George Lucas, obviously, isn’t solely to blame for Red Tails - a pandering clutter of vacant emotional beats, thudding dialogue and glossy CG dogfighting. But this was his baby, a carrot on a stick he’s been wielding in interviews for over two decades. Tails has always come off as something of a passion project for Lucas much in the same way Spielberg spoke, and still speaks, of Schindler’s List. No, he’s not solely to blame. But he certainly got the ball rolling.
It’s hard to determine where producer George Lucas ends and director Anthony Hemingway begins. So much of what is wrong in the Star Wars prequels is maddeningly present here. Lucas may not have directed the film, but this wholeheartedly feels like Lucas’ work of recent vintage. Much like the prequels, it’s not about what’s there. It’s about what isn’t – and Red Tails is a film without an emotional center.
“This is for you, pretty white boy with your bright yellow nose!”
What confounds me is why this, a historical biopic inspired by the famed Tuskegee Airmen of World War II, was a story that Lucas in particular felt so compelled to tell. If this is truly the Red Tails that Lucas had envisioned in his head for all these years, then we’ve clearly overestimated his grasp on how to entertain an audience. This film has an A, a B, and nothing of substance in the journey from one to the other.
“Red tails. This will make the group distinctive!”
This is a story that should be told, that deserves to be told on the big screen. The allegory of the Tuskegee Airmen is an inspired one – they were the first African American pilots in the United States and their contributions to the war amidst racial strife are the very definition of heroism. But its astounding how screenwriters John Ridley and Aaron McGruder (and one assumes Lucas had a sweaty paw in this as well) handle both narrative and character so dismissively.

The Tuskegee Airmen were interesting, compelling men with a great story to tell. Red Tails presupposes that they weren't.
Every character is a tired archetype. There’s the hot shot Lighting (David Oyelowo), that doesn’t do what he’s told. There’s also the conflicted leader Easy (Nate Parker), refusing the call around every turn. The comedic wise guy Smokey, played by Ne-Yo, ferociously chews his way through through the film’s framework and is a strong early contender for the most irritating character of 2012. Poor Cuba Gooding Jr. looks as if he lost his Oscar and stumbled into Red Tails to find it. He doesn’t, and his insistance on mugging through every scene no matter what’s actually happening is either a joke or a sad commentary on the importance with which he views his craft. The lines of dialogue these characters are asked to deliver do them no favors, and the actors spew them out with the conviction and grace of reading a Sunday newspaper aloud to your kids.
“How do you like that, Mr. Hitler?!”
There are some real clunkers in Red Tails. I can take historical inaccuracies. I can accept the fact that the maneuvers planes pull off in the film simply weren’t possible. I can accept that when a character spends five minutes of the film getting doused with fuel in his cockpit, he’s still able to be pulled from the wreckage when his plane crashes and explodes. I can even accept that three years of WWII combat has been condensed to what feels like a few days. But I can’t accept any of these things if the screenwriters, the actors, the director, don’t believe. And it’s clear that they don’t. There’s no effort in Red Tails, no poetry. ILM does their usual inspired work in the effects, but if the story on the ground isn’t there then who cares what’s happening in the sky? Red Tails is not a complete film. It strings together some scenes, some CG dogfights, kills a character or two for dramatic effect, brings one back for the happy ending, then it ends. It mercifully ends.

Planes will suspiciously maneuver like X-Wings in Red Tails.
“I can’t lead these men. I’ve made too many mistakes!”
Someday there will be a great film that tells the story of the Tuskegee Airman in a way that it truly deserves. These were great men, heroic and brave at a time in history when no one would have blamed them for phoning it in. But Red Tails is not that film. These were not infallible human beings, they were true flesh and blood men with fears, flaws and eccentricities. Tails never dives beyond its glossy surface level to make that distinction and lend the film a more profound emotional resonance.
“You’ve made one big mistake: that self-pity of yours. But it ends right here! Right now!”
I’m not mad at George Lucas, but I do feel sorry for him. It’s clear now that he doesn’t understand the fundementals of mainstream storytelling. Sure, there’s money in Lucas’ methods. But when your recent filmography is Red Tails, Kingdom of the Crystal Skull, and the Star Wars prequels, that alone speaks volumes. If Lucas’ heart wasn’t in his recent works that’s one thing. But when your passion project is every bit as clunky and vapid as your failures, then it’s time to hang it up. And mean it this time.
Rating:


Out of a Possible 5 Stars










Great review! I feel this story should have been told more through the look and feel of a Saving Private Ryan. These men were still at war and still died fighting for their country, instead Red Tails makes it seem like the Red Bull air show was in town and a few crashes occurred on scene and Red Tails shares that story.
I think it’s time we all reevaluate our reverence for George Lucas. Was he ever good? Honestly, was he? How much of Raiders of the Lost Ark was Steven Spielberg, Lawrence Kasdan, and Harrison Ford? How much of Star Wars (the first 2 good movies) was Gary Kurtz, Irvin Kirshner, Lawrence Kasdan, and Harrison Ford? We always hear, “He gave us Star Wars, and that’s enough!” But did he? Did he even give us Star Wars, or was it a bunch of other people, starting with Gary Kurtz who took a sliver of a really bad script and said, “Let’s try making this.”?
You could go back even further: how much of American Graffiti was Francis Ford Coppola? Although THX-1138 is very obviously a Lucas film that spells out much of what his chronic problems have been over the years.
Actually , YES, Star Wars WAS George Lucas’s. I’m getting a bit sick of how people who “had their childhood raped” by Lucas are now trying to rewrite history and say that Lucas did NOTHING ; that anything good that he might have done is somebody else’s credit. I remember seeing an article in the New York Times in 1976 , just after Jaws was cresting, that talked about the “new breed” of directors coming out of film schools. In it, was a shadowy black and white pic of a hairy something being led down a hall , by the director of American Graffitti . I knew then that science fiction was going to get its due , and starting telling all my friends about how things were going to change (Although Jaws was the start of the summer blockbuster) . I think Lucas’s role in bringing science fiction and fantasy to entertainment has been downplayed ever since he crashed and burned with the Prequels( though he started with Return ). YES, he lost it when he starting directing towards marketing instead of entertainment, and you can’t excuse him for that, but you can’t deny if it wasn’t for him, we wouldn’t have a lot of the entertainment we have since. Red Tails might be crap(by the way, the comment that the planes fly suspiscously like X-Wings is hilarious) ,but I’m wondering how much of the animosity towards it is being written by those “rape victims”and not because its not a good movie(which it might be) .
We’re not saying that George Lucas is DEFINITELY not talented and that he DEFINITELY cannot be revered for his place in film history. We’re just saying that more and more of the evidence of his storytelling prowess speaks to the contrary. But I don’t hold any animosity toward him or whether or not the movie is good. I’m not an investor; I have no dog in this fight (ha!).
Using the “Lucas raped my childhood” meme in any sense whatsoever completely destroys any argument regarding the value of George Lucas in cinema history. It’s over ten years old and was exactly that: a meme. DROP IT.
That said. It’s very easy to see the unique stylistics of Star Wars in THX and elements of Luke’s story in Graffiti. He’s the only guy on the planet who could have made that movie. But he also had a team of people around him so integral to the final product that had any single one of them been absent, the whole thing may have been laughable (ie: tonally out of whack if not entirely ridiculous).
Does it have a giant German zeppelin at the end where they have to shoot a rocket into a small exhaust vent to blow it up? That would be great!
Did Lucas have anything to do with Star Wars’ being so good and successful? Yes. It was his baby. Kurtz? A producer doesn’t make a film good, only allows good filmmaking to happen. Harrison Ford? One good actor doesn’t make a film work.
The reason Star Wars works so well is because Lucas was forced to work on the script for two years, at the demand of the studio, because his early drafts were terrible and didn’t make sense…but there were seeds of great ideas in them. The same thing happened to the Wachowski brothers…slaved over the first Matrix script at the demand of the studio, had enough clout on the sequels to shoot a first draft script, or something damn near it.
Lucas was already a great gear head and his mind was most driven towards the visual FX and making them as real as possible. He nearly had a heart attack slave driving ILM towards perfection. The bottom line is Lucas made Star Wars work because he worked himself half to death on it…cast it well, shot it well, edited it well, and scored it like a motherfucker. Many people helped Lucas, but none of them took it very seriously. He had the vision. It took every single bit of blood, swear and tears, and combined with great storytelling in the classical mode, merged with sci-fi that got a new injection of imagination via the visual FX, and you have a perfect storm of talent and creativity.
That is why Star Wars is Lucas’. Though I’d argue half the success of that film is due to the score by Williams. It’s dangerously close to looking very silly without that score to carry it.
I think Empire works mainly because of Lucas’ guiding hand and the talent of those he picked to make the film. They made a masterpiece, something even greater than the first one. And I think Lucas was so turned off by how dark and serious Empire was, he reacted a little too severely and turned Jedi into a muppet filled toy commercial. He was firmly an empire himself by that time and I think his filmmaking instincts were watered down by his corporate responsibilities and his overbearing need to protect what he’d created. And that transformation from filmmaker to billionaire empire maker was severe enough to destroy whatever semblance of talent he’d possessed before.
If your argument is that Red Tails would have been good if someone held their feet to the fire and made them write and rewrite and write some more until they had a good script, then I’d point out that Lucas has been working on this project for TWENTY YEARS. He has had ample time and resources to come up with a great script.
I don’t subscribe to the idea that Lucas is without talent. It’s idiotic to argue that he’s the figure head at the top of the Star Wars empire. A lot of people contributed to the greatness of those films and the Indiana Jones films but Lucas is still responsible for the wealth of inspiration, the entire universe, the characters, etc.
But the man can’t write a good script to save his life and he has no concept of how to direct actors. His films inspire because they have great ideas and expert craftsmen behind them, but they fail because the guy in charge couldn’t direct his way out of a wet paper bag.
Stepping in to point out that Lucas neither wrote nor directed Tails. For certain, this was his baby and he should be the first to fall on the sword. But there’s a lot of bad decisions on display here. Not all of them his. But even I had to look up and double check that this wasn’t written by Lucas, because it reads and sounds like it really, truly was. We’ll never know how much of what’s in the film is ultimately his and his alone.
Your right, but only partially. Lucas was a great filmmaker when he made Star Wars. He was a great filmmaker when he made American Graffiti. The problem is that once he and Gary Kurtz separated after Empire, there was absolutely nobody left to tell him when his ideas stunk. Return was the begging of Lucas thinking in terms of money only. it can’t be a coincidence that once Kurtz was no longer his partner all his movies included some very silly elements. Are you really going to pretend that Kurtz had no hand in how American Graffiti, Star Wars, or Empire Strike Back turned out? If that’s the case then why did the tone of Star Wars change so dramatically after Empire? It’s because he no longer had anyone with equal power to veto bad ideas like the Ewoks or Jar Jar Binks. All the reviews I’ve read about Red Tails say it is an empty soulless movie. Sounds exactly like all the Star Wars movies after Empire.
Star Wars and Empire were so good that millions of people are still looking for that experience again. Unfortunately, if George Lucas name is on the project you can be sure that the human element will not be included. You’ll get lot’s of great special effects and a throwaway movie you may barely remember once you’ve left the theater.
My right to what?
Great write-up, Tim. Yes the Tuskegee Airmen story is one that should be told with reverence, but there was absolutely nothing I saw about Red Tails to ever make me want it to be the film that did it.
Man oh man, the Lucas apologists are going to come out of the WOODWORK for this one…
They never apologise for those plaid shirts though. When he came out on the Daily Show and I saw that shirt I just imagined he has a wardrobe full of them, fashion wise he’s the Crocodile Hunter of directors.
Hasn’t anyone seen the old movie with Lawrence Fishburne. It might have been made for TV but I saw it on video, quite a good little flick, all the drama but lacking the cgi dog fights of this film.
I think it was just called The Tuskegee Airmen.
I was going to mention this as well. It’s from 1995, and I think it was made for TV. I remember seeing it on HBO, I think. Either way, I thought it was very good and it focused on what was so important about these men and their extraordinary accomplishments, not dogfights.
Also, it just occurred to me that Cuba Gooding Jr. was in that movie, too. Maybe he’s so uninspired in Red Tails because he already took part in a movie about the Tuskegee Airmen that didn’t suck and miss the point.
OK, before this goes any further, I’m not necessarily apologizing for Lucas , just getting mad that people start off with ANYTHING he’s done since , well Return, with scorn. The reason Lucas is out front on this is because it puts people in the seats. People see Lucas and say”Hey, George Lucas, maybe it’ll have some good special effects , lets go see it.” While others see Lucas and (OHMYGODMUSTYOUUSETHATOLDMEME; LTFU) automatically assume it MUST be crap, because of how Lucas turned rancid( not arguing that point) . Which is sad, because Lucas is right that if he wasn’t behind it, probably no studio WOULD finance or pickup an action movie with a mostly black ensemble.And the Tuskegee Airmen were a underserved piece of American history(though not totally forgotten) . Judge the film on the film , not that it has Lucas’s name in the credits.
I think Lucas’ earlier work should absolutely be taken into account given he’s a driving creative force behind the project. Red Tails wasn’t brought to his doorstep. This was a project he built from the ground up. I don’t see a scenario where his filmography shouldn’t be brought into the conversation. This has always been primarily his film, 20 years rolling.
Really didn’t care for this one too Tim. I knew from the horrible opening dialogue sequences that I was in for a stinker. Man those characters were so damn flat and lifeless. I’ve lost hope in Lucas, despite how much he did or didn’t have to do with this film.
“It’s hard to determine where producer George Lucas ends and director Anthony Hemmingway begins”. Great observation. I have a feeling Hemmingway was another Richard Marquand (depending on which sources you believe, Return Of The Jedi was to all intents and purposes directed by Lucas with Marquand being his puppet). Having seen RT, it’s painfully obvious ol’ Turkey Neck had his fingerprints all over it. Only Irvin Kershner and Spielberg (on Raiders) had the balls to say “Fuck off George, I’m directing this movie my way”.
No. I don’t think I’ll ever get over Macho Grande.
I actually thought this movie was good. The whole theater did as well. But to the other discussion it does not matter if Lucas actually made Star Wars or not he did one thing right and got all the money.
Yousa guys BOMBAD. Dat’s why you no be liking us me tink.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EhgQ0CgUXmU&feature=related