<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: BOURNE-LESS&#160;LEGACY</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.chud.com/25803/bourne-less-legacy/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.chud.com/25803/bourne-less-legacy/</link>
	<description>Your place for movie news and discussion.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 31 May 2013 14:45:25 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: O-Neg</title>
		<link>http://www.chud.com/25803/bourne-less-legacy/comment-page-1/#comment-87938</link>
		<dc:creator>O-Neg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Oct 2010 15:55:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://chud.com/articles/articles/25803/bourne-less-legacy#comment-87938</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Thank you. Sweet baby Jesus, thank you. Now the originals won&#039;t be tainted.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank you. Sweet baby Jesus, thank you. Now the originals won&#039;t be tainted.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jonesy</title>
		<link>http://www.chud.com/25803/bourne-less-legacy/comment-page-1/#comment-87882</link>
		<dc:creator>Jonesy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Oct 2010 03:56:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://chud.com/articles/articles/25803/bourne-less-legacy#comment-87882</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Ohhhh! So the guy whose scripts were re-written left and right in the trilogy has been put in charge now. Yeah, makes no fucking sense to me either. Epic fail!

Plus, you know if this movie actually turns out to be good, then there will be a conflict between Gilroy and Greengrass over who directs future installments. Which means even less of a guarantee of Damon returning. Just saying. Epic fail.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ohhhh! So the guy whose scripts were re-written left and right in the trilogy has been put in charge now. Yeah, makes no fucking sense to me either. Epic fail!</p>
<p>Plus, you know if this movie actually turns out to be good, then there will be a conflict between Gilroy and Greengrass over who directs future installments. Which means even less of a guarantee of Damon returning. Just saying. Epic fail.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Enigma1969</title>
		<link>http://www.chud.com/25803/bourne-less-legacy/comment-page-1/#comment-87875</link>
		<dc:creator>Enigma1969</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 10 Oct 2010 21:45:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://chud.com/articles/articles/25803/bourne-less-legacy#comment-87875</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Actually this could be a great idea if done right. The title should remain the same because that&#039;s what the film is about Bourne&#039;s Legacy. Hopefully this will be good. ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Actually this could be a great idea if done right. The title should remain the same because that&#039;s what the film is about Bourne&#039;s Legacy. Hopefully this will be good. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: moviemenace</title>
		<link>http://www.chud.com/25803/bourne-less-legacy/comment-page-1/#comment-87869</link>
		<dc:creator>moviemenace</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 10 Oct 2010 17:01:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://chud.com/articles/articles/25803/bourne-less-legacy#comment-87869</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Gilroy is a bright guy. I trust that he&#039;ll do something interesting with the Bourne concept. There are plenty of elements and characters to branch off of. My only concern is Gilroy easing off the action and turning it into a pure puzzle picture. He needs to keep in mind that the Bourne films are adrenaline rides before anything else.  ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Gilroy is a bright guy. I trust that he&#039;ll do something interesting with the Bourne concept. There are plenty of elements and characters to branch off of. My only concern is Gilroy easing off the action and turning it into a pure puzzle picture. He needs to keep in mind that the Bourne films are adrenaline rides before anything else.  </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: LogynxRunn</title>
		<link>http://www.chud.com/25803/bourne-less-legacy/comment-page-1/#comment-87866</link>
		<dc:creator>LogynxRunn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 10 Oct 2010 16:08:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://chud.com/articles/articles/25803/bourne-less-legacy#comment-87866</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[They should call it Bourne Free. Get it...Bourne Free. Yeah, I crack myself up. ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>They should call it Bourne Free. Get it&#8230;Bourne Free. Yeah, I crack myself up. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cobb</title>
		<link>http://www.chud.com/25803/bourne-less-legacy/comment-page-1/#comment-87863</link>
		<dc:creator>Cobb</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 10 Oct 2010 15:27:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://chud.com/articles/articles/25803/bourne-less-legacy#comment-87863</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This is like making a James Bond film without James Bond in it. It absolutely makes no fucking sense to keep that title if Jason Bourne is nowhere to be found in the film. Stupid!!!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is like making a James Bond film without James Bond in it. It absolutely makes no fucking sense to keep that title if Jason Bourne is nowhere to be found in the film. Stupid!!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Radar</title>
		<link>http://www.chud.com/25803/bourne-less-legacy/comment-page-1/#comment-87861</link>
		<dc:creator>Radar</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 10 Oct 2010 15:02:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://chud.com/articles/articles/25803/bourne-less-legacy#comment-87861</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In the books, &quot;Jason Bourne&quot; is an assassin&#039;s identity used by multiple characters...all of whom went through the same training program as Damon&#039;s Bourne...so Gilroy&#039;s idea probably picks up this element that was left out of the first three movies...]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In the books, &quot;Jason Bourne&quot; is an assassin&#039;s identity used by multiple characters&#8230;all of whom went through the same training program as Damon&#039;s Bourne&#8230;so Gilroy&#039;s idea probably picks up this element that was left out of the first three movies&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: servo</title>
		<link>http://www.chud.com/25803/bourne-less-legacy/comment-page-1/#comment-87857</link>
		<dc:creator>servo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 10 Oct 2010 13:22:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://chud.com/articles/articles/25803/bourne-less-legacy#comment-87857</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Damn, I&#039;m suddenly much less excited about this.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Damn, I&#039;m suddenly much less excited about this.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Towelie McTowel</title>
		<link>http://www.chud.com/25803/bourne-less-legacy/comment-page-1/#comment-87855</link>
		<dc:creator>Towelie McTowel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 10 Oct 2010 12:42:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://chud.com/articles/articles/25803/bourne-less-legacy#comment-87855</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Interesting. I can&#039;t see them changing the title; first, because it&#039;s a big selling point having the Bourne name in the title, and second, because if the story focuses on the repercussions of Bourne&#039;s actions in &quot;Ultimatum&quot;, then &quot;Legacy&quot; would be a completely appropriate title...even if the story didn&#039;t focus directly on the character of Bourne himself. We&#039;ll have to wait to see how this turns out.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting. I can&#039;t see them changing the title; first, because it&#039;s a big selling point having the Bourne name in the title, and second, because if the story focuses on the repercussions of Bourne&#039;s actions in &quot;Ultimatum&quot;, then &quot;Legacy&quot; would be a completely appropriate title&#8230;even if the story didn&#039;t focus directly on the character of Bourne himself. We&#039;ll have to wait to see how this turns out.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Eric</title>
		<link>http://www.chud.com/25803/bourne-less-legacy/comment-page-1/#comment-87854</link>
		<dc:creator>Eric</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 10 Oct 2010 12:19:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://chud.com/articles/articles/25803/bourne-less-legacy#comment-87854</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#039;m suddenly reminded of the movie Cyborg.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#039;m suddenly reminded of the movie Cyborg.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk
Page Caching using disk: enhanced
Database Caching 23/39 queries in 0.014 seconds using disk

 Served from: www.chud.com @ 2013-06-19 02:08:51 by W3 Total Cache -->