My Movie Microscope of Transformers 2: Revenge of the Fallen.
Transformers – Dark of the Moon is a fitting title because it should always be facing away from us.
Wow.
Michael Bay promised us that he’d do away with the problems of the horrendous first sequel to Transformers but he should have mentioned the possibility of creating some new ones. In actuality Transformers – Dark of the Moon isn’t as bad a movie as its Writer’s Strike embattled predecessor but its faults are inherently more noticeable. Partially due to the IMAX/3-D boost that lets us see everything in intrinsic detail and partially because the makers of these films have caused enough visual and sonic injustices that we are punch-drunk and know better. We know better. Yet we go.
Because we like BOOM!
Transformers – Dark of the Moon takes a rather haunting premise [that our moon landing was a cover-up involving a crashed Autobot ship] and deposits layer upon layer of extraneous info on it about a race of living robots whose origins we give fuck all about. The Transformers as a whole are fun for one reason: They look like something we’re familiar with and then suddenly they’re running around like something different and the terrain is getting its ass kicked. Their dying planet is dumb. Their motives are dumb. Their weapons are dumb and most importantly, the people they align themselves with are dumb.
As good as the man is at making pictures move prettily, Bay is that bad at parlaying the goodwill created by his visuals with anything even remotely resembling content. That lack of genuine emotion in these films is actually quite miraculous considering the [seemingly absentee] involvement of the best emotion wrangler in film history, Steven Spielberg. It’s miraculous because of how much inner fire and passion LaBeouf typically brings to his roles. Just a little bit of humanity in these films should allow for the vehicular mayhem to unfold organically but it doesn’t. Worse yet, if these films were designed to be robot porn they fail on that front as well because regardless of how feeble the human element to the movies is, there’s an awful lot of time devoted to the pink fleshy bipeds we give less than a shit about.
Shia LaBeouf’s Sam Witwicky is the most grating pussywhipped leading character in film history. And I like Shia LaBeouf. Sam Witwicky and his horrible family and shitty girlfriends are the worst protagonists in Event Movie history. If Downfall became a tentpole series, the Witwicky clan would still be the worst protagonists. To make matters worse, in the film’s first act we can’t experience a scene with Sam without him being delivered to us with some horrible music playing. Imagine the Aerosmith nightmare from Armageddon only worse and with no real reason for being other than contractual obligation. These little musical interludes are so very BAY that it hurts. It hurts because the little good things in the movie like Alan Tudyk’s crazy assistant and John Malkovich’s overtanned loony simply aren’t enough. The eye candy though plentiful and delivered with a much better sense of geography than in the previous films simply isn’t enough.
There has been a lot of banter about how this third film is the delivery of promise on all of Michael Bay’s talent. That it’s finally the one where everything falls into place.
No it isn’t. It’s the same damn thing only bigger and with more time spent on the set pieces. Yes, things are often pretty cool to look at and there’s no denying that the visual effects department and second unit crews deserve a nice pat on the back for their ability to deliver a truly gorgeous bit of splendor. But it’s still dumber than a puddle. It still is an example of how the Kitchen Sink mentality doesn’t work. It still does nothing to convince us these films wouldn’t have been more fun if it were just robots smashing each other for an hour and a half. If there’s a man alive who’d rather have a two+ hour long movie about a toy line WITH human subplots over a one and a half movie of just robots harming each other, I say that that man needs to be wrapped in cheesecloth and sent into the forest. The sheer force of DUMB against one’s skull in this movie wins the tug of war with the amount of cool stuff onscreen. Actually it’s not even close. Like an arm wrestling match between The Rock and Stephen Hawking.
It’s good to hear Leonard Nimoy’s voice. It’s bad to see that his robot has a Nimoy beard. This is a microcosm of why this film and its ilk are so maddening. It’s cool to see a giant action scene set amidst a skyscraper falling. It’s horrible to watch how ridiculous the execution is, with physics being given a firm rogering and the human characters granted immortality as the scene allows. It’s neat to have a frantic chase as robots pursue heroes on crowded roadways. It’s less neat to see hundreds of innocent commuters ruined casually in the midst of a PG-13 movie based on Hasbro toys. What was glorious in Bad Boys 2 is downright offensive here. Over the course of the entire running time of this film there is an almost admirable juxtaposition of great and horrible decisions. It’s definitely a “damned if you do, damned if you don’t” proposition. Anyone expecting anything more than dumb bombast should know better but anyone willing to coast on it should also consider an appointment with a head doctor.
Transformers – Dark of the Moon is a fitting title because it is akin to the ugliest part of our ass but by golly when we ease our mirror right up to the crack it’s fascinating to stare into. I think Nietzsche said something similar.









It’s really sad because Bay is a guy who’s films I’ve enjoyed over the years. I.e. Transformers 1, Bad Boys 1, Armageddon, The Rock and The Island. The guy can make a fun and memorable movie, but I suppose it comes down to plain business. These movies are obviously tailored for maximum digestibility in the International Market. Dreamworks/Paramount know this, Bay knows this and none of them give a shit what us long-time Transformers fans and Cinephiles think because each movie makes a goddamn BILLION DOLLARS!
“f there’s a man alive who’d rather have a two+ hour long movie about a toy line WITH human subplots over a one and a half movie of just robots harming each other, I say that that man needs to be wrapped in cheesecloth and sent into the forest.”
Fucking beautiful, man. Seriously, I don’t understand the people who still claim that the movie is “fun” even after the terribleness of the movie. By the time I got to that part of the film, I was so exhausted by how bad it had all been, that I just didn’t care at that point.
If this movie was 90 minutes long, I’d totally agree that it would have been a fun ride. But as it stands, DoTM is overwhelming by how awful it is just because of its inhumanely long running time. Fuck you, Michael Bay. Fuck you.
Nick Nunziata, I also would sign on to a…90 minute film of, Autobots vs Decepticons! I am really surprised that there haven’t been…More adaptions of Super Robot Anime. Only Voltron and Robotech have even been rumored.
While I understand the constant gripes throughout these films about the human characters receiving so much face time, it’s hard to think that, if it were reversed, that people would then be belly-aching about there not being enough character development with those who we are supposed to relate to.
Here I was thinking the pretentiousness left with Devin. Movie Microscope? Is this some kind of review? Why not just call it a review instead of “Movie Microsope”. A new type of article created entirely because you guys just don’t like Michael Bay. Yes this movie has a 37% fresh rating at rottentomatoes, but it also has a 90% approval rating by audiences (60,137). That is a website that casual movie goers don’t even know exists, so it just goes to show you… I guess you guys had no problem running every possible article about Transformers to get the site hits. It says a lot about this sites agenda. Way to keep your web cred.
First of all, learn the definition of “Pretentious”. Secondly, I’ve been doing these articles since like ’99. So get your head out of your ass.
The pretension here is that you are presenting a review and calling it Movie Micrscope as if that lends some kind of increased authority to your opinion instead of it just being like any other review on this website, which is exactly what it is. And I quickly searched your site to find you’ve only used this movie microscope nonsense on Red Riding Hood, Bless The Child, oh and surprise surprise Revenge of the Fallen. Its not like you do this every week. Just review the movie and give it a 0.
A 90% approval at a website that converts opinions into math? WOW! That MUST mean quality!
Also, “Movie Microscope” has been around for years.
Also also, if they didn’t like Bay then Nick wouldn’t have called Bad Boys 2 “glorious” right up there in this article.
Also also also, conspiracy theories about site hits are dumb.
What is the difference between Nick not posting a review, just a link to a rating, such as 0/10, and someone going to a website, clicking on a star rating and giving it a 4.4/5 raiting? Obviously it is an opinion.
I haven’t seen this movie and I don’t plan on seeing it because I know I won’t enjoy it. But I don’t spew vitriol about how offensive it is to audiences when it’s pretty obvious that the vast majority of the audience don’t fucking care.
So… a guy who writes opinion pieces on a movie site shouldn’t discuss his opinions on a movie?
Its not an opinion its a bias. The other major sites had theirs reviews up well before last Wednesday when the movie opened. This site however waits until almost a week post release to make comments about it. It reeks of “who the hell does Paramount think they are making US pay for the movie!”.
The same thing happened last year with that godawful Prince of Persia movie. This site runs countless articles about it, but when its time to review it, zip, nothing, no comment about the movie after its release. Most likely again because Disney didn’t buy CHUD a ticket.
Once again, WRONG! There was a press screening but Renn and I were in LA at the time. I bought a ticket gladly, chose to run a Microscope because they’re fun. You are so ill informed it hurts.
Which character did you play in The Troll Hunter- the one under the bridge, or the big one at the end?
How about instead of bitching about how the site isn’t exactly what YOU want, you just go and find another site that IS? Wouldn’t that make everyone alot happier?
Here I was thinking carthartik, and shitty readers like him, left with Devin.
Shaun H says:
“While I understand the constant gripes throughout these films about the human characters receiving so much face time, it’s hard to think that, if it were reversed, that people would then be belly-aching about there not being enough character development with those who we are supposed to relate to.”
Probably, because that belly-aching would based on the assumption that if one were going to cram 7+ hours of movie with 130 human characters, there’s no way that one would make every 124 of them “comic” sidekicks, and every single one a gibbering lunatic, because, because…who would do that? Who would give someone 300 million dollars to do it? Three times?
Just saying, no one in the hypothetical world you envision could possibly be expected to hypothesize a world as twisted and nonsensical as the one we ourselves inhabit. It would be madness to even try.
While I agree with all points, Mr. Nunziata, especially the bit where we could just cut the human crap out and just have it be about robots, I would like to play devil’s advocate on a couple of parts!
One, I thought Sam Whitwicky wasn’t nearly as annoying as usual. I couldn’t stand his “wit” in the other movies, and actually found myself laughing at a couple of the things he said this time.
Secondly, it seemed like the movie had a couple bits of clever foreshadowing in it. When the retarded minibots are watching Star Trek, they remark: “Oh this is the one where Spock goes crazy,” and in the movie Nimoy voices the robot that betrays the good guys! And later, Megatron destroys the statue of Abraham Lincoln, and you find out the Decipticons want to take the humans as slaves! Now, I’m probably grasping at straws or these were happy accidents, but they still made me chuckle when I realized them. And that’s the point of this article, right? Over-analyzing a movie that doesn’t really deserve it.
Anyways, guess there’s always the ’89 cartoon movie, right? If we just want to see robots doing shit.
It is a summer popcorn movie. That is all. It isn’t Schindler’s List. There is no hidden meaning. Am I the only person left that goes to a movie to just “escape” sometimes?
Anyway, pretensious movie critics who have a built-in hatred for all things Bay that also look down their noses at the ignorant masses who purchase tickets to his movies are apparently the ones who find their own butt cracks fascinating. Give me a break.
Summer movies don’t need hidden meanings, nor do they have to be classics, and yeah, they can just be temporary escapes from everyday life. They can even be batshit insane escapes. All I ask, and all that anybody really asks, is that they be GOOD. It is not ‘pretentious’ to say that any of these escapist fantasies are bad. Even Bay has made good, albeit batshit, movies in the past – the Bad Boys films and, for me, especially The Rock. The latter movie has some legitimate character moments as well some absurd moments that have me giggling like a fucking bastard. On the other hand, Bay has made some horrible movies. Pearl Harbor. Transformers 2. And now, Transformers 3. These are breathtakingly awful I think, and just because they TRY to be escapist popcorn films do not mean that have succeeded.
I repeat: a good summer popcorn movie is not simply defined by the fact that it is in June-August, you’re eating popcorn and shit is blowing up. They are most defined by the first adjective: GOOD. And Transformers 3 is, most certainly not good. Of course it’s not trying to be Schindler’s List; unfortunately, outside of drilling phony CGI destruction into my eye holes, nobody bothered caring if they were even making a fun movie.
Hey “cathartik”, if you don’t like what Nick writes or how he writes it then get the fuck off his site. Transformers 3 is a steaming pile of shit that even your bitch ass refuses to see so stop taking shots at how this site chooses to cover it. Go back to sucking troll dick over at AICN where your kind belongs.
Actually, there were many more Movie Microscopes and they used to be THE reason to come to CHUD. You have not lived until you’ve read the legendary “Torque” Movie Microscope.
Congratulations for the review Nick…and how about making all the old Microscopes available again…apparently there is a whole new generation that does’nt know what CHUD’s all about…
Considering the film’s length and its depiction of Chicago’s destruction one could argue that it IS trying to be Schindler’s List and that is the problem.
Someone just HAS to do a tongue-in-cheek semi-serious analysis of Michael Bay’s psychology based on his cinematic output. And the great thing is, a profile of Bay would automatically be a profile of the American identity since the general public was absolutely stunned and amazed by the brilliance of Transformers 3, going by that mind-boggling readers score on Rotten Tomatoes.