CHUD.com Community › Forums › THE CHEWERS › The Chewers Catch-All › Editing posts
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:

Editing posts

post #1 of 44
Thread Starter 
This is verboten?
post #2 of 44
Yeah, blame me.
post #3 of 44
Thread Starter 
Naughty, naughty.
post #4 of 44
I wouldn't be Diva if I wasn't surrounded by controversy.
post #5 of 44
Thread Starter 
Or surrounded by penises.

I kid because I love.

Bukkake!
post #6 of 44
We can't edit now?

Edit: Yeah we can. I'm more confused than ever.
post #7 of 44
Quote:
Originally Posted by Big Jim Slade
We can't edit now?
Only up to one hour after you post.
post #8 of 44
Oh, that. I thought that was common knowledge.
post #9 of 44
People should appeal to Nick. In all honesty, there were like 2 people (one of whom doesn't even post anymore) who were really vocal about banning editing because it destroyed the integrity of the boards or some such nonsense. They e-mailed Nick and made a huge fuss. Most people expressed their displeasure with me for my edits, but weren't advocating that the feature be changed. I'll take the heat because my actions were the impetus for the new editing rules, but the blame should partly go to the freaks who blew the whole thing way out of proportion.
post #10 of 44
[EDITED]

So I never thought that my daughter would really

[EDITED]
post #11 of 44
To pressure the owner of the site to alter a feature that everyone uses because of one incident qualifies as blowing things out of proportion.
post #12 of 44
Thread Starter 
Controversy!
post #13 of 44
Quote:
Originally Posted by Diva
To pressure the owner of the site to alter a feature that everyone uses because of one incident qualifies as blowing things out of proportion.
Or poking a retard with a stick. You say tomato, I say tomahto.
post #14 of 44
This shit again? Really?
post #15 of 44
Quote:
Originally Posted by Diva
In all honesty, there were like 2 people (one of whom doesn't even post anymore) who were really vocal about banning editing because it destroyed the integrity of the boards or some such nonsense.
Doesn't bother me nearly as much as the threads that disappear when someone has a meltdown and gets banned. Some retards start a decent thread or 2 (or a thread that becomes decent in spite of the retard) before taking the long walk.
post #16 of 44
IBTL I hope
post #17 of 44
...
post #18 of 44
Quote:
Originally Posted by Diva
To pressure the owner of the site to alter a feature that everyone uses because of one incident qualifies as blowing things out of proportion.
Puh-leaze. To force the owner of the site to alter a feature that everyone uses because you abused it qualifies as BEYOND FUCKING WEAK.
post #19 of 44
That doesn't even make sense.
post #20 of 44
Thread Starter 
My apologies if I inadvertently re-started an ugly fire.
post #21 of 44
You did and that's your limit
post #22 of 44
Kirby gets a pass because of his Wikipedia "titty fuck" definition picture.
post #23 of 44
Since I started on these boards I've always wondered about that avatar. I was ignorant and fresh-faced and asked what it was in an open forum once only to be greeted by scorn. Kirby Drummond went away soon after. Now, the riddle is solved. Thank you Brendan.
post #24 of 44
Thread Starter 
The very first girl I ever slept with --- I titfucked her all the time. Imagine that as your introduction to sexuality. How could it ever be topped? And it's true: I've never known titfucking like that ever again. I've tried it with a few other chicks but it's never been as good. They never had the right size tits, the right softness, the right closeness of proximity. And titfucking has never been its own thing like it was with her. I used to just fuck her tits and then we'd call it a night. Any time since then, it's been used as lazy foreplay or as a quick commercial break between oral and vaginal sex. Life is a downhill roll, let me tell you.
post #25 of 44
Quote:
Originally Posted by Andre Dellamorte
http://chud.com/forums/showthread.php?t=94499

Someone sent me the link. What Diva said about people complaining is false if this was the only thread on the topic. What drives me to respond to stuff like this is that Diva is lying, or writing Diva-truthiness.
Of course someone sent you the link you asked for it. But it's cute how you're always trying to prove me out as a liar. I never said that the vocal people posted in that thread. I said they e-mailed Nick, who in turn PMed me asking about what happened. Great detective work there, buddy.
post #26 of 44
You didn't credit anyone as they'd be revealed as the douchebag that they are. But it' noble that you're protecting your sources. Just like the gossip rags.

Ah, memories... this has been fun. Editing is useful for the draft which is why I suggested people appeal to Nick. But as you said, whatever.
post #27 of 44
Quote:
Originally Posted by Amphibatron
Actually, I sent it. I didn't want to be caught up in the middle of another drama thread, though, and since I've never had a problem with you I didn't feel like posting that link myself. Especially since it exposes a rather ugly incident, but it does shed light on why the edit feature was set to what it is for those wondering. I was actually interested myself, which is why I looked it up in the first place after Andre mentioned it.
Actually there was another thread that talked specifically about the incident and Nick's decision to ban editing. The link you found was a few days later, and was just a bait thread (which I'm prone to fall for).

And despite your intent to not take sides, you provided the link to someone who specifically requested it so he could post it for amusement purposes, and then used it to "prove" I'm a liar. If Andre wants the link, let him search for it himself. So yeah, it's a douchebag move.

*Edit to change "weeks" to "days"
post #28 of 44
Look here's a nice video of a kitten in a box! Look how cute the kitten is! He's in a box! Let's all just get along!
post #29 of 44
Diva, it doesn't matter what you post because you've proven yourself dramatically unwilling to stand behind what you post. You have less than no credibility.
post #30 of 44
You'd think that for a diagram of titty fucking - which can conceivably look like anything the artist wishes it to look like - that the woman would be drawn hotter.
post #31 of 44
Quote:
Originally Posted by Phil!
It looks as if it was drawn by the person who does evacuation illustrations for airplanes. Somewhere there's an airline so awesome, it has instructions on titty fucking located in the seat pocket in front of you.
Wasn't there a movie or something where people would replace those instructional packets with gratuitous ones written and illustrated in the same vein?
post #32 of 44
Even better: the Wikipedia entry for "pearl necklace" has a user-submitted photo of one.
post #33 of 44
Quote:
Originally Posted by Big Jim Slade
Even better: the Wikipedia entry for "pearl necklace" has a user-submitted photo of one.
What I find interesting on the page for Mammary Intercourse, is the slang that targets OTHER countries, depending on where your from:

Quote:
Several slang terms refer to mammary intercourse, such as titfuck or titty fuck in the United States, tit wank or French fuck [1] in the United Kingdom, branlette espagnole (Spanish jerk-off) in France, spagnola (spanish-one) in Italy, Spanish necklace in Canada, and paja rusa (Russian jerk-off) in Chile.
It's a mystery... France, Italy, and Canada all think it's primarily a Spanish custom for some reason.
post #34 of 44
Andre, I have no urge to find the other thread. But feel free to have your anonymous sources do the work for you.

Schwartz is so funny. He's the lame kid who hides behind the bigger, tougher kids and occasionally yells "yeah!" as the others do all the heavy lifting in a fight. You're a non-entity.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Amphibatron
Eh, then I'm a douchebag. I can live with it, and won't feel the need to edit it from existence. Thankfully (meaning thanks to you), that option isn't available to me.
Look, I have no issues with you generally. I enjoy your posts, particularly your animation. But to say you're a non-party in this when you anonymously PMed a link to someone who does have a stake in what's going on is not the best way to avoid getting "caught up in a drama thread".

Quote:
Originally Posted by Phil!
Kirby wins.
That's usually the case.
post #35 of 44
I was hoping that this thread might resurrect the editing feature (I miss my movie journal!) but clearly it has devolved into the inevitable Diva vs. Everyone.
post #36 of 44
But don't you see, Matt ... That's what she wanted! The bitch has tricked us again! So brilliant.
post #37 of 44
So, in case no one's noticed, the Edit function lasts longer than an hour now.

Just thought someone should say thanks, is all.
post #38 of 44
Nick did it for the upcoming draft. Don't fuck it, people.
post #39 of 44
I sent a PM to Nick apologizing for my actions and asked that he reconsider the editing function in light of the draft. I'm posting this to thank Nick for doing so and to assure him and all of you that I will not abuse the function again.
post #40 of 44
Thread Starter 
Did Diva Break The Use Of All Capital Letters Too?
post #41 of 44
Thread Starter 
I typed that in all caps, but only the first letter is capped. What up?
post #42 of 44
I think it's a way to protect against idiots writing their posts in all-caps. Seems a little excessive, though, and makes abbreviations like MLB, NCAA, etc. look weird.
post #43 of 44
Of course they went ahead and worked right there, though. But hey, I can go edit it out!
post #44 of 44
Quote:
Originally Posted by El Tati
We call it "La Turca" = The Turkish.
So i have no clue how this works.
Hey, in the US we call the bird Turkeys... in Turkey they call it a Hindi. WTF?
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:
  Return Home
  Back to Forum: The Chewers Catch-All
CHUD.com Community › Forums › THE CHEWERS › The Chewers Catch-All › Editing posts