CHUD.com Community › Forums › POLITICS & RELIGION › Political Discourse › Bush is going to veto Apollo "freedom from oil" energy bill
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:

Bush is going to veto Apollo "freedom from oil" energy bill

post #1 of 8
Thread Starter 
... that would also free us from handing our tax dollars over to ExxonMobil, the most profitable business in history.

Aside from the suicidal commitment to burning fossil fuels, giving government handouts to the oil industry -- which has been on its feet for 100 years -- is mystifying and pretty outrageous when you think about it.

Quote:
White House Signals That It Might Veto Energy Bill

By Steven Mufson
Washington Post Staff Writer
Tuesday, December 4, 2007; Page D01

Efforts by members of Congress to pass an energy bill hit another bump yesterday when the White House suggested that President Bush might veto the bill, but Democratic leaders said they would not alter the package assembled last week after intense negotiating over fuel efficiency standards.

Allan B. Hubbard, director of the National Economic Council, said in a letter yesterday to House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.) that the energy package failed to meet criteria he set out in October and that "it appears Congress may intend to produce a bill the President cannot sign."

But after Pelosi met for more than an hour with Hubbard at the Capitol last night, her spokesman, Drew Hammill, said that "the speaker is hopeful that, when the president reviews the final bill language, he will join the business, labor and environmental communities and support this legislation."

Hubbard objected to a provision that would require utilities to use renewable electricity sources for at least 15 percent of their power generation by 2020. The provision would allow utilities to count energy efficiency as up to 4 percent of that amount. Many utilities in the Southeast, especially Southern Co. of Atlanta, have complained that they cannot meet this target, and Sen. Pete Domenici (R-N.M.) said it would make the bill "untenable for many in the Senate."

But Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid (D-Nev.), when asked whether there were enough votes to pass the energy package in the Senate, said: "I think, yes, we do have enough votes. But time will tell."
More at the Washington Post
Quote:
Key features of the New Apollo Energy Act:

* Clean Energy: New Apollo provides $49 billion in government loan guarantees for the construction of clean-energy generation facilities that will produce power from wind, solar, geothermal, biomass, oceans, coal with carbon-sequestration technology, and other sources. The legislation also commits $10.5 billion to research-and-development and investment tax credits for clean energy-producing operations. In addition, it includes a 10-year extension of the current tax credit for electricity generated from clean sources.

* Oil Savings: The boosts for clean energy and efficiency will make it possible to meet New Apollo's call for notable reductions in daily domestic oil consumption -- cuts of 600,000 barrels a day by 2010, 1,700,000 barrels by 2015, and 3,000,000 barrels by 2020. These numbers are estimates of the amount of oil the United States would soon be importing daily from Iraq, Saudi Arabia, and the entire Middle East, respectively, without a change in current policy.

* Fuel Efficiency: The best way to generate energy is to not waste it, so New Apollo includes incentives for American consumers to drive fuel-efficient vehicles, including tax credits for the purchase of hybrid, alternative-fuel, low-emission advanced diesel, and fuel-cell vehicles. It also provides $11.5 billion in tax credits for the automotive and aerospace industries to develop new fuel efficient automobiles and planes, retool existing plants, and construct new plants to manufacture energy efficient vehicles.

* Global Warming and Greenhouse Gas Emissions: New Apollo enacts a proposal similar to the McCain-Lieberman Climate Stewardship Act by capping our emissions of greenhouse gases while allowing companies to purchase and trade credits among themselves to ensure the most cost-effective reductions, and funding research to help industries make the shift to cleaner operations. The bill targets one of the biggest greenhouse-gas offenders -- coal -- by providing $7 billion in loan guarantees for the development of clean coal power plants.

* Clean Energy Jobs: New Apollo will close the existing technology gap with foreign competitors by investing billions of dollars in new federal research into advanced clean technologies, and creating a government-funded risk pool to help struggling start-up clean-energy companies commercialize their products. One study by the Apollo Alliance has found that a substantial federal commitment to clean energy could yield up to 3.3 million jobs nationally.

* Renewable Portfolio: New Apollo contains a Renewable Portfolio Standard requiring all utilities, by 2021, to produce 10 percent of their electricity from renewable energy sources. There is a cost cap set at 3 cents per kilowatt hour for utilities that purchase renewable energy credits required to meet the standard. Revenue from the cost cap is used to fund grants for the construction of renewable electricity generation facilities in states lacking renewable resources.

* Energy Transmission: New Apollo creates national net-metering and interconnection standards that allow homeowners who generate clean energy to reduce their energy bills by feeding surplus electricity back into the grid. New Apollo additionally increases regulatory oversight of energy trading markets, which was a problem during Enron's manipulation of the West Coast energy crisis.

* Does Not Increase the Deficit: New Apollo is revenue neutral, and pays for its provisions by closing abusive corporate tax shelters and loopholes, and through auctioning off some of the allowances under the carbon dioxide trading program.
From Rep Inslee's site.
post #2 of 8
Well, be honest yt, did you REALLY think the president would not do most/all he can do to fight a development thats pretty bad news for the Oil Industry? I mean, sure, one can certainly find dozens upon dozens of cases where the bush administration actually worked as the political branch of Halliburton, Blackwater, Exxon or whatever, but people have obviously grown... well, inured, almost lethargic.
America runs on fear, someone posted on these boards a long time ago. Fear of losing your job, fear of terrorists, fear of losing your money, home, children, fiance or credit. The price for doing anything against these things is far, far too high to 99.9% of all people, especially if they have responsibilities towards their own family, friends or others.
Just hope for the best when the administration changes, or have them shot
post #3 of 8
Word on the Hill is that this thing isn't going to make it out of the Senate. We'll see.
post #4 of 8
anyone have a link to the actual bill? I've exceeded my google searches for the day.
post #5 of 8
Here you go:

http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/bdquer...10:h.r.00006::

Don't spend too much time reading it, though, as the cloture vote in the Senate failed this morning. Didn't even come close. This bill is significantly flawed, and needs a good deal of work before it has a chance of passage.
post #6 of 8
Thread Starter 
It did get close -- 51 votes compared to the 60 it would need for cloture. Khaunshar is pretty much spot on because the only thing keeping our country WAY behind the technology curve among developed countries is the unwillingness of representatives to inconvenience the sluggish and greedy energy and automobile industry.

Call your senator!

Demand that they vote on the Apollo energy bill!
post #7 of 8
51 isn't close -- 9 votes is a huge number in a vote like this, and means the bill is dead in its current form. The House needs to pare it back down to the increase in CAFE standards, which has pretty broad support in both parties. Get that passed, then move on to some of this other stuff.
post #8 of 8
Thread Starter 
None of the increases in CAFE standards (Corporate Average Fuel Economy, or mpg) have impressed me, but I guess I'd take any increase at this point. We're still way behind the rest of the developed world in this respect. The technology is there; the will of the people is there. The profit motive is the only thing making this any kind of issue at all.

It's still a great bill, and those resisting it are beholden to corporate lobbies and as such not doing their jobs for the benefit of the American people.
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:
  Return Home
  Back to Forum: Political Discourse
CHUD.com Community › Forums › POLITICS & RELIGION › Political Discourse › Bush is going to veto Apollo "freedom from oil" energy bill