<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: BLU-RAY REVIEW: SCREAM&#160;4</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.chud.com/84370/blu-ray-review-scream-4/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.chud.com/84370/blu-ray-review-scream-4/</link>
	<description>Your place for movie news and discussion.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 11 Apr 2013 20:53:16 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tony Baker</title>
		<link>http://www.chud.com/84370/blu-ray-review-scream-4/comment-page-1/#comment-143430</link>
		<dc:creator>Tony Baker</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Mar 2012 17:14:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chud.com/?p=84370#comment-143430</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;Great titles, Dahlia!  I&#039;m officially calling shenanigans if Craven ends up trying to rip one or both of them off.


Bishop... it probably seems like I hated the flick, but in all honesty, I didn&#039;t.  I was just underwhelmed by it; due partly, I think, to my rather gilded recollections of 1-3.  I just watched through the entire series again for the first time in ten years the other day, and I&#039;d love to do a &quot;Franchise Me&quot;-style column giving my updated take on the lot of them.


Also, you&#039;re right about the opening.  I meant to mention it in the review, but it slipped my mind somehow.  I think it would have crossed the line into true brilliance if they had taken it even further and done a THIRD fake-out teaser.  The only problem I have with the opening as it stands is that I think, after two false starts, the real teaser needed to REALLY be something special, and it just didn&#039;t deliver.  I actually thought the alternate opening in the deleted scenes was better, as a matter of fact. &lt;/p&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great titles, Dahlia!  I&#8217;m officially calling shenanigans if Craven ends up trying to rip one or both of them off.</p>
<p>Bishop&#8230; it probably seems like I hated the flick, but in all honesty, I didn&#8217;t.  I was just underwhelmed by it; due partly, I think, to my rather gilded recollections of 1-3.  I just watched through the entire series again for the first time in ten years the other day, and I&#8217;d love to do a &#8220;Franchise Me&#8221;-style column giving my updated take on the lot of them.</p>
<p>Also, you&#8217;re right about the opening.  I meant to mention it in the review, but it slipped my mind somehow.  I think it would have crossed the line into true brilliance if they had taken it even further and done a THIRD fake-out teaser.  The only problem I have with the opening as it stands is that I think, after two false starts, the real teaser needed to REALLY be something special, and it just didn&#8217;t deliver.  I actually thought the alternate opening in the deleted scenes was better, as a matter of fact. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Black_Dahlia</title>
		<link>http://www.chud.com/84370/blu-ray-review-scream-4/comment-page-1/#comment-143411</link>
		<dc:creator>Black_Dahlia</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Mar 2012 05:25:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chud.com/?p=84370#comment-143411</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I also remember this as a decent film, but that&#039;s about all I remember - a good way to waste a couple of hours but completely forgettable.

I think I&#039;ll skip &lt;strong&gt;&lt;em&gt;5cream &lt;/em&gt;&lt;/strong&gt;and &lt;strong&gt;&lt;em&gt;Scr6am&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;em&gt;.&lt;/em&gt; ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I also remember this as a decent film, but that&#8217;s about all I remember &#8211; a good way to waste a couple of hours but completely forgettable.</p>
<p>I think I&#8217;ll skip <strong><em>5cream </em></strong>and <strong><em>Scr6am</em></strong><em>.</em> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bishop2</title>
		<link>http://www.chud.com/84370/blu-ray-review-scream-4/comment-page-1/#comment-143380</link>
		<dc:creator>Bishop2</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Feb 2012 17:05:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chud.com/?p=84370#comment-143380</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Man, this is the best Scream flick since the original. It&#039;s not scary, but how could it be? Nothing since the opening sequence of part one has provided any real tension. What&#039;s clever is that it pulls the same bait-and-switch trick the original did, only improved. That movie was marketed as a Drew Barrymore vehicle, and it totally screwed with you. This one was marketed as a reboot, and it totally screwed with you again, intentionally killing off the new cast and kept the old cast so that they could say &quot;Fuck reboots. Who fuckin&#039; needs &#039;em? The original is still good, and that&#039;s enough.&quot; Some funny jokes throughout, too, even if the horror fails. Big thumbs up from me. 
I&#039;m also grateful that there&#039;s no bullshit cliffhanger, which is something the film almost ended with. I hate that shit - you can never guarantee you&#039;ll get to resolve it, so don&#039;t do it. And they don&#039;t. They flinch, and WISELY so.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Man, this is the best Scream flick since the original. It&#8217;s not scary, but how could it be? Nothing since the opening sequence of part one has provided any real tension. What&#8217;s clever is that it pulls the same bait-and-switch trick the original did, only improved. That movie was marketed as a Drew Barrymore vehicle, and it totally screwed with you. This one was marketed as a reboot, and it totally screwed with you again, intentionally killing off the new cast and kept the old cast so that they could say &#8220;Fuck reboots. Who fuckin&#8217; needs &#8216;em? The original is still good, and that&#8217;s enough.&#8221; Some funny jokes throughout, too, even if the horror fails. Big thumbs up from me.<br />
I&#8217;m also grateful that there&#8217;s no bullshit cliffhanger, which is something the film almost ended with. I hate that shit &#8211; you can never guarantee you&#8217;ll get to resolve it, so don&#8217;t do it. And they don&#8217;t. They flinch, and WISELY so.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk
Page Caching using disk: enhanced
Database Caching 24/32 queries in 0.010 seconds using disk

 Served from: www.chud.com @ 2013-05-24 18:28:49 by W3 Total Cache -->