Quote:
|
Originally Posted by englebert
I really liked Mass Romantic, but I never got their follow up albums. Are they all considered a step down from Mass Romantic?
|
Definitely not. A lot of people who don't like Electric Version as much as the first one have loads of esteem for Twin Cinema, at least.
Personally, I think they're one of the best bands playing music today and that all of their albums are essential for different reasons. Mass Romantic is a scrappy, messy heap of pop; Electric Version is the more streamlined, efficient and cleaned-up version of that; Twin Cinema is an attempt to incorporate some more experimental bits and grander instrumentation into the formula, and Challengers is their attempt at de-emphasizing the fast and frenetic pop of their early albums and emphasizing the epic quality of the slower songs on Twin Cinema.
I'm, frankly, a little amazed that critics are so down on it (well, I've seen few outright negative reviews, but they're certainly the worst I've seen for a NP album), and I'm especially amazed that many of the complaints are that there are too few up-tempo songs like "All the Things That Go To Make Heaven and Earth"; those songs sound to me like solid, but not-too-spectactular NP-by-numbers, while the epics sound fresh and vital.
I also think some music critics don't have the background in playing music to understand why their songs have never been simple power-pop. They barely ever rely on standard verse-chorus-verse-chorus-bridge-chorus structures, there are all kinds of one-time-only tricks and odd changes. In short, if the critics are now disappointed that they've expanded their sound instead of sticking to upbeat, "simple" pop, they've been enjoying the band for some of the wrong reasons.