Quote:
Originally Posted by heLL pAso 
So you're blaming the Giants D-line's amazing performance on sloppy play?
Football isn't always about pure offensive entertainment, running the perfect routes, scoring lots of TD's, never missing an open receiver, etc. How anybody could watch the Super Bowl and not be able to notice how special the Giants D were playing is a travesty.
|
But here's the thing about those first three quarters, the Giants' D is just one fraction of the game. New England's defense never got pressure on Manning, and yet, that didn't seem to stop him from air mailing practically everything thrown Plaxico's way. Let alone poor receiver play in general from the Giants, leading to poor routes and some God awful plays on the ball.
I don't know what you think about this, but the Patriots D wasn't all that entertaining, or impressive to me, and the Giants offense still couldn't manage more than three points in the first three quarters.
And that's the thing, it's easy to call a low scoring game a defensive struggle, and calling out anyone that didn't enjoy the first three quarters as ignorant. What I think a lot of people here are doing, honestly, is confusing the entertainment inherent in seeing a heavy favorite get their just desserts with the entertainment one finds in a well played game. While the Giants' defensive line played absolutely out of their minds for the first three quarters, the same can't be said for practically any other aspect of the game.
Now, with everything on the line in this game, it's hard to call the first three quarters anything but compelling, but a lot of that is external to the game, and for people that just watch football a handful of times in a year (perhaps even less), it's hard to judge them harshly based on the actual game on the field.