CHUD.com Community › Forums › SPORTS, GAMES & LEISURE › Television › The Spectacular Spider-Man
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:

The Spectacular Spider-Man

post #1 of 34
Thread Starter 
I've been a fan of Spider-Man as long as I can remember. I've read the comics, bought the toys, saw the movies. I love the character and think the comics are great combination of superhero pulp and teenage soap opera. However, my first introduction to the character wasn't by reading the comics. That would come a few years later. No, my first time seeing Spider-Man in action was watching reruns of the old 60s cartoons when I was a little kid in the early 80s.

Looking back on the various animated versions of Spider-Man as an adult, I've always felt that each series was entertaining. Unfortunately, they were all missing something that made the comics so special. The 60s cartoons had a great theme song and captured Spidey's wise guy personality perfectly. Unfortunately, the quality of the animation and recycling of certain music and shots became annoying. Spider-Man and His Amazing Friends suffers by being produced when broadcast standards and practices made it impossible for an action series to have much action. Although, the show does get points for creating Firestar. The 90s Spider-Man cartoon started off well enough, but it became annoying when it started to cram every single character of the Marvel Universe into more and more episodes. Spider-Man started to seem like a guest star in his own series.

So, I was skeptical when I heard another Spider-Man series was to be shown on the CW. I was sure that it was going to be mediocre and another failed attempt at doing this beloved character. I tuned in and, after watching the first two episodes, I was pleasantly surprised. The characters have all been tweaked both in looks and in origins, but they all capture the spirit of their comic book versions. The action sequences are very well executed. The first episode has a fight between Spidey and the Enforcers that really impressed me. And the voice over work on the series, such as Robert Englund as the Vulture, is spot on.

When Batman: The Animated Series started in the early 90s, I was thrilled that Bruce Timm, Paul Dini, and the rest of the people at Warner Brothers were able to bring things that made Batman unique in comics into the world of animation. That is how I feel about this incarnation of Spider-Man.

If I went on for too long in this post, I apologize. And I realize it is a little early to be singing the praises of a show that has only aired twice. But I’m just glad that somebody adapted Spidey into an animated series that captures him right.
post #2 of 34
Well whatever the case maybe, it'll be better than MTV's Spider-man. That's for sure.
post #3 of 34
I've watched a couple of clips, and all I see is cheap animation and weird character designs. All the humans have gigantic dead eyes and look like aliens.

post #4 of 34
Like I said, it'll be above MTV Spider-Man regardless of above mentioned pic's cookie eyes.
post #5 of 34
It can't be any worse then "The Batman" and their Joker incarnation:

post #6 of 34
As bad as the Joker looks, I think Marilyn Manson Riddler is worse.
post #7 of 34
Not bad, I agree the animation needs work, but not bad. We'll see how it progresses beyond these first two episodes.

The theme music has gotta go, though.
post #8 of 34
I still found it weird that the Joker had one giant tooth. That's pretty goddamn odd.

And Jameson looks more like Hitler than ever. But Tim you're right, the theme song is outright clown shoes.
post #9 of 34
I didnt think it was too bad. I agree that the extra large pupils are creepy and the theme is fast forwarded automatically on the dvr but the stories and action are pretty entertaining so far. Its nice to see them handle him in High School again since the last few series have him in his early twenties already. Plus, no Mary Jane yet, nothing wrong with that.
post #10 of 34
Thread Starter 
To be honest, I didn't find the pupils all that annoying. However, the mole on Peter Parker's face is another story.

Wadew1, I'd actually watch a full episode before you completely dismiss the show. It's a visually different take on the characters, but they manage to capture the personalities of Spider-Man, his supporting cast, and his bad guys better then any previous animated version.
post #11 of 34
I'm not completely dismissing the show. I just think it has a cheap, ugly look.
I'll watch a couple of shows eventually.
post #12 of 34
Just watched the intro on You Tube and they feature Gwen Stacy and tease Venom. I'm not cool with the potential ideas involving these two characters together.
post #13 of 34
Eddie = bro? And they make him the huge guy in a leather jacket AND Conner's assistant? They're trying to combine way too much iterations of the characters. The movie, the original comics, and the Ultimateverse.

The voicework is pretty sucktastic. Very generic and cheap.
post #14 of 34
I felt it was pretty generic. I have seen aspects done much better by the original Fox Kids animated show, which had A LOT of problems but really got the characterization dead on. The action side of things is done better by this new show, but I found the non-spidey stuff pretty boring and hackneyed.
post #15 of 34
Quote:
Originally Posted by EdHocken View Post
Like I said, it'll be above MTV Spider-Man regardless of above mentioned pic's cookie eyes.
I thought that series was pretty good.
post #16 of 34
You're serious?
post #17 of 34
I like the theme they choose. Spec, tacular, spec, tacular.
post #18 of 34
Quote:
Originally Posted by EdHocken View Post
You're serious?
Yeah. From my memory of watching the series years and years ago, I thought it, more than any other Spidey show, most closely reflected the type of Spider-man stories I read when I was growing up, i.e. in the 90s.
post #19 of 34
I mean whatever floats your boat but I remember watching the premier with a friend of mine at the dorms and we realized how annoying Bendis' dialogue sounded when acted it out. It definately came from the Mamet school of dithering and the cell shading did not help things at all.
post #20 of 34
Did you watch the rest of the episodes? It gets better (at least for me). And I found myself getting used to the cell shading pretty quickly.
post #21 of 34
Like I said, what you like is what you like. I just didn't think it was that good. I mean to me the mid 90s series was way better than the MTV one.
post #22 of 34
Well I watched a couple of episodes and I like it. Still not crazy about the Character designs, but they're growing on me.
They're certainly Nailing the "nothing ever goes right for pete" stuff, though.

He pisses off his friends, he's broke, he can't take good pictures, he gets fired from jobs, etc.
He even smells bad in one episode. Overall it's a fun show.
post #23 of 34
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ali Mohamed View Post
Did you watch the rest of the episodes? It gets better (at least for me). And I found myself getting used to the cell shading pretty quickly.
This cartoon is hand drawn, not cell shaded.

I liked what they did with Sandman. The Osborns look pretty good, while Hammer Head looks a bit weird but OK. This looks pretty good, and is kid friendly which is the most important thing.
post #24 of 34
Quote:
Originally Posted by ElCapitanAmerica View Post
This cartoon is hand drawn, not cell shaded.
He was talking about the MTV series.
post #25 of 34
Thread Starter 
Quote:
Originally Posted by wadew1 View Post
Well I watched a couple of episodes and I like it. Still not crazy about the Character designs, but they're growing on me.
They're certainly Nailing the "nothing ever goes right for pete" stuff, though.

He pisses off his friends, he's broke, he can't take good pictures, he gets fired from jobs, etc.
He even smells bad in one episode. Overall it's a fun show.
I knew you would get on board eventually.
post #26 of 34
I love how the Kids WB's cartoon lineup these days looks almost exactly like it did back in 1999, except with without any semblance of fucking heart.
post #27 of 34
Thread Starter 
Just caught the episode introducing the Sandman and I have to say they had a better grasp of the character then Raimi and company did for Spider-Man 3.

I'm also liking how they had Flint Marko appear in a few episodes of the series before he turned into Sandman. It reminds me of how Batman:TAS introduced Harvey Dent for a couple of episodes and then made him Two-Face.
post #28 of 34
I'm enjoying this latest Spidey cartoon(much better than that abomination that was on MTV)and love the action in each episode. Plus, its great to see Gwen Stacy finally pop up in a Spidey series instead of them constantly using Mary Jane instead.
post #29 of 34
I like the nod to the classic MJ intro they did on the Rhino episode. And I was surprised by the reveal of the "big man". Not my favorite Spidey villain by a long shot, but I have a feeling they're going to make him much more interesting than in the comics.
post #30 of 34
Thread Starter 
Doc Ock was introduced in the episode from this morning and I thought Peter MacNicol did some fine work as the voice of Ock. Just another solid episode from this series.

I even liked the bit where the claws on Ock's tentacles start to spin around like a buzzsaw. I don't believe this was done in the comics before.
post #31 of 34
Now that it's summer and it's baseball or nothing, I've been catching up on the DVRed episodes of this show. And, in my humble opinion, it's easily the best animated iteration of the Spider-Man universe. The characters ring true to their comic origins and I think the writers do a nice job of integrating the various elements of the films and comics (with emphasis being, rightly, placed on the Ultimate version). The animation is just fine. While the characters have relatively simple designs, I think it works within the context of the stylized world they inhabit. Further, as has been noted, the animation is smoothly executed (which is a rarity in television cartoon series) and the action sequences are outstanding. Last night, I watched the episode featuring the first appearance of the Green Goblin and the Goblin/Spidey battle was very well done and kinetic.

So, call me a man-child, but I'm looking forward to catching up with the rest of the first season.
post #32 of 34
I loved this show - hope it returns for a 2nd season.
post #33 of 34
Thread Starter 
IGN has images of Kraven the Hunter and Mysterio for season two of Spectacular Spider-Man.

http://tv.ign.com/articles/897/897024p1.html

It returns next March.
post #34 of 34
Thread Starter 
Season 2 finally starts on Monday.

http://tv.ign.com/articles/968/968710p1.html
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:
  Return Home
  Back to Forum: Television
CHUD.com Community › Forums › SPORTS, GAMES & LEISURE › Television › The Spectacular Spider-Man