My favorite part of Chernobyl Diaries occurs when Captain MacMillan and I snuck into Pripyat to assassinate General Zakhaev. The general survived, but I took that bastard’s arm.
Wait, let me back up, I think I must be confusing my references. That’s actually from the Chernobyl level in Call of Duty 4: Modern Warfare. Strange, I’d almost forgotten everything there is to know about this film called Chernobyl Diaries in the 12 hours since I saw it, but it’s coming back to me. Oh dear lord, it’s coming back to me.
This film, directed by first-timer Bradley Parker via Oren Peli’s (Paranormal Activity) concept, is abysmal. Abysmal in concept, execution, delivery – Chernobyl Diaries is an utterly pedestrian experience that’s quite possibly the worst film I’ll see in 2012. I would rather read the brail version of Anne Frank’s diary in the actual Chernobyl than ever have to sit through this piece of shit film again. Let’s start with the film’s biggest offense and work our way down.
Wes Craven needs to be credited somewhere here; this movie is The Hills of Chernobyl Have Eyes As Well. It’s his concept, lifted and deposited in the setting of Chernobyl. Both the title and the trailers are pushing found footage but, aside from the first three minutes where we see some of the kids backpacking through Europe, this film avoids the concept even though it doing its best to mimic the look. Parker shoots the entire ordeal via handheld buttcam, but there’s no character holding the camera.
Six young tourists are taken on an extreme backpacking excursion through barren, abandoned, radioactive wasteland that is the real life city of Pripyat and the Chernobyl Nuclear Power Plant. Only they end up getting stranded. It’s not long before they realize that Chernobyl isn’t so abandoned, and that something is after them. Could it be overgrown radioactive fish with human legs? Giant praying mantises laying eggs inside their bodies? Or perhaps it’s boring old mutants. Yeah, it’s probably mutants.
This is Chris. He is weak.
And that’s the funny thing with Chernobyl Diaries, you never really see the antagonists. Yes, they’re definitely mutants, but we only see quick glimpses or shadows. Worse, they kill not one single character on screen. Chernobyl Diaries promises gunfire. Off screen. Rabid dog attacks. Off screen. Murdery mutant mayhem. Off screen. Only one character dies on screen in all of this film, and he isn’t even killed by mutants. Which means that Chernobyl Diaries earns the unique distinction of being the only killer mutant movie where no mutants are seen killing anyone. How can I be sure that the mutants are the culprits behind any of this? Maybe the characters die on account of human error, zigging the rough terrain when they should be zagging. Sure, these creatures are snatching people and chasing them, but is it possible that they’re trying to warn these kids? “Don’t you idiots know you’re in a radioactive wasteland?”
And they are idiots. Chris and Paul, brothers in the film, are played respectively by pop star Jesse McCartney and some other guy. It’s Chris and his two friends who go to visit Paul in the Ukraine. Chris is unbearably weak, whining and crying at every opportunity. McCartney is terribly miscast (now and forever), looking like he’s auditioning for the Frankie Muniz role in a Malcolm in the Middle revival. We can’t be sure if Chris dies in the film (though we can dream), he just sort of disappears and is never heard from again. Is it better to burn out than to fade away? Sadly, with Chris we’ll never know.
Paul (Jonathan Sadowski) is only slightly more tolerable, but I found myself getting jealous when he began screaming “My eyes! I can’t see!” If only we were as lucky.
If you stare at this picture for too long, Chris steals a piece of your soul and uses it for crochet.
Fans of horror looking for their fix need best steer clear of this film. As most of the deaths happen offscreen, there’s hardly any gore in the film. I’ve seen papercuts bloodier than Chernobyl Diaries. The best special effect / action sequence occurs when the characters stare at a mutated fish and it just sort of flinches a bit. What’s worse, there are no ideas in this film that make something more of the concept. It’s just a concept and a setting – one where the most interesting moments are happening somewhere else. It begins, it ends, and I’m still not entirely sure what occurred in between, or why I should care.
If you’re thinking about seeing Chernobyl Diaries this weekend, fucking don’t.
Out of a Possible 5 Stars
10 comments
Saw this at midnight with a prospective love interest who wanted to see it. She is no longer an interest due to her enjoyment of this abortion
One bad movie choice and you’ve thrown the baby out with the bath water, eh?
Ahh Brave… should of let your little mutant attack her before doing any of the dumping.
Well played. This was just the straw that broke the camels back. She also claimed “they were dead the whole time” on Lost, and I lost my shit haha
Talk about a movie that PISSED ME THE FUCK OFF. What really bugged me was that I liked how it was shot, with the over-the-shoulder stuff that wasn’t handheld and I even liked where Parker placed the camera for the most part, but NONE of that was used to the film’s advantage. It’s like they just didn’t give a flying fuck about the actual product they were making, they just wanted to shoot something quick and cheap. FUCK this movie for wasting my time.
RE: LOST
They were dead the whole time – the writers just changed the ending when everyone guessed it from the first episode.
Re: Girlfreind
Seriously, if you have a GF who voluntarily watches genre stuff rather than drag you to shitty romcoms whenever it’s her turn to pick…you give her some leeway.
RE: LOST
They were dead the whole time – the writers just changed the ending when everyone guessed it from the first episode.
Re: Girlfriend
Seriously, if you have a GF who voluntarily watches genre stuff rather than drag you to shitty romcoms whenever it’s her turn to pick…you give her some leeway.
Ah, double post…double post…first it’s “you are posting comments too quickly, slow down!” then I re-type, notice a typo at the last second and you process it like MF’ing greased lightning.
I might check this out on home video, but I’m certainly not dipping into my entertainment fund to do so. But that’s pretty much how I feel about most movies today. I think the last couple movies I paid for in first run was THE AVENGERS and UNDERWORLD; AWAKENING. Yeah, sure, bag on me for AWAKENING, but it’s got Kate Beckinsale in 3D so fuck all the rest. But my point being, I used to go to the movies every week. Usually, one or two movies. But since the rising prices of tickets and the utter level of shit-high stink most movies seem to be seeped in, it just doesn’t seem worth it. I feel like I just got suckered into a carny trick. It’s probably my own fault for watching so many movies over the years that I seem to be less impressed by things.
Nardo is 100% correct, and anyone who doesn’t believe so is in denial of wasting 4 1/2 years of their life. Lost‘s creators scripted the final season the way they did to give themselves an “out”—alienating scads of loyal viewers is pretty bad for future business. Or do you think they wrote the later half of the show’s last season as an homage to the much-reviled Purgatorians, who were shot down mid-first season by Damon Lindelof’s vehement denial of their theory?
Comments are shown as archived from the original site; new comments are closed.