.com/>viagra order</a> q#(%mqp,<a href=http://www.pathofthymesoaps.com/>viagra shop</a> %m*qmc,
re #744 the end scene could still be a dream if Cobb and Saito never made it out of limbo; accoring to the chemist the only way out was the kick; if Cobb remembered that he could have jumped off of a building or something but during his talk with the old Saito, Cobb seemed a bit confused to me
Although I partially agree with your thesis, to me the plot was very simple.
Cobb is a businessman flying from Sydney to L.A…..during his trip, he falls asleep and dreams up this story of being an agent who hacks people's dreams. In the process, the characters he incorporates into the story are merely other first-class passengers on his flight. He doesn't know them first-hand.
Throughout his dream, we can see Cobb still grieving over the loss of his wife, who apparently was manic-depressive and committed suicide. The meaning of his children in the dream, is a manifestion of his longing to see them again, after being away for so long.
At the end of the end of the film, he wakes up startled and confused at having dreamt such a crazy story. The other passengers merely stare at him with amusement…..just like anyone would after being woken up 20 minutes before landing.
To sum it all up, your thesis is right for the most part, but the ending is real. He comes home to be picked up by his father-in-law and reunites w/ his children.
People can look for a deeper meaning….but that was my take on it.
“The other passengers merely stare at him with amusement…..just like anyone would after being woken up 20 minutes before landing. ”
Actually, you’ll notice they do look at each other much longer than strangers would. And Arthur smiles and shakes his head a bit when he looks at Cobb. And we see Saito make the phone call, presumably to immigration, like he said he would should the inception be a success!! They are most obviously not strangers to each other! Except for Fischer. We don’t see him look at the others much at all.
<a href=http://amortgagedirect.com/>viagra 100 mg</a> %#&^vc#%vq,<a href=http://hammelmachineproducts.com/>viagra pills</a> q#%m*q_c<q, <a href=http://pailumtaichi.com/>generic viagra online</a> –09,<a href=http://chateaudedanzay.com/>blue pill viagra</a> %Q#V%,<a href=http://liverpoolblogg.com/>viagra pills</a> v$^%&vw,<a href=http://loversfromhell.com/>cheap generic viagra online</a> q3,<a href=http://candymaijala.com/>viagra buy online</a> (#m%vq,<a href=http://cumnockrugby.com/>cheap viagra pills</a> ^v%&#$bqv#,<a href=http://www.ctvideoimaging.com/>viagra online sales</a> A^v,<a href=http://www.senoldelibas.com/>viagra 150 online</a> 045Mq,<a href=http://www.pathofthymesoaps.com/>viagra sale online</a> q)#%m{q,
I just book marked your blog on Digg and StumbleUpon.I enjoy reading your commentaries.
I'm not privy to themes in dreams and the meanings behind certain phenomena or perceptions that occur in them. But is there one for people repeating the same things over and over? Quite a few of Saito and Cobb's dialogue are repeated through the film, especially the 'old man waiting to die alone' line.
Yes, the lines that Saito and Cobb say to each other are repeated throughout the movie. This is because even if you don’t catch the ‘hidden meanings’ behind all the symbols, you still understand (at the end of the movie) how important it was for them to meet again on the lower level in order for the whole plan to be a success.
just dreamed film tonight..Great piece of writing here. Nolan dreams…but who is the one that dreams?
..or in other words..the film is watched AS the dream..the film seems to end..yet the dream never begun..and the dreamer still dreams on…
its all a dream..that's the 'point' –spin your tops…..row, row, row your boat
If that sounds like a load of shit..it's a load of shit..whatever comes up is
Yeah well the kids wear the same cloth in the end as the flash backs..the wed. rings on during dreams only.. sound of topping in ending.. this movie's a double standard in more than many ways.. mainly points to dream all the movie but? itz a damn good movie just watched it on DVD
I loved it. As simple as that. And, why do we think we waste time watching a movie about a dream stating it's fake? Aren't the majority of movies based on fake events?
1) Great Movie
2) Great Interpretation by Devin
3) Great Comments and Interpretations by all the John Q. Publics!
Personally interpret the plot as occurring completely within a dream – but whose dream? Enjoy Devin's interpretation of the movie as a comment on movie making and cinema. Guess many Film 101 classes will be discussing this one for a long time to come!
Totally fits… Here's a few thoughts of my own to add…
Yusuf(Joseph the "Dream" interpreter from Bible script) has a den where people come to be "drugged" and "dream share"… "Not to sleep but wake" Yusuf says… exactly as people who go to cinemas… Also, his drug fools the eyes but doesn't fool the ear (we can still listen for clues even though our eyes are fooled by what we see!)
My take on the totems are this… The Director(Nolan) knows the movie industry is "battling" hard to get audiences to spend their money on seeing their costly-to-make films… they battle against many other "distractions" that the world can give us… We see three totems in the movie… all are "symbolic"… The Spinning Top represents toy and games… The Chess Piece represents pastimes and hobbies… The Dice represents Gambling… All three "distract" the consumer from spending their cash to watch movies… The Director (Cobb) is continually watching for the totems to fall because that will mean his movie is a success… The "wobble" of the spinning top signifies that the film has "dented" the continual struggle against these other forms of entertainment but not "defeated" them… Cobb purposely knocks the tomem over in Yusuf's den so Saito can not see it continually spinning and maybe withdraw his funding
At the start.. Taito (The financer of the movie) had to be convinced by Cobb (The Scriptwriter.. Nolan wrote the script) to invest in his SCRIPT which he was trying to put into Saito's safe(Inception of HIS ideas)… Mal destroys the illusion but they transport into a second dream and Saito is not fooled because the texture of the carpet is not what he expected so they abort that dream too!!… Nash(The Scriptwriter for THAT dream) was told off and subsequently taken off by Saito's goons and replaced by a "better" Scriptwriter in Ariadne
Later, Saito insists that he wants to be included in the inception (As all investors would want to see how their money is being spent)… He confirms his financier position by buying the airline!!!
Saito was the only one shot and injured when they were in the van… being the "Financier" his bleeding would represent a loss of his investment as the movie moved along and was being "created"… they continue to take the bleeding Saito to other levels even though they could have left him as he had no purpose in the illusion!
Saito has grown old in Limbo but Cobb has not??… symbolic of how an investor would be "aging" and "worried" in a "not knowing" state as to whether his investment has been a worthwhile???… He is waiting for the Director(Cobb) to come and free him from his torment by giving him the good news and ending his Limboic state… Cobb gives him the good news and says he is gonna take him back… They all awake on the plane "HAPPY" because their illusion viewed by Fischer(The audience) has been a success and they all played their part in it… They "knowingly" acknowledge eachother with a nod but Fischer is still unaware that these people have been instumentral in his "self satisfying" dream… Much like the audience is stimulated by a movie but do not necessarily know the people who "created" the illusion!
I have a few other "bits" to add but wil do so at another time perhaps??… This is so intriguing and mind stimulating… no other movie has created this kind of thought provoking dialogus… Great film… Great analysis Devin
The whole theory of ‘the entire movie is a dream’ makes logical sense, but not from Mal’s point of view. It’s obvious that Mal can’t convince herself that she is awake. Cobb understands that she can’t be convinced that she is awake. So, according to the architecture of dreams and embedded dreams, why do we see Mal at the lower levels AFTER she has jumped out the window?
The answer is because Mal is a projection of Cobbs subconcious. She is not in limbo. She did not kill herself while dreaming when she jumped out the window. She is dead. We know this because Cobb can access her projection whenever he likes. Mal didn’t leave him, because there’s no motive for that. He also shows Ariadne the room where he and Mal celebrate their anniversary. Cobbs totem was Mals totem. She left it behind. If she was still dreaming, then she would be able to use it. The only time we see her using it is when she puts it in her little safe in the lower level. The last time Mal touched the totem was in the hotel room. She left it on the floor after she trashed the place.
We all know the skill behing Nolan’s work. We all know (or should know by now) the feeling of waking from a dream, getting up out of bed, walking to the kitchen – the bathroom – the living room – only to realize we are still dreaming! Then we find we are still lying on the bed! I’ve been through this many times. I know the confusion and the frustration of getting up out of bed many times until I am finally awake.
But in this story we clearly see the start points and end points. Saito has a motive. Cobb has a motive. Cobol has a motive. Remember when Cobb talks to his kids on the phone that night? Remember when his top falls on the floor in the bathroom under Yusuf’s lab? Remember when Cobb is running from the Cobol hitmen after meeting with Eames, and he has to struggle to get between the two buildings in the alleyway (you’ll find alot of misaligned buildings in that town, due to poor construction standards). Remember the flight attendant who activates the machine for the whole team? Was she part of the team? Or was she paid to push the button? Of course she was paid! She was not dreaming.
So the whole movie is not a dream. But most of it clearly is.
A dream within a dream. A clever puzzle.
I'm so glad I read this. It's a great analysis and beautiful done
if you listen closely, at the end, the top falls, you can hear it. plus the top is wobbly which in a dream would spin smoothly.
Cobb is lost in a dream. You all forgot about the maze… Good luck.
The clothes the children at the end are wearing are different. Plus Michael Caine has said that whenever he is on screen it is the real world as it is him who created the dream. Mindbending.
A couple of observations, sans any conclusions. I’ll let you folks analyze it. These are not in any particular order.
When Leo goes to see the grandfather in Paris, Caine tells Leo to design the levels himself and Leo says “Mal won’t let me” to which Caine replies “Come back to reality, Dom.”
When they go see the chemist to look for custom sedatives, the old man says to Leo “The dream has become their reality.” and adds, almost mockingly,” Who are you to say otherwise?”
When Leo is done testing those super-sedatives, he’s washing his face in the mirror. In the reflection of the mirror he sees behind him a curtain covering the window of his building and through the curtain Mal is sitting on a ledge in the window of the building opposite his. He then is so rattled, he tries to spin the token, but he is interrupted and never completes the test of reality. This may be a point where if he wasn’t dreaming before, he might be now.
After the extraction attempt at the beginning of the movie, Leo sits in his hotel room and prepares to shoot himself in the head after spinning his token. The token topples, so he is satisfied that he is actually awake and puts the gun down. Does this mean that the token’s state is a valid indication of reality for the rest of the movie?
When Leo is talking on the phone to his kids, he speaks to the grandmother. When he eventually gets back to the US, he meets the grandfather, but not the grandmother. This leaves a bit of a gap for me. Who is she and what is the significance that she was not around when he got home? Is she some kind of symbol for Mal? The girl says during the conversation “Grandmother says you’re never coming back.” And the girl’s voice sounds like a 9 or 10 year old, certainly not like the voice of a girl as young as shown on screen. Grandma says “That’s enough kids. Say bye-bye” in a slightly accented voice that sounds young, and Mal-ish. Why does the girl have such an old voice and why does grandmother sound like Mal?
Also, immediately after he put the gun down, the phone rang and it was the kids. He’s a wanted fugitive and they have a hotel and phone number for him??? Pretty interesting timing that the millisecond he puts the gun down, that phone rings. Maybe the token is tainted after all.
These were just a few things that helped me confuse myself further as to whether he was dreaming the entire movie or not.