There’s been a movement in radio-friendly rock music in the last few years that has seen the genre move towards a watered-down metal format that thematically tends to be fixated on very vague male aggression. Always seemingly sung at some nebulous enemy, these songs trade on insecure masculinity and hazy hostility to fill out their jock-angst rock ballads. The songs tend to be briefly fashionable for action movie trailers, and usually sound as if they were engineered specifically to play out of a stereo sat on an open tailgate while a bunch of bros get juiced up before the high school football game.
Act Of Valor is every one of those songs morphed into a film.
It’s also a naked attempt to capitalize on pick-up truck patriotism and cheap sentiment to tell a paper-thin story built on the hot button fear-mongering that plagued this country for a decade following 9/11. Short of calling it outright propaganda, it’s safe to say Act Of Valor is selling a narrative that has no qualms about linking disparate political issues for a cheap scare. Seriously, Act Of Valor would really appreciate it if you guys would be as frightened again as you were the day after September 11th, if possible. The movie is a faded “Never Forget” bumper sticker brought to cinematic life, with about as much actual thought given to the issues on which it comments as you took to slap the sticker onto your bumper.
The story, in which a group of SEALS stumble upon a Muslim extremist’s plot to sneak some suicide bombers into America equipped with some particularly nasty gear, barely has the twists and turns to fill out an episode of 24, much less a feature film. It also employs some of the cheesiest villainy imaginable, including an over-the-top act of terrorism that sets up our bad guy all the way through his final plan that of course involves the Mexican/US border and illegal immigration.
As irritating as the circa 2002 fearsploitation is though, even more frustrating is that the entire concept on which the film is predicated quite simply doesn’t work. As every poster, trailer, and even a talking-head segment with the directors that plays beforehand will drill into you, this is a military action film that stars genuine active-duty Navy SEALS and their families, most of which was shot on Navy training facilities with full cooperation of the US Armed Forces. The problem comes with the fact that these SEALS and their families are being presented in the context of a traditional Hollywood narrative film. This means there is a cheesy action plot complete with cartoonish villains, giant leaps of logic in the plot, melodrama, and ticking clocks that are all trying to co-exist with real people faking real things on the screen.
This is not how movies work, and this may well make Act Of Valor the first reality-TV movie.
Cinema works because good movies create their own self contained universes wherein lies and artifice are used to immerse the audience and ultimately work through your brain to stab at the same neurons that create genuine empathy and emotion. Reality TV on the other hand, works on an entirely separate level where documentary techniques let real people doing fake things appear to be genuine. Reality TV is a more fleeting, junk food attempt to tell a documentary story, and there’s a reason the form has remained relegated to pandering, mainstream television. Attempting to merge that form with cinema creates a distorted, stakes-less story from which we’re supposed to be appreciating the reality of these guys doing what they actually do, meanwhile transparently fake things are happening around them. Planting lead right between the eyes of suspension of disbelief, this idea suggests we should get off on the reality of these operatives doing what they do in the way they actually do it, and then actually feel fear for these guys when somebody is shot or dives onto a grenade in slow-motino. On the other side of the coin, watching real families mime fake tragedy is — if not outright offensive — a bizarre situation that creates an inescapable cognitive dissonance.
Consider for a moment the still-forming genre of “found footage,” which has often been used as a technique to create the kind of immersing effervescence that Act Of Valor seems to be going for. The difference is that found footage movies tend to still use the traditional cinematic toolbox, with the claims of “this is real footage” used merely as framing for a straightforward movies with straightforward actors in them. For all its video game sensibilities and successful capturing of genuine bravado, Act Of Valor never comes half as close as any found footage movie to creating the sensation that you’re watching something real.
But beyond the flawed gimmick and beyond the DTV-tier screenplay played out by non-actors, the film is also robbed of any value because even its military fetishism and combat action are only ever decently shot at best. While the first sequence — in which the teams assaults a terrorist training base to recover a kidnapped CIA agent — is very effective and filled with equal parts quiet precision and exciting vehicular action, it’s all downhill from there. The action quickly becomes broken up by the stretches of Z-grade conspiracy plotting and the exceptionally lame attempts at character building. When the SEALs interact with each other there is a genuine matter-of-factness and stilted emotional candor that is a real thing between men in these situations, but these admirably rough moments are ruined when a real actor steps in and throws the scene off. The action is also interrupted as we start learning what our cartoon terrorist bad guy is up to, which involves explosive claymore-style suicide vests that can apparently pass through most security and kill lots and lots of people. Naturally, because it’s an action movie, the same SEAL team manages to unrealistically remain involved in this counter-terrorism plot all across the globe.
When the action does pick back up the quality drops steeply and we get a cheaper version of the same chaotic coverage and piecemeal editing of all the B-actioners we get each weekend. The filmmaking is not without its inventive tricks and clever shots, but rarely does an effective moment occur that is not quickly swallowed back up into the mess. Very few scenes in this film are lent any sort of extra credibility by the knowledge that these guys are actually trained to do these things, and again, the artifice of a rehearsed actor and careful filmmaking would likely have been as much or more able to put the audience in the SEALs shoes. Ultimately you have to tell some lies to get to the truth.
So while the hook of the film is that these are real military guys who know what the fuck they’re doing, most of the blocking and choreography is presented with as much sophistication as a multi-player match of Call Of Duty. Along with the occasional first-person-POV shots that litter the film, the influence of military video games is seen as every bad guy is invariably taken out with a headshot that creates the same blood burst and unrealistic SPLAT sound effect. Even beyond that laziness the sound design is inconsistent and often ineffective, so even something as badass as vehicle being ripped to shreds by .50 cal shells isn’t as spectacular as it should be.
Failing on virtually every level Act Of Valor relies on melodrama and shallow sentimentality to pay tribute to the efforts of our brave soldiers and operatives. It does so while ignoring the fact that it spends most of its running time turning military action into spectacle, and turning complex and dangerous international crisis into shitty thriller cliche. By slathering itself with a reverential tone for military bravery and with gestures like including the names of fallen SEALs in the credits, the film seeks to insulate itself from the questionable nature of what it’s doing. Let me assure you though, you can support the troops without supporting this pile of shit.
Rating: 




Out of a Possible 5 Stars
Twitter
Comment Below
Message Board









The Real Cancun was the first Reality TV movie Renn! God…get it right you dirty hippy…
I for one am shocked he and most other professional reviewers don’t like this movie. Shocked I tell you! Is this a war movie or a movie about the Bush War on Terror? Critics can’t seem to tell the difference. A movie as unabashedly pro-military as this is bound to be divisive with critics on one side and pretty much everyone else on the other. For me it was a breath of fresh air and departure from the normal depiction of the military.
Yeah, no. Enjoy your elitism fantasies. “and pretty much everyone else” lol
By the way, I come from a military family and love and support my cousin who did a tour apiece in Iraq and Afghanistan. The shittiness of this film has not a thing to do with being supportive of the military. The fact that it both fails to do justice to the work these men do, and simultaneously exploits them and their families to sell a worn-out political narrative from six years ago has everything to do with it.
But nothing will do justice…
Shit! Somebody beat me to it!
Wait, that last remark was in response to the Real Cancun. This isn’t posting right…
Thanks for the kneejerk reaction, Mr-Defensive-about-the-Movie-guy! If you bothered to read more than a single paragraph of the fucking review, you’d know that he extensively tore it to shreds for being poorly made. He barely even bothers to contemplate the politics, because it’s just a propaganda piece for the military anyway. This is of course a REVIEW, which means it’s his OPINION, and you’re welcome to like it all the same. BUT READ THE FUCKING REVIEW BEFORE YOU WHINE NEXT TIME.
@Renn: I really wanted this to be good, but every non-action scene in the trailers features the worst line reads since the last time Channing Tatum was on the big screen. Thanks for the review.
Would you prefer Haywire, probably not it had Channing Tatum, “your real actor”, that acting sucked as bad or worse because they weren’t the real guys at least. Your right the politics were purposefully left out as much they could be. They even tried to not over dramatize..they could have been chasing suit-case nukes, which was also real several years back.
Thanks for this review Renn! I wrote my review awhile back (its quality isn’t nearly as good as yours), but the point I was trying to get across was that I disliked the movie because it was a BAD MOVIE and not because of my feelings for the military. It ended up getting over 100 replies from various people claiming to be members of the Army or close to members and everyone attacked me for not being patriotic and for not seeing how much RESPECT this film pays to the troops.
I tried again and again explaining how my review was based on the FILM I watched and not how authentic it was to real life situations or how brave it was for supporting the troops.
People kept saying I was the ONLY ONE that didn’t like the film and now I at least have your review to steer them in for some backup support!
The second I saw the “Starring active duty SEALS” thing, it just brought back memories of every movie that featured real athletes or other notable non-actors, where they’re doing something in the movie that they probably do every day, but don’t seem convincing at all because they’re trying to act or say something as it was written, not how they’d REALLY say it.
I work at a theater in a town where I’m sure that this movie is going to clean up this weekend with the older veterans and NASCAR crowds, and I myself am a veteran, but I find this kind of pandering to be pretty offensive, because it seems designed to make you look like an asshole if you say anything bad about it. I’m still waiting for another “Stripes”, or a movie about the horrors of peacetime and having to just “hurry up and wait” (the Armed Forces motto) all the time. Maybe it could star real-life Army dorm managers, bus drivers, and groundskeepers.
Starring real SEALs doing real SEAL things with live ammunition on screen is too awesome a premise to pass up. Poor acting and poor narrative? I was expecting that from the trailer anyway, so even if the action scenes are at least somewhat well shot, it sounds like worth a rental to me. Though I’m with the poster above me; a movie about what life in the military is ACTUALLY like (which would end up being more less like Black Hawk Down and more like Office Space..) would be a nice change of pace.
Election year and Hollywood releases a pro military movie? Gravity check…
Real actors wouldn’t even be able to touch live rounds, much less fake it. Acting be damned! As for election year, who cares…are you happy with the change we got…what change?…only worse and openly so. Do you expect any real change movie or no movie? As for shooter games they try to recreate the real not this movie recreating the game. I’m a 100% disabled vet that did real ops and this was pretty real. For the first time I was pain free (drug free always) leaving the movie and feeling 15 years younger ( I only retired two years ago). For once Hollywood got something right, wold you prefer a movie like “Pearl Harbor” (not so bad) trying to present reality and failing? I assure you this was the most real yet to ever hit the big screen. My only problem was the chief needed some help with his hat (cover) at the funeral. I think that bothered me as a Chief.
Yes, non-military probably had a real problem following the lingo. For example: “The Marines will be here to exploit the site…” it is more than just a clean-up. Without being able to follow that kind of dialog, yes you probably lost a lot. But if you are a twilitezoner then that probably your usual path.
Now I can take my teenagers and adult children and show them what their shooter game lacks and what the time not home looked like. They already know the family beach and the funeral sceen by heart.
Did they really use live rounds in the making of the movie? If so, wow, what a fucking waste. Seriously. The next time you hear about military spending, what they can or can’t afford to do to support troops, remember that live ammunition, a pretty precious resource, was wasted in the making of a fucking movie.
If they just called this Call of Duty or Modern Warfare and had ties to Activision in some way, how much money would this movie make?
It depends. I mean, do they cut it down to a PG-13 so that the 13-year olds can see it? I kind of DO admire that about this particular movie though, that it’s still R-rated, regardless of the actual quality of the film.
I can imagine an R-rated Modern Warfare or CoD movie doing really well, though. No?
It used to be, in the good ol’ days, that a propoganda piece like this would be competently shot and have John Wayne in it. Its a crying shame America can’t make a reactionary movie worth a damn anymore.
So CHUD Act of Valor gets 1 star but the Star Wars Porn Parody gets 3?…Really?…
Hey, they’re totally different kinds of movies, and I’m sure they were scored accordingly. Maybe Act of Valor was shitty for an action movie, but the Star Wars parody was good for a porno. The Star Wars porn parody probably has better acting too. Also: Tits.
if it was a movie starring real Seals, instead of SEALs, fighting terrorists it would have been infinitely more entertaining. Like a mashup of The Selkie and Rambo 3.
While I understand alot of Renns problems with the film,I just don’t get the complaints with the wooden acting and lazy plotting,You knew you were gonna get that ahead of time this was a film built on the gimmic of using real Navy Seals with live ammunition…Now what the real question is in relation too the film is doe’s that gimmic pay off?..I have too say it was super refreshing too see actual tatics and proper weapons handling in a film, the firefights were intense, abrupt and well staged..Maybe everyone’s just become so used too processed gunfire sound effects and mondo over the top movie gunfights that the sounds and sights of the real deal is no longer impressive?..Yes the film works real hard at thumping it’s patriotism right into your forehead,But whats so wrong with that?..Yet at it’s worst it’s its better than most action fare thats made anymore….At its best its Modern Warfare the movie even down to its bad guys..
I think you used to many words on this review honestly. Could have done it in 3…”This movie sucks.”