DVD REVIEW: DEAD BIRDS
- By Russ Fischer
- Published 03/24/2005
- DVD
BUY IT AT AMAZON: CLICK HERE!STUDIO: Sony
MSRP: $24.96 RATED: R
RUNNING TIME: 91 Minutes
SPECIAL FEATURES:
• Deleted Scenes
• The Making of Dead Birds
• Commentary by Director Alex Turner
• Commentary by Cast & Crew
• Trailer
I caught this film at the Toronto Film Fest last fall, and hoped it would generate at least a limited release. Though the plotting is flawed and some of the CGI already looks dusty, the core is a good concept executed with restraint and smarts. Dead Birds reminds me of horror films from years back; deliberately paced movies that held a mystique even after the first viewing. Sadly, a theatrical release wasn't in the cards, but Sony has released a solid DVD for the film, excepting the truly terrible cover. After you read the review, check out my interview with director Alex Turner here.
The Flick
It's
1863. A group of Confederate deserters rides into a small Alabama town,
following the trail of an Army gold deposit. Within moments, the crew has
murdered several people and grabbed bags of gold before riding off into the
swamp. Their destination: an abandoned farmhouse once owned by a soldier now
dead. Their leader, William (Henry Thomas), bunked next to the guy in a field
hospital. The perfect place to hole up before splitting for Mexico.
But
arriving at the edge of the property, the group encounters a strange beast, and
soon runs afoul of other supernatural emanations within the house. You know --
ghost kids, visions of bound slaves and men without skin. (No lament
configuration necessary.) Internal squabbling splits the loose-knit group into
greedy factions, and then the disappearances start.

While the jury deliberated, Michael Jackson relaxed with the bailiffs.
Dead Birds is a slow burn. The action takes
place almost entirely in the gloomy, moldering rooms and corridors of the old
plantation house. Last year, I made a comparison to The Devil's Backbone (here), but fans of Session 9 will get into the
severely aged space, the pacing and the splintering group dynamic.
The group
of characters is what really drew me into the film. First-time feature director
Alex Turner and his producers assembled a great and varied cast to flesh out
the mismatched gang. Henry Thomas makes a surprisingly strong, brooding lead
and is backed up by standout work from Isiah Washington as Todd, the guy who
gives weight to William's words. Watching Washington, I kept thinking of the
great, unshakable Woody Strode. Maybe it was just the hat.
.jpg)
With $37.50 secured for financing, Uwe Boll prepared his take on the Wizard of Oz.
Mark
Boone Jr. and Michael Shannon steal scenes as Joseph and Clyde, the malcontent
duo that wants to take their share of the gold, if not all of it, right now. The
script doesn't take many chances with them. On paper they're a pretty typical
bad/dumb pair. But Boone and Shannon have both the sneer and regular-guy
moments to make them memorable. Nikki Aycox (Jeepers Creepers 2 veteran)
and Patrick Fugit round out the group, and though they also suffer script anemia,
both actors work hard to become more than ciphers, and generally succeed.
Beyond
the small ensemble, there's also the overt atmosphere of Asian horror. The CGI
creatures are the product of an animation house in Korea, and they bring a
non-western influence to the mix. And the cyclical implications of the story,
as well as the notion that greed and guilt leave absolutely indelible stains,
have much in common with the current Asian horror manifesto. No one's getting
away clean here.
.jpg)
Wild Bill vowed never again to attempt opening oysters in the dark.
That's a
strong approach -- at least it's my favored approach to horror -- but with
watered-down sequels and remakes wearing out the welcome of Asian horror, the
tone of Dead Birds now looks like a serious gamble. It succeeds,
because while there's a definite nod to that school of ideas, the action here
is definitely rooted in the American past. The period setting helps
immeasurably; the same story with teens in a haunted house would feel cheap,
but here the setting makes the isolated setting and backstory more believable.
And it's
marvelously shot, with deep, intense shadows providing perfect ambiance. After
over-lit crap like Cursed, it was a pleasure to look at a film that wasn't afraid
of the dark. Turner and photographer Steve Yedlin (who partnered on May with
production designer Leslie Keel) refuse to linger too long on the creatures and
ghosts, with the exception of one backstory montage. While the practical
effects almost always work well, some of the CGI does stand out overmuch, but I
accept cheap digital just as much as the latex in old Stuart Gordon movies.
.jpg)
Ackerlund said my share of Spun's profits is out here somewhere...
There are
greater signs of strain, though. Probably unavoidable for an ambitious movie,
shot in 21 days on a budget of about $1.5 million. Apparently the backstory was
plenty violent for the producers, but not quite obvious enough. So be prepared
for some obvious overdubbing, where dialogue is interjected to 'explain' the
plot. No one needs an omnipotent narrator with no sense of decorum butting into
things. Besides turning the discovery of a strange book into the second
(fourth?) coming of the Necronomicon, these dumb intrusions simply make the
supernatural elements too obvious. Worse, they're kinda funny.
And
that's really unforgivable, because the rest of the film is moody and
determined enough to get away with a loose plot and backstory. By adding
concrete explanations, Dead Birds is cheapened. It's not enough
that a short schedule simply didn't offer time to flesh things out more fully;
they've got to pull in the Ghost of Stephen King's Career to make it painfully
obvious.
.jpg)
Having dispatched the opposition, Justice Roy Moore knew his monument had found a new home.
Those
time and money shortages don't have to be deal breakers -- and they're not. How
many horror films have moments where the seams show, and we just willingly move
on, because life's too short? What I like about Dead Birds is that it's a
great snapshot of how much can be done with relatively little, and a reminder
that even with one compromise after another, plenty of people will leave the
theatre scared and happy.
Check
this one out. It pulls off the period setting and drips with uneasy atmosphere.
Even the trite explanations can't ruin the mood, and I'd pick a flawed but
honest horror flick over a glossy TRL ghost story without even blinking.
6.8 out of 10
The Look
Considering
how little money was spent on this movie, and how dark many scenes are, this is
a fine looking disc. There's an extra helping of grain and noise in the first
scene's blue sky, but for the most part the transfer is clear and fairly crisp.
There is some edge enhancement, but since two thirds of the film is dimly lit,
with a palette that avoids high-contrast areas, it's not overpowering.
7 out of 10
The Noise
Most of
the film is accompanied by a rumbling, occasionally brassy score, and there's a
lot of depth in the Dolby track. There's actually a bit too much music in the
film, but here at least it all sounds great. Quieter dialogue passages can get
buried a bit, forcing a volume bump, but I didn't have to watch with one hand
on the remote.
.jpg)
You got a credit card?
The
biggest problem with the soundtrack is the excessive use of ADR. It's really
noticeable in a few key scenes because the dialogue synch is way off. I didn't catch
this the first time (it was midnight, and the sixth film I'd seen that day) but
on DVD the effect was extremely distracting.
5 out of 10
The Goodies
Deleted scenes - Most of this footage was
sacrificed to serve that almighty god, running time. Alex Turner is candid,
however, about the bits that were cut for being below par. One scene reinforces
the common wisdom that, on the frustration scale, filming children and animals
rates below only lapdances and phoning the natural gas company.
The Making of Dead Birds - Any featurette that kicks off
with a very drunk producer saying 'either we get this done in a month or we're
fucked' is OK by me. No glossy EPK, this. The content is pretty tyical --
pre-production, shooting and some talk about post-production -- but the video
footage captures some of the manic energy of making a period move in a very
limited time frame.
.jpg)
In retrospect, the box office potential of a combined Scary Movie / White Chicks sequel wasn't that high.
Commentaries - On track one, we get director
Alex Turner flying solo; on the second track he's joined by Henry Thomas, Nikki
Aycox, Peter Lopez (composer) and Simon Barrett (writer). The solo commentary
is a little bit dry, but as things go on, Turner's tone turns wry as he talks about
the process of working without the luxury of time and budget, pointing out all
the things that I thought didn't work as the film went along. And he explains
the worst line in the film -- when Isiah Washington identifies a book in the
barn -- as a last-minute piece of ADR which really should have reverted back to
the original dialogue. The group track is more lively, though there's a good
amount of repetition from the solo track.
7 out of 10
The Artwork
Ugh. Is this
from that mooted Gothika sequel set in Silent Hill? Maybe a capture from the
death throes of Photoshop taken during the uninstallation process? The disc's
menus at least preserve the beautiful macro-focus shots used for the title
sequence. The movie might be a tough sell, but it doesn't deserve this cover.
0 out of 10

