Quote:
|
Originally Posted by MissZooey
The current one snores sometimes. That's about the worst of it.
|
Be a part of the community.
It's free, join today!
|
Originally Posted by MissZooey
The current one snores sometimes. That's about the worst of it.
|
|
Originally Posted by Will Kane
Remember: the quickest way to a woman's heart is through her rib cage.
|
|
Originally Posted by MissZooey
I found out that he was really, really into Ayn Rand and was the kind of guy who would start a gun club.
|
|
Originally Posted by SomeGuy
My last girlfriend turned out to be obsessive and was only with me cause she wanted someone to have a baby with her. And this was only after we were together for two weeks. I ran the hell away from that relationship.
That and the fact that she had a rotten pussy. Stank to high heaven. |
|
Originally Posted by JudgeSmails
And then he left and built an underwater city while tinkering with genetics. Rapture is your fault!
|
|
Originally Posted by Owen
This thread is exactly why I haven't had a relationship in a while. I'm cautious.
|
|
Originally Posted by erik myers
So in other words, he was a Christian.
|
|
Originally Posted by Cuchulain
Yeah, it's entirely reasonable to broadly paint a little over two thirds of the global population with the homophobe brush. It's not like a large number of them realize they're adherents of a religion based on a radical love for one's fellow man or anything.
Also, why pick on the Christians? The other monotheistic religions have their share of people who don't like gay people. One could easily write something like: In other words, he was a Jew/Muslim. On the other hand, it appears writing such things is widely contrued as anti-semitic/right-wing. But not grossly generalizing and bashing the Christians. That appears to be kosher. |
|
Originally Posted by devincf
Because you stupid cocksuckers run the country.
|
|
Originally Posted by Cuchulain
Actually, no, we don't. Bush and his Neo-Con cronies do. There is a difference. ... It really does not lend itself to the use of condemning all two billion and change of us.
|
|
Originally Posted by Cuchulain
Actually, no, we don't. Bush and his Neo-Con cronies do. There is a difference. First, even pro-war Christians--which is a position I think is untenable--have usually operated under Just War Theory, which this administration has never paid attention to. Second, we tend to believe in absolutist prohibitions on things like torture. Again, that's not something he seems to put much stock in. Also, there is the whole sanctity of life thing. The administration does pay lip service to that but only on the issue of abortion. (During Bush's time as Governor of Texas, he also signed a bil that enables hospitals to pull theplug on patients when those legally responsible for them can no longer afford care.)
Bush and his team just used the lunatic fringe of American Evangelical Christianity to help build their party's base. It really does not lend itself to the use of condemning all two billion and change of us. |
|
Originally Posted by Cuchulain
Yeah, it's entirely reasonable to broadly paint a little over two thirds of the global population with the homophobe brush. It's not like a large number of them realize they're adherents of a religion based on a radical love for one's fellow man or anything.
Also, why pick on the Christians? The other monotheistic religions have their share of people who don't like gay people. One could easily write something like: In other words, he was a Jew/Muslim. On the other hand, it appears writing such things is widely contrued as anti-semitic/right-wing. But not grossly generalizing and bashing the Christians. That appears to be kosher. |
|
Originally Posted by Napoleon14
Will make this short and sweet...
I was married to a girl who only married me as a cover for her true orientation. She left me for her female supervisor at work. Now for the really jacked up part. When I started dating my current spouse(100% hetero), we were talking about our pasts and I mentioned my earlier mistake and after I said her name, my spouse looked at me with a stunned look on her face and started to describe my ex-wife in detail. She then asked me the question that still makes me chuckle even today....."You mean you couldn't tell?" Small world....But I am so much happier |
|
Originally Posted by Chris Kent
I dated a girl for 10 months before finding out she had aspirations of rogering me with a strap-on.
|
|
Originally Posted by Samurai Mike
I knew my girlfriend's name was April before we started dating. But I only just found out (3 months in) that her middle name is May. As in April May.
|
|
Originally Posted by Belethedheliel
Is her sister named June?
|
|
Originally Posted by Ratty
...SCA-related orgies...
|
|
Originally Posted by Greg David
The worst thing I found out about my wife (before she was my wife) was that her sex partner count absolutely dwarfed mine. Like, by a factor of four. In fact, she'd slept with more women than I had. I say "worst" meaning there's nothing particularly bad about that. If that's the worst I have to deal with, I'm good.
|
|
Originally Posted by McIrish
Pardon me did I read that wrong or did you assert that there are over 4 billion christians?
|
|
Originally Posted by Cuchulain
Yeah, it's entirely reasonable to broadly paint a little over one third of the global population with the homophobe brush.
|
|
Originally Posted by Gary Sherman
I used to have one in my less experienced days, but now I'm of the opinion that if an attractive girl in her twenties has zero experience with boys, there might be some deeper personality issue that I should be made aware of. It's not even that I care if they're good at the physical stuff, but it should be a red flag if you're the very first guy to take notice. They might know something you don't.
|
|
Originally Posted by Guttenberg Fan Club
I once dated a girl who told me that she sometimes posts bullshit stories online. For some reason, she got enjoyment out of telling tall-tales about her life to complete strangers that she was most likely never going to meet. Sometimes the stories would be based on some event, but blown out to ridiculous levels. Other times, they were just completely made up in an attempt to be funny or drawn attention to herself.
When I pointed out how stupid this was, she became indignant and called me a schmuck. Such is life, I suppose. |
|
Originally Posted by Guttenberg Fan Club
I once dated a girl who told me that she sometimes posts bullshit stories online. For some reason, she got enjoyment out of telling tall-tales about her life to complete strangers that she was most likely never going to meet. Sometimes the stories would be based on some event, but blown out to ridiculous levels. Other times, they were just completely made up in an attempt to be funny or draw attention to herself.
When I pointed out how stupid this was, she became indignant and called me a schmuck. Such is life, I suppose. |
|
Originally Posted by MissZooey
Oh, this is such nonsense. Do you assume that every woman automatically jumps at every opportunity she has to have sex? Some people just choose not to have sex until they're in their 20s; it has nothing to do with whether or not someone has expressed an interest in them.
|
|
Originally Posted by Gary Sherman
Let me clarify, as to not sound like a pig. I'm not even talking specifically about sex here (who am I kidding though, of course it matters). I'm talking about male/female relations in general (holding hands, being out past 8:30, eye contact). There are a number of perfectly nice girls whom I've encountered that, through a mix of sheltering and/or anti-social behavior, are sort of damaged goods. No matter how much the both of us might try, there's just a big wall of awkwardness between us, and I've learned to not even bother.
|
|
Originally Posted by Anderson
Just because it carries a handbag and makes you call it "Laura" doesn't make it a girl.
|