CHUD.com Community › Forums › DVD, HOME THEATER, & GADGETS › Chewer Tech › The Semi-Official HDTV Thread
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:

The Semi-Official HDTV Thread - Page 4

post #151 of 183
Quote:
Originally Posted by Richard Dickson
what's the deal on 1080p only really being a benefit above a certain screen size? I've read some articles saying it doesn't really make a difference until you're up over 50", but then I've read other opinions that that's crap.
I'd go to the store and do some comparisons at the proper distance yourself. It all has to do with how good your vision is and how far the TV will be away from you.

I've got a 57" 1080p TV that is something like 15ft. away from my couch and I can only sometimes tell the difference between 720p and 1080p with straight-up video. I usually can tell if text is on the screen though (sports or video games) because it's usually larger for 720p. Depending on your own vision you can sometimes tell that it just doesn't look quite as sharp.

I can't really recommend highly enough to measure the distance that you'll be sitting from the TV and going into a store and checking out a 720p TV and a 1080p TV at the same distance. Most likely you won't notice a huge difference. Of course, the 1080p set may have better other features that make it look better independent of resolution.
post #152 of 183
Yeah - ty Eyeball - I read about that. I've messed with the settings a bit (using the THX calibrator found on some DVDs - I used Nemo) and I don't notice it nearly as much, or perhaps I've just gotten used to it.
post #153 of 183
Thread Starter 
I agree with everything nachos said above. On my 46" 1080p set text is the biggest thing I can notice a difference on over my old 32" set. One thing I have noticed, and this is probably more due to 120 hz, motion on my 1080 set is much better than my 720. Still not perfect (damn LCDs) but better.

If I had the money and was in the market for a new set I would be all over those new LED LCDs from Samsung. They're amazing but damn expensive.
post #154 of 183
So these new LED are supposed to eliminate most of the problems with motion blur?

I recently slightly upgraded and haven't noticed a big enough difference. So next its either get a 120hz or a risky downgrade to a plasma.
post #155 of 183
lcds are coming out now with 240hz technology which should effectively eliminate fast motion blur.
post #156 of 183
Quote:
Originally Posted by billylove View Post
lcds are coming out now with 240hz technology which should effectively eliminate fast motion blur.
The new Samsung LED TV's are 240hz. At least the 8000 series are, I can't remember if the 6000 series is or not, though I don't see why it wouldn't be.

Quote:
Originally Posted by ZombieFever View Post
So these new LED are supposed to eliminate most of the problems with motion blur?

I recently slightly upgraded and haven't noticed a big enough difference. So next its either get a 120hz or a risky downgrade to a plasma.
I wouldn't say getting a plasma is a downgrade. The colours on plasma's ARE better to me and they do like 700 or higher hertz compared to LCD's at 120/240hz.

The only downside I see for plasma's are that they're fucking heavy, the burn in problem (which if you don't leave the DVD menu on 24/7 you pretty much WON'T get it) and that they run hot and suck up power. And the glare issues if you have the TV in a brighter room or one with windows.

But Panasonic makes some pretty good Plasmas. I wouldn't trust a Samsung plasma but Samsung LCD's/LED's, YES!!
post #157 of 183
Quote:
Originally Posted by Richard Dickson View Post
Someone brought it up but I didn't see a definitive answer -- what's the deal on 1080p only really being a benefit above a certain screen size? I've read some articles saying it doesn't really make a difference until you're up over 50", but then I've read other opinions that that's crap. I'm not looking for anything bigger than 42" at this point. Wouldn't be used as a computer monitor, would just have an HD Tivo and a 360 hooked up to it with basic cable (provided free by our apartment complex). A Blu-ray player is a possible future purchase.

So should I save some scratch and go 720p or buck up for the 1080p?
The term for how physically big a pixel is, is called pixel density. Your eye can only resolve so much visual data at a certain distance. If you had a 52" TV with pixel density of an iPhone, it would have a bajillion pixels onscreen and you wouldn't be able to see all of them from your sofa. But you can appreciate how fine the detail of that image is on a handheld device.

A 720p 32" TV has a much finer pixel density than a 720p 60" TV, so in order to really appreciate that 1080p image, you would need to skew larger. 37-40" is where the added pixels of a 1080p image start to really become noticeable. The thing is, you need to have a 1080p signal to really appreciate the added PQ. Sure, 1080i or 720p images will look a bit cleaner on a 1080p screen, but the only place to get 1080p is from a Blu-Ray or HD gaming system (I think.)

With a 42" TV, you could go either way and basically be happy. It's important to note that there are more important things to image quality than the amount of pixels. Color fidelity, shadow detail, viewing angle, contrast ratio, and response time all can mean just as much to your personal enjoyment as the 1080p resolution. It all depends on what your eyes notice.
post #158 of 183
Ended up with a 40" Sharp Aquos. Hooked up a HD antenna and checked out the local ABC affiliate in high-def, and it was amazing. Then I turned on my 360 and goofed around with Madden, and it looked even better.
post #159 of 183
As for me, Samsung is the best LCD TV as for its quality and price. It allows you to do whatever you want on a tv ranging from playing games and connecting your the pc to watching tv programs and blu ray movies.
post #160 of 183
Part of the fun for shopping for anything expensive is the shopping part and how the sales people realize how much of a possible commission they are about to make....
...only for you to tell them you'll come back tomorrow. Only one will win. Its like a crazy reality show.
post #161 of 183
Nevermind, meant to post this in the home theater thread and wasn't paying attention to where I was.
post #162 of 183
Quote:
Originally Posted by Pop Zeus View Post
Sure, 1080i or 720p images will look a bit cleaner on a 1080p screen, but the only place to get 1080p is from a Blu-Ray or HD gaming system (I think.)
DirecTV only broadcasts up to 1080i, but offers On Demand movies in 1080p.
post #163 of 183
How would I go about connecting my MacBook Pro to my HDTV and get both the audio and visual? I understand I need a DVI to HDMI thingy but when it comes to figuring out how to hook up the audio I always get lost. I'm not good with any of this stuff and I don't want to run off and get the wrong thing because I didn't understand what I was reading, so if any of you guys have any experience with this it would be greatly appreciated!
post #164 of 183
Quote:
Originally Posted by Eric Cordo View Post
How would I go about connecting my MacBook Pro to my HDTV and get both the audio and visual? I understand I need a DVI to HDMI thingy but when it comes to figuring out how to hook up the audio I always get lost. I'm not good with any of this stuff and I don't want to run off and get the wrong thing because I didn't understand what I was reading, so if any of you guys have any experience with this it would be greatly appreciated!
Depending on how you're TVs audio inputs work, you'll either need a male-to-male 1/8" TRS cable (like your typical headphone cable), or a 1/8" TRS to Stereo audio cable (like the red and white on typical video composite cables). Plug the 1/8th end into your MacBook and the other into your TV. You may have to use your TVs menu to set the HDMI audio input correctly.
post #165 of 183
So i just hooked up a 47" Vizio 120hz in a friends home and the 120hz I believe is the culprit making everything except for sports look like an oversped silent film. Just bizarre and unsettling.

Recommend turning off the 120hz setting, whatever it is, during anything but sports?
post #166 of 183
I'd just recommend turning it off all the time. The algorithms simply try to 'guess' what images will be there meaning that half of the refreshes are wasted showing you some weird average between two frames instead of what was actually filmed.
post #167 of 183
Quote:
Originally Posted by dontEATnachos View Post
I'd just recommend turning it off all the time. The algorithms simply try to 'guess' what images will be there meaning that half of the refreshes are wasted showing you some weird average between two frames instead of what was actually filmed.
So is this 120/240/480 stuff a horrible fad that the manufacturers got themselves into a dick measuring contest over or will it eventually be worth a damn?
post #168 of 183
Well, 120Hz is actually useful since it provides a way to watch 24FPS and 30FPS content (film and TV respectively) at their native frame rate. Additionally, 120Hz is what allows for 3D TV with active shutter glasses.

Beyond that, yeah they're pretty useless. Although faster refresh rates on LCD should theoretically help eliminate ghosting which was one of the bigger issues with the technology.
post #169 of 183
So... is the thread we'll use to discuss 3D TV?
post #170 of 183
The Semi-Official 3DTV Thread?
post #171 of 183
Oh, nice, should I start a thread? Or is there one? I used the search for threads on 3D TV and nothing came up.
post #172 of 183
Do it now.
post #173 of 183
Quote:
Originally Posted by TzuDohNihm View Post
Recommend turning off the 120hz setting, whatever it is, during anything but sports?
I used to use it for hockey and football, but now I leave it off all the time.
post #174 of 183
Quote:
Originally Posted by billylove View Post
Do it now.

Done.
post #175 of 183
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rob Rocco View Post
I used to use it for hockey and football, but now I leave it off all the time.
Hockey and auto racing seem to me the only things that would justify it.

Holy shit the movies we were watching looked terrible with everything speedramping like some sort of 21st century Ted Turner colorization-type fad had caught on after Zach Snyder got ahold of some classic film.
post #176 of 183
Thread Starter 
Quote:
Originally Posted by TzuDohNihm View Post
So i just hooked up a 47" Vizio 120hz in a friends home and the 120hz I believe is the culprit making everything except for sports look like an oversped silent film. Just bizarre and unsettling.

Recommend turning off the 120hz setting, whatever it is, during anything but sports?
Misnomer. 120 Hz is not what does this. It is the anti-judder processing your set is running that does this. 120 Hz itself generally improves motion blur which is why it helps with sports. The anti-judder processing smooooooths out the picture and makes it look funky (in my opinion).

Do this. Tweak your set so the processing that does the anti-judder is only used in sports or when you push a button. Using it for regular viewing will make shows either look speeded up or like a soap opera (too smooth and unnatural). My set has three Motionflow settings, Low, Medium and High. I use Low for TV viewing at all times. It doesn't seem to impact anything other than sports and tickers (ESPN, CNN, etc...makes them silky smooth). Using Medium or High makes just about everything look weird so I rarely use it. Sometimes I use it on animation because it looks funky to the kids.

I have it turned off completely for BR viewing as I want the picture and presentation as pristine and original as possible.
post #177 of 183
Quote:
Originally Posted by JudgeSmails View Post
Misnomer. 120 Hz is not what does this. It is the anti-judder processing your set is running that does this. 120 Hz itself generally improves motion blur which is why it helps with sports. The anti-judder processing smooooooths out the picture and makes it look funky (in my opinion).

Do this. Tweak your set so the processing that does the anti-judder is only used in sports or when you push a button. Using it for regular viewing will make shows either look speeded up or like a soap opera (too smooth and unnatural). My set has three Motionflow settings, Low, Medium and High. I use Low for TV viewing at all times. It doesn't seem to impact anything other than sports and tickers (ESPN, CNN, etc...makes them silky smooth). Using Medium or High makes just about everything look weird so I rarely use it. Sometimes I use it on animation because it looks funky to the kids.

I have it turned off completely for BR viewing as I want the picture and presentation as pristine and original as possible.
YES! This. Right. Here.

The soap opera/speed issue is a perfect description. I thought it was something besides the Hz issue but couldn't for the life of me figure out which setting to change in the Vizio menu. I don't think Vizio has menu's where you can change the "Motionflow"(SONY bran name) setting. One of the few drawbacks to them.

I'll check it tonight when I get home.
post #178 of 183
So I bought a 60hz Samsung LCD last January, and was very happy with it up through the new year. Nowadays I get very distracted by what looks to be ghosting. Has it always been there and I'm just now noticing it? Or is something in my LCD somehow degrading?
post #179 of 183
That TV I talked about right above? Picture blew out just a few days ago. Warranty expired last month. Tech guy on the phone said it was probably the color wheel, which might cost about 500 bucks to get fixed.

I'm currently trying to talk my girlfriend into just getting a new TV, one that will have less judder/ghosting or whatever you want to call it. Something that can display at 24fps. Trouble is she has absolutely no problem with how the tv looked, and when I tried to describe what was bothering me she just thought I was nuts. It makes me feel a bit neurotic.
post #180 of 183
Quote:
Originally Posted by Richard Dickson View Post

Ended up with a 40" Sharp Aquos. Hooked up a HD antenna and checked out the local ABC affiliate in high-def, and it was amazing. Then I turned on my 360 and goofed around with Madden, and it looked even better.

Richard, you mentioned you were going to stick with basic cable.  My apartment complex also provides basic for free, but Time Warner just charges me the difference for my digital cable package, which is a good $40 credit per month.

 

I got a 37" LG 1080p LCD in early December, and I've found that having the cable network channels in HD is so satisfying that I don't know how I ever lived without them.  Upgrade and you'll hardly ever find yourself tuning into ABC.
 

post #181 of 183

 

Quote:
That TV I talked about right above? Picture blew out just a few days ago. Warranty expired last month. Tech guy on the phone said it was probably the color wheel, which might cost about 500 bucks to get fixed.

 

That's weird.  I didn't think LCDs HAD colour wheels.  That's a DLP thing.

post #182 of 183

okay so i'm thinking about getting in on this ridiculous game of hdtv's.  i've heard the basics, read thru this thread, and watched dlp/plasma/lcd.  now here's what i'm looking for...

 

-  i primarily watch movies.  90% of my TV-use is movies.  the 10% of actual TV-watching is either sports (hockey) or food network.  i've been reading about this whole 120hz thing that i never knew about, so i'd prefer a tv that has the capability of turning this silly thing off (for movies).  you can probably turn it off on any tv, but i thought i saw someone say their tv wouldn't allow it.

 

-  i have a samsung 1080 blu-ray player which is hooked up to the internet and netflix instant watch.  that's really all the use i could want (features-wise).  if the tv happens to be internet-capable and isn't any sort of extra cost, i wouldn't complain.

 

-  i've read that plasma wears out quicker, develops weird image problems, is an incredibly energy sucker.  it's now 2011.  do these problems still exist or have they fixed them?  conversely, i've read that lcd's are problematic in presenting deep contrast ratio's and deep black's.  have they figured this out yet?  and if so (on both the plasma and lcd questions), what are some models or specs i should keep in mind?

 

-  i don't care about wall-mounting.  yes, i might move, but i don't see myself wall-mounting anytime soon.  also, i'm looking for a 1080 in the 40-50" range.  if it was a little bigger and was some tremendous set/sale/deal, i guess i'd check it out.

 

-  i have the most basic comcast cable package.  i don't watch a lot of TV so i don't care if i'm only getting select channels and programs in HD.

 

-  i have a ton of standard def. DVD's and i don't feel like switching them all over to blu-ray anytime soon.  i hear that some tv's look better than others when it comes to playing standard dvd's.  i want one of those ones.

 

-  i'd like something that is going to last.  now i know you can't control the weird issues that plasma, dlp, and lcd all can have, but what's going to have the best longevity?

 

-  dlp.  what's up with these things?  a friend of mine has one and it looks nice from my estimate.  of course, i haven't seen him in a couple years so i don't know what it looks like now.  i hear they're much cheaper and display a much nicer contrast ratio and blacks, compared to lcd.  but i hear they can eventually be annoying with replacing the rear-projecting mechanisms and whatnot.  is that true/untrue?  anyone have any idea what's up with these things?

 

-  and finally, i'm trying not to spend a fortune.  i'd prefer something with financing options or on sale (now that it's post-xmas and post-superbowl).

 

i know that's a lot to take in and request and whatnot.  but i read thru the whole thread and figure'd i'd cover all bases.  i know there's the whole debate about 1080 not mattering until particular screen sizes and whatnot, among other things, so... yeah.  i'm basically looking for the perfect tv.

post #183 of 183

This or this

 

Any suggestions?  Thank you.

New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:
  Return Home
  Back to Forum: Chewer Tech
CHUD.com Community › Forums › DVD, HOME THEATER, & GADGETS › Chewer Tech › The Semi-Official HDTV Thread