I actually already have the HDTV, but I bought it primarily due to wanting more screen-size, not because of clarity. I had someone who worked for Sony who was able to give me a ridiculous discount, so I jumped at the chance. But anyone who knows me personally knows that I don't sweat the details when it comes to HD. Is it nice? Certainly. But my set-up, while nice (surround sound, HD, over 60", etc.) could be a lot better, but I've never cared to invest in the knowledge of what cables to buy, what specific settings to set my sound to, etc. I guess it's just never been that important to nitpick over every fine detail to get the best optimization.
Now, for those who were waiting to make the jump? I totally get it. If I didn't have any next-gen system and the games on the PS3 catered to my tastes (see: they don't to mine; I'm just not a MGS fan or big on things like Final Fantasy, Gran Turismo, Motorstorm, Killzone...). But I already have the TV, have a 360 and a Wii and have limited enough time as it is to get to the games I really want to play, let alone adopt
another system and be behind that much further on games that are sub-par compared to what I'm into.
And just to throw in another monkey-wrench, I was an early adopter of DVD when it first came out, so I'm not strictly coming from a place of resisting change or not recognizing a worthwhile investment when I see it.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Kevin K 
It's not your opinion that's stupid, it's your rationale. If you want to tell me that hi-def formats are too expensive or too niche or whatever, then fine. But too much unnecessary detail? That's like telling your optometrist to make your new glasses three notches weaker than normal because you hate being able to see so clearly.
|
If you paid attention to the bulk of my opinion, you'd realize that the bit regarding too much unnecessary detail was a small setback; it's a minor annoyance (just ask those crazy pr0nstars!), but it's not the main reason I refuse to "upgrade".