http://leisureblogs.chicagotribune.c...fan-liabl.html
Engadget had the following commentary:
The case is always subject to appeal. I guess this means if you're one of the 6,000 or so the RIAA sues (out of the over 9million downloaders) every year, you should not try to fight the man.
Quote:
| A jury in Duluth, Minn., found Thursday that a single mother of two children was liable for infringing copyright on 24 major-label recordings and awarded the record-industry $220,000 in damages. The woman, Jammie Thomas, was the first accused infringer to take the Recording Industry Association of America to trial. The association has sued more than 20,000 consumers since 2003, warning them they could face fines of up to $150,000 per song for downloading copyrighted music off the Internet without paying for it. The industry blames such file-sharing for a precipitous sales decline in recent years. |
Quote:
| ...the RIAA plaintiffs weren't required to show that Thomas had a file-sharing program installed on her machine or that she was even the person using the Kazaa account in question. |



