Quote:
Originally Posted by The LD 
I thought Patterson's interview was interesting, but left the Isbell issue mostly open. I'm sure there are interviews elsewhere that discuss what happened, but I have yet to read them
|
The intro to the Pitchfork article is the first time I've seen it explicitly stated that Isbell was fighting with Hood and Cooley on the road, actually.
I read another interview with Hood recently (I'd link it if I could remember where it was) in which he put a bunch of the blame on New West. BTCD is the last album they're under contract to make for them, and he just lets loose on what a crappy company they've been to work with - they didn't want to release The Dirty South, since it came out so quickly after Decoration Day; they delayed the release of Ibell's Sirens of the Ditch continually due to DBT's release schedule; they've prevented Hood from releasing his second solo album, etc. He says some of the intra-band stress came from Isbell not being able to do release Sirens and do his solo thing.
I agree with misfit about the first two albums. They're just completely different. Pizza Deliverance is the better of the two, but they're both a lot jokier and consciously rednecky than anything they've released post-Southern Rock Opera. Some of the hardcore fans (generally the same people who think Cooley's a god and Isbell dragged the band down) put them above the new stuff, but I just don't get that. They have some absolutely great songs, but even those tend to sound better live with the new lineup.
A Blessing and A Curse is probably my least favorite of the post-SRO albums, and I still listen to it more than either of the first two. I rank The Dirty South and Decoration Day as nearly perfect albums - I don't really prefer one over the other.