CHUD.com Community › Forums › THE CHEWERS › Reader Reviews › Joe Strummer: The Future is UnWritten (2007)
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:

Joe Strummer: The Future is UnWritten (2007)

post #1 of 9
Thread Starter 


JOE STRUMMER: THE FUTURE IS UNWRITTEN (2007) - ****

Young people foolish enough to totally buy into the Punk Rock myth will be quite jarred when they see Julien Temple's new documentary THE FUTURE IS UNWRITTEN. They'll see that the leader of that movement's most musically accomplished act was a long-haired hippie squatter when manager Bernie Rhodes recruited him simply because he "looked the part."

Indeed Rhodes, who had helped create Punk's poster-bad boys in the Sex Pistols (and flaunted his claim as being the "inventor" of Punk Rock), was hoping to capitalize on their success with a new manufactured band.

He carefully choreographed everything from their specialized leather warddrobe, their on-stage rebel personas, and casted struggling rockers who were working pubs nightly for a few measely Pounds in pursuit of rock glory. This was to be Rhodes' glorified "rebel" boy band.

The problem was, when he told Joe Strummer and the rest of The Clash to go "political" with their music, the machine pulled a SkyNet and revolted.

Joe Strummer was much like The Clash in that his future wasn't clearly set down in stone. Born John Graham Mellor to a career British dipomat, he wasn't the good ole bourgeoisie boarding school boy of the suburbs that was expected to become an iconic and influential voice for the disenchanted youth and peoples of a generation.

If we are to believe director Temple, it was Joe's wide childhood exposure to Africa and Latin America, along with his early "freestyle" rock lifestyle, that may have set The Clash apart from the Sex Pistols.....and way ahead.

If Johnny Rotten was spouting nihilistic themes which amounted to dropping F-bombs and crying about "no future," The Clash played with sheer urgency as the self-appointed "heralds" who sought to raise concerns and issues after the failure of governments, the media, and fellow rock acts to address them.

A memorable sequence in FUTURE is when David Lee Roth, a pure incarnation of rock n roll indulgence and vanity if there ever was one, criticized The Clash for being "too damn serious."

Yet with their landmark masterpiece album LONDON CALLING, The Clash were the first Punk Rock band to crash successfully across the pond into American charts and radio airwaves. Of course that giant leap was helped by recording some simply smurfin great music.

Critics have attacked FUTURE's campfire monologues for not telling the audience who these people exactly are, but I think its a small touch of brilliance.

While the viewer will recognize some celebrity faces of inspired Clash fans in Bono, Johnny Depp, John Cusack, and Flea, the rest of the faces belonging to friends and colleagues give about a humanizing portrait not bound by the limitations that such "roles" are given immediately by most rockumentaries. Along with the late Joe Strummer eeriely narrating his life from the grave, via his old BBC radio gig, they are all ghostly voices brought together by this sole burning fire that is the legacy of a rock hero, and a unique epoch in rock history.

But as bright as the fire blazes, it can equally be as deadly. If Strummer can be praised for the budget-pricing of Clash merchandise and records in spite of losing quite a fortune, he could also be quite a bastard. From someone that once remarked "I wouldn't steal money from a friend...I would steal his girlfriend instead," money was nothing to him, but fame was everything. Strummer turned back on pre-fame friends and openly slept with his bandmates' women.

After the Clash defied Rhodes and fired him, they struggled for years in their rise to the top without sacrificing their moral intensity. By the time their hard work paid off with an Americna Top 10 hit in their classic "Rock the Casbah," Rhodes was back, and the creator finally got his way. Strummer's jealousy and ego was exploited, and before ihe realized it, "The Only Band That Mattered" was no more.

Bono is right in that as great as the Clash were, they should have been around longer than 5 years. Then again, there is a poignant moment when the gang, none of them knowing that they were actually working on their last album, are being interviewed. While Strummer goes off about how The Clash will stick around and still rock out their message to the masses, drummer Topper Headon rolls his eyes.

The future is unwritten, but there are always scribbles in the margins.
post #2 of 9
I think I saw this posted on the IMDB forums, and no I can't come up with a single good reason why I bother ever reading those posts outside of the obvious car wreck appeal.

Your review is well written, but vague and scattered. I think if you fleshed it out more it would be much better. An example that really sticks out for me is how you cite two memorable sequences of the movie, but offer little in the way of an actual opinion on them other than that they stood out. The context of when you comment on the second one, the one where Topper rolled his eyes during one of Joe's rants, undermines the significance of the scene by contradicting it in the previous sentence.
post #3 of 9
Thread Starter 
Quote:
Originally Posted by Smeagol View Post
I think I saw this posted on the IMDB forums, and no I can't come up with a single good reason why I bother ever reading those posts outside of the obvious car wreck appeal.

Your review is well written, but vague and scattered. I think if you fleshed it out more it would be much better. An example that really sticks out for me is how you cite two memorable sequences of the movie, but offer little in the way of an actual opinion on them other than that they stood out. The context of when you comment on the second one, the one where Topper rolled his eyes during one of Joe's rants, undermines the significance of the scene by contradicting it in the previous sentence.
Well, I always welcome criticism...so I can improve as a writer...so what you mean "fleshed" out?

As for the Topper scene, I was only making a point to what was being uttered, and how I noticed that one moment to the side. The end was indeed near, and they either were in denial, or didn't see it coming.
post #4 of 9
Quote:
Originally Posted by LatinoInferno View Post
Well, I always welcome criticism...so I can improve as a writer...so what you mean "fleshed" out?
Well, the more I've digested it, the more I don't think you offered an opinion so much as summarized the movie in many places. If you gave us a better idea of how well the movie was made and the story was told then it would be much better. The parts where you describe the use of Joe's radio show throughout much of the movie and the campfire bits are prime examples of the kind of thing you need to do more often. Less summary, more assessment.

Quote:
Originally Posted by LatinoInferno View Post
As for the Topper scene, I was only making a point to what was being uttered, and how I noticed that one moment to the side. The end was indeed near, and they either were in denial, or didn't see it coming.
Yeah, I understood. It's just the way you say one thing in the first sentence like it's a definite fact, and then undermine it with evidence otherwise is jarring. I know I didn't articulate that better above, so my mistake there.

Definitely keep it up, though. Just needs work.
post #5 of 9
Thread Starter 
Well, thanks for your fair assessment, and yes you are right.....less summarizing.

Let's put it another way for THE FUTURE IS UNWRITTEN...."powerfully nerving documentary about a rock icon who's music with The Clash has inspired both the layman and the artistic on both sides of the Atlantic, of which they share their feelings and recollections around a campfire."

Eh, I need to work on that...
post #6 of 9
Quote:
Originally Posted by LatinoInferno View Post
Well, thanks for your fair assessment, and yes you are right.....less summarizing.

Let's put it another way for THE FUTURE IS UNWRITTEN...."powerfully nerving documentary about a rock icon who's music with The Clash has inspired both the layman and the artistic on both sides of the Atlantic, of which they share their feelings and recollections around a campfire."

Eh, I need to work on that...
Heh, you'll get it. Just keep practicing.

Anyway, documentaries are difficult to review without summarizing a lot anyway I'd imagine.
post #7 of 9
Thread Starter 
Quote:
Originally Posted by Smeagol View Post
Heh, you'll get it. Just keep practicing.

Anyway, documentaries are difficult to review without summarizing a lot anyway I'd imagine.
Basically, but my problem with my reviews is that I don't want simply to make a laundry check-list of what worked, what didn't. I usually write free-fall, edit from there, and post. Those stars my lazy ass depends on, sometimes carry me, as if "Here's my score, and here's why."

How is my other reviews? They have the problems as FUTURE IS UNWRITTEN?*

*=Also, you seen FUTURE?
post #8 of 9
Quote:
Originally Posted by LatinoInferno View Post
Basically, but my problem with my reviews is that I don't want simply to make a laundry check-list of what worked, what didn't. I usually write free-fall, edit from there, and post. Those stars my lazy ass depends on, sometimes carry me, as if "Here's my score, and here's why."

How is my other reviews? They have the problems as FUTURE IS UNWRITTEN?*

*=Also, you seen FUTURE?
I haven't read any other reviews yet, but I may if I find the time.

To answer your other question, I have seen it and I liked it quite a bit. The Clash are a band that mean a lot to me personally, especially Joe, so it was very resonant for me in spite of its flaws.
post #9 of 9
Saw this with Matchstick* last night. Really enjoyed it and it made me realize how little I knew about the formation of the Clash and how huge they really got while they were still together, rather than having their reputation grow after the fact. I also liked the lack of labels for the interviews around the campfire, how the viewer was left to learn how each person they didn't know offhand fit into Strummer's life by the story they told.

After seeing it, I realize Strummer wasn't quite the guy I thought he was, and I may be a bigger fan for it. Well worth your time if you've got any interest in the man. If you have no interest in the man, you're probably a goob.


*Name-Droppin' Misfit, part of the Chewer action figure line.
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:
  Return Home
  Back to Forum: Reader Reviews
CHUD.com Community › Forums › THE CHEWERS › Reader Reviews › Joe Strummer: The Future is UnWritten (2007)