Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Barzun
There is a level of people above you (at least one) laughing at you for laughing at me. Who's moving who?
|
Well, I have to run, but I do love the fact that I can't even comprehend a "level of people above" someone. Sounds awfully elitist.
Now, I'll take you seriously for one last second. The difference between FrankCobretti (who is, incidentally, one of the absolute finest posters on this board, and I'm slightly ashamed to have been so cruel to you, since he would not have been) and the rest of the individuals who responded to you was the level of ambiguity in the reply. He was pointing out that it was funny. The rest of us (Schwartz, Chris Wood, Soul Ahn Ice, Graynadian) were attempting to explain the source of the comedy.
The best part about the whole thing (as I told a fellow chewer today after your first terrible post in this thread), is that you could have come in with the same point, but made it constructively. A discussion about why we care what Sherri Shepherd thinks, the role of celebrity opinion in public discourse, and other related issues actually could have been interesting, even if it's been done to death. But, you came in here on a false moral high horse (I'm very certain you've been dismissive or inconsiderate before in your life, and I'd be willing to bet that at times it's involved the stupidity of others) and you got frustrated for it. In fact, you just insulted Soul Ahn Ice for his stupidity, which seems contrary to your general stance in this thread.
Either way, this isn't constructive, and it's ceased being fun. But, seriously, save your chastising next time. There are plenty of people in here willing to engage you in conversation about topics, and as part of that conversation, acknowledge genuine differences of opinion. You just have to be interested in finding it in the first place.