The List of Dumb - Page 14

I have used that same creamer dispenser in the video (or one remarkably like it). The same thing happened to me. "Good job, fucker!"

Splendid. Live - #3 is an instant classic.

"I'm Poon" - "I'll decide if you're Poon" was awesome!

Great.
EXQUISITE!

The video had me laughing so hard in the middle of my school's tech lab that I had to get up and walk away. Well done, sir.

I just wish Hulk had been fighting the good fight against Blu Ray back in December 07. I now have a very expensive HD DVD player that serves no purpose.

Jesus.

Yep... Jesus. Thank's for the message, buddy!

Not to nit-pick you excessively, Kate, but you DO realize that your last two replies to Nick's "Dumb a Day" threads have been in the "List of Dumb" thread instead. Two different threads. I'm just saying.

Oh wow, no, I did not notice that. That is one nitpick I am grateful for, thanks LisaNY. I was just on a huge search for where my "Dumb A Day" posts had gone. Now I know! I think my brain was just seeking out the word "Dumb" on the list of stickied threads, and then I clicked the first thing I saw.

Yes, but - again, not to belabor it - but you didn't notice that your replies had nothing to do with the replies above yours, or that the dates were way earlier? Or that they were talking about other things and not The Hulk or Jesus? I understand that the thread titles are similar, and they're both stickied, but it's probably easiest to just hit "reply" while you're in the thread you want to respond to.

LisaNY,

No, I did not notice. If I had, I would not have replied in this thread. Won't happen again, as this was pretty clearly a unique situation given the fact there are two similar stickied posts. I'll look out for it in the future.

I made a mistake and I'm very hurt about it. I feel sorry with my rice

So in other words, you don't reply to threads while you're IN them? You read about the Hulk and Jesus, and went to a different thread to reply? Okay then. No more questions from me.

Seeing as how I am not sure what you mean by that, I do appreciate the cessation of future inquiries on this topic. Thanks

So you're just going to keep randomly posting shit in any old thread, whether it's the right thread or not? You're going to post stuff about Thread A in Thread B and call it good? And we're just not supposed to bother you about it anymore? Poor wubby. So misunderstood. Doesn't like getting called on a simple request to post within a topic.

I'm going to go out on a limb here and guess that Kate falls squarely into the "not poon" category.

K... Lisa, I am beginning to think you're just trying to give me a hard time. I specifically said it was a unique and one time error I don't intend to make again. Not sure where you're getting this "you're just going to keep randomly posting shit in any old thread" stuff.

Or this: Lisa, care to explain to me whether or not you're even reading my replies? The second you pointed it out to me I (sincerely) THANKED you


I'd appreciate it if you'd display a similar level of sincerity in your replies to me

As far as you're concerned, absolutely correct, JXN

Oh, and hey, Kate? I just got your little PM. Quite frankly, fuck you. Just because you don't care to post with consideration for any other fucking person on this board but yourself doesn't mean anyone has it "out for you." I'm responding publicly because you're not going to hide behind a PM function on me. If you think you can tell everyone in the threads who disagrees with you or points out that you're wrong, "I don't feel like getting into a fight with you, so could we please drop it?" and then re-engage via PM, guess again, chum. Your whole attitude of posting whatever the hell you feel like posting, but when it's pointed out that you're wrong, we get, "I really don't feel like arguing with you, so please stop" is just ludicrous.

And as to whether or not I "have it out for you", do I wish you weren't posting here anymore? Sure. Do I have it "out for you", though? You're not worth my time. I respond to posts of yours that bother me, sure, but if I responded to everything of yours, I wouldn't get any work done. So don't fucking flatter yourself.

NOW we're done.

I am quite a bit taken aback by this, and sort of at a loss because you come across as a fairly friendly and reasonable person in most threads. I'd appreciate it if you'd cut and paste my PM I sent you here in the forum (since you've decided to "make this public", I want the truth of what I sent you out there), as I no longer have a copy in my sent mail.

I said that I thought you may be engaging me here in a less than intellectually honest fashion, given your bizarre replies to me in this thread. What you've said in your past few postings seems completely detached from the reality of anything I've typed here. Are you having an bad day? I ask in all sincerity because if you are, that's cool, and I'd understand perhaps why you're acting like this. I've had bad days sometimes and it's effected my postings. I wanted to let you know how you were coming across so that you could hopefully take a step back and see how you were acting.


In my PM, I also apologized in advance if that were not the case (regarding your gross intellectual dishonesty in how you're talking to me), but wanted to let you know that's how it was appearing to me. I then said "I hope we don't have to be mortal enemies now"

So please forgive me for my polite and reasonable message of confussion at the terrible and borderline-bonkers way you're acting here.

"Hiding behind a PM function"? How about I didn't want to accuse you of being intellectually dishonest in the thread, in case I was wrong about it? I thought that was courteous. But heck, if you want me to put it out in the open, then I will. Judging by your replies to me here , you are simply trying to insult me for your own kicks and are not even reading my responses.


I am oh so tempted to just type "oh, F U " back, but you know what? I am in the right here and I am not going to sink to using swear words just because you're being hateful. Everyone here can see that your replies are not based upon anything I said, and unfortunately I doubt that will reflect well on you. You have friends here, fine, and I guess I have less of them, but that does not make your nasty and outlandish attacks on my accidental misposting of a Dumb a Day comment any less absurd.

As an outsider I am going to say:

LisaNY= long track record of rational and entertaining posts

PK= very short history of being annoying as fuck

Ha ha ha, I'm no outsider, I've been annoyed by Kate from day one

I'm assuming you don't really know what "Intellectually Dishonest" means for as much as you like to toss it around. Or did you mean it about yourself? Because if that's the case - bingo.

And if you think I'm just having a "bad day" and it's coming out in my posts? Check out all the replies I've made to other people around the boards today. THAT would be your answer.

I know what intellectual dishonesty is when I see it. I outlined previously how your posts are totally ignoring anything I've actually said, while complaining about things I never said. That is an intellectually dishonest way to debate someone. You have not addressed ANY of the points I raised in this post:

http://chud.com/forum/showpost.php?p...&postcount=667

That is very telling to me. You just moved straight on to "fuck you, Kate" and totally ignored and glossed over the places I'd just called you out on where you were making up thing's I'd said out of whole cloth. Again, you are really respected around here so I almost hesitate to say this, but it's almost troll like, the way you've acted towards me. Accuse me of saying things I never said, then I respond and call you on it, and you move on to swear words and insults as if nothing happened.

Oh, and you've glossed over (ignored) my one request of you as well

Please cut and past the PM I sent you. You wanted this public. You accused me of "hiding" behind a PM. So please paste it for everyone to see


.... or wait, would it make you look bad when people see how reasonable I was being?

Go ahead and paste it - you have my blessing. As for my copy, I deleted it. I always delete pointless crap.

But if you think I'm going to argue with you point by point about everything in the PM - it's all been stated in several different threads. So, you lose there - I'm not about to re-argue it with you all over again. And really Kate, do you honestly think you posting your PM here is going to make me look bad? Who cares if you were being reasonable? You were WRONG. Just go back and see any post I've ever made to you. Me right, you wrong.

You really are not reading anything I say, it is now clear. I already said I don't have a copy in my sent mail. You are a delightful human being Lisa, thanks for the memories. You have seriously ruined my day here with your attitude. Mission accomplished, I guess? Green box for you.

How can you not have a copy in your sent files? Oh, I get it - you delete pointless crap too.

You have a good day as well, sweetheart.

Lisa.... you have now twice ignored the points I raised in post 667 on this thread. So good work on the stealh trolling here, I hope everyone sees through you like I do. I do not have a copy saved in my sent mail because you have to select that to happen somehow in user CP and I don't know how.

Have a great day

Oooh, I love good detective work, Kate! And projection.

Oh, and in case you don't read MY posts, you can just go re-read all my prior responses to you if you want clarification of what I"m talking about - rather than my re-typing every single exasperating point I've ever made to you.

So! We're done now, right? Because in about two seconds, I'm gonna start charging babysitting fees.

Best film discussion board on the web, folks!

Man, those pictures Nick posts sure are funny...and I really like the commentary he puts with them...

They are! I kind of prefer the "Dumb a Day" to the "List of Dumb", actually. It's nice having something humorous to comment on with each new day

posts #659-679. new list of dumb? well-played, nick!

Poor DSV!!!

It's depressing but not suprising that there is a paranormal romance section at the store. I have a friend who reads PR exclusively. I'm amazed how many retarded titles are out there in this retarded genre(I pity her for her spectacularly bad taste)

"Joe Mantegna Loves the Pussy"

And this:

Fucking gold.

At least it doesn't say Unicron.

A welcome return for the big list. Awesome.

THRUST CRUNCHER and LONELIEST CLOUD are great HALO names as well. Though both are too long for old-school HALO, I *think* they'd fit as Gamertags.

The entire gavel bit is a thing of beauty. There just aren't enough places on the internet that will drop a Beta Ray Bill reference with such a lack of fanfare.

I know he's essentially a household name in these parts, but it was the Cole Hauser reference that got me. Outside of die hard movie fan/geek circles, I'd wager that name means nothing.

I think Vice Squad clearly shows CH has a love/hate relationship with the clit.

NEVER mock those who may or may not have a Duran Duran license plate. Or I WILL rent a giant gavel and go upside your head!

(You know... the DSV *does* have a point about hummingbirds...)

I gotta say, much as I love getting a dumb a day, I missed DSV something fierce while he was away, learning why the Downs bird hums.

Crap, that was a rookie mistake. When I hear Hauser I automatically think Ramrod.

I've never been a Halo guy, but I really hope "Snake Unions" has found its way into that lexicon. See also Skill Set McPherson. Great to see the original "Dumb" form in play, once more, by the way.

No words, send a poet, all that jazzy shit. Glorious.

Really great list as usual. Saw that Cat Fancy magazine with Mantegna in the pet store a while ago and thought about submitting it but had no camera. Nice to see it made it anyway.

DSV asks a poignant question this week. No oxidation as far as I can see Nick. Great list.