New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:

So...

post #1 of 46
3/29/08 at 5:04am
Thread Starter 
....where's that Kristen Bell photo shoot from which the main page article about Will Arnett gets its image?
Reply
post #2 of 46
3/29/08 at 5:05am
Quote:
Originally Posted by Overlord View Post
....where's that Kristen Bell photo shoot from which the main page article about Will Arnett gets its image?
Let's not keep the Overlord waiting folks.
Reply
post #3 of 46
3/29/08 at 5:29am
Well, the filename is kristenbellcomplex.jpg, so...
Reply
post #4 of 46
3/29/08 at 10:41am
Those are some fucking ENTRANCING photos.
Reply
post #5 of 46
3/29/08 at 10:58am
Once again Overlord's avatar is very fitting.
Reply
post #6 of 46
3/29/08 at 1:43pm
Thanks for the link Amphibatron, the first one there is quite nice.

Reply
post #7 of 46
3/29/08 at 1:54pm
She clearly has issues with her hair.
Reply
post #8 of 46
3/29/08 at 2:57pm
Thread Starter 
Many thanks!
Reply
post #9 of 46
3/29/08 at 3:12pm
ass ass titties titties ass and titties
Reply
post #10 of 46
3/29/08 at 4:03pm
Too bad she's so remarkably generic looking.
Reply
post #11 of 46
3/29/08 at 4:38pm
Andrew Collins' girlfriend:

Reply
post #12 of 46
3/29/08 at 5:43pm
Yowzer. I have never seen anything starring Kristen Bell, but she is anything but generic looking. She's, as we say in England, "well fit".
Reply
post #13 of 46
3/29/08 at 6:37pm
Quote:
Originally Posted by Andrew Collins View Post
Too bad she's so remarkably generic looking.
Is this code for "Too bad she's not a guy."?
Reply
post #14 of 46
3/29/08 at 6:41pm
She's very very pretty, and has an ass like dat, but I don't get all the hyperbole. Maybe it's just her face, which I don't particularly care for (again, not ugly, just not great) or the whole blonde thing (never been big for blondes) but I'm not drooling or anything. She's no Paula Poundstone.
Reply
post #15 of 46
3/29/08 at 6:54pm
I agree, she's not unbelievably beautiful. She is, however, incredibly sexy, and CHUD's (or is it just Jeremy's?) dedication to posting the choicest pictures in news items about her has given me an appreciation I did not have previously.
Reply
post #16 of 46
3/29/08 at 6:55pm
I'm not usually one for blondes either but as a leg man, this shot...



...is more than enough to earn the seal of approval.
Reply
post #17 of 46
3/29/08 at 8:17pm
Why is it that capable actresses are pressed to dress like strippers for publicity photographs? It seems incredibly demeaning to me.
Reply
post #18 of 46
3/29/08 at 8:37pm
Especially when there's plenty of people with no talent willing to demean themselves wearing a lot less.

In any case, as chivalrous as the question is, I don't think these actresses are pressed to do anything. They're offered a "demeaning" idea, some run with it, some don't. But I doubt the female celebs out there who would feel like their integrity's been compromised by this sort of thing would just surrender to it for the paycheck.
Reply
post #19 of 46
3/29/08 at 10:16pm
Quote:
Originally Posted by Justin Clark View Post
But I doubt the female celebs out there who would feel like their integrity's been compromised by this sort of thing would just surrender to it for the paycheck.
Reply
post #20 of 46
3/29/08 at 10:44pm
By that, you're assuming Halle Berry had integrity to be compromised to begin with.

For Christ's sake, she made BAPS.
Reply
post #21 of 46
3/29/08 at 10:54pm
bap bap bap
Reply
post #22 of 46
3/29/08 at 11:04pm
As a non-fan of blondes, it pleases me to say I would make TONS of babies with Ms. Bell.

Anybody know where that photo of Mila Kunis used in the Max Payne new item came from? God knows I tried to find out.
Reply
post #23 of 46
3/31/08 at 8:15pm
Quote:
Originally Posted by Scott View Post
fap fap fap

Fixed.
Reply
post #24 of 46
3/31/08 at 8:18pm
Quote:
Originally Posted by BTSMGL View Post
As a non-fan of blondes, it pleases me to say I would make TONS of babies with Ms. Bell.
I don't think that I want all those babies, but I sure want to do all the practicing.
Reply
post #25 of 46
3/31/08 at 9:12pm
Quote:
Originally Posted by FrankCobretti View Post
Why is it that capable actresses are pressed to dress like strippers for publicity photographs? It seems incredibly demeaning to me.
It is incredibly demeaning, but it's their own damn fault. All you have to do is look at the awesome talented actresses in the world who don't whore themselves out to see that. Some people (okay, most people) are just weak willed sheep who will do anything for a paycheck.
Reply
post #26 of 46
3/31/08 at 9:52pm
Quote:
Originally Posted by Aranion View Post
Fixed.
The point was somewhere back there. I think you may have missed it.
Reply
post #27 of 46
4/1/08 at 4:43pm
Quote:
Originally Posted by Werewolf Girl View Post
It is incredibly demeaning, but it's their own damn fault. All you have to do is look at the awesome talented actresses in the world who don't whore themselves out to see that. Some people (okay, most people) are just weak willed sheep who will do anything for a paycheck.
Well, those paychecks are huge. I bet Jessica Alba made most of her fortune with photo shoots. If I were a woman with that body (and that lack of acting talent), I'd probably do it exactly the same.
Reply
post #28 of 46
4/1/08 at 5:58pm
Okay, you've got me there. Really, what else is she going to do?
Reply
post #29 of 46
4/1/08 at 6:11pm
Lick my butthole.
Reply
post #30 of 46
4/1/08 at 7:14pm
Seeing your Kevin Gage avatar and that comment.... wonderful synergy.
Reply
post #31 of 46
4/1/08 at 11:37pm
By the same token, it's demeaning to these women to assume that they're powerless to resist the "dress up in a bikini for a photoshoot" urge. I'm sure it pays well, and I'm sure there are women out there who would rather not do it. By the same token, you're painting with an awfully broad brush to assume that some decent percentage of these women don't think "Hey, I'm young and beautiful and this is going to be fun." I'm saying this as someone who hasn't so much as seen the inside of a Maxim or Playboy or what have you in the last five years.

The part of the equation that I have trouble is the way the "interviews" are mangled to make the women appear as sexually available as possible. I find that a lot more problematic than the photographs themselves, because (1) it discounts their other qualities in the way that a photograph can't, and (2) it tells you something about the mentality of the readership that's anything but flattering.
Reply
post #32 of 46
4/8/08 at 9:52pm
Reply
post #33 of 46
4/8/08 at 11:26pm
Man, look at those legs.
Reply
post #34 of 46
4/9/08 at 3:28am
Wow, they go ALL THE WAY UP!
Reply
post #35 of 46
4/9/08 at 12:31pm
Yeah, excellente legs. But the airbrushing is downright obscene, I could be looking at CGI for all I know.
Reply
post #36 of 46
4/10/08 at 11:33am
Ms. Bell appears to be weightless. There is no gluteal compression on that swing.
Reply
post #37 of 46
4/10/08 at 4:33pm
It's so funny to see you guys talking about Bell's legs. Kristin's a midget.* She's like 5'1" tops.


*I can say that because I'm a midget too.
Reply
post #38 of 46
4/10/08 at 4:43pm
Quote:
Originally Posted by Diva View Post
It's so funny to see you guys talking about Bell's legs. Kristin's a midget.* She's like 5'1" tops.


*I can say that because I'm a midget too.
I think that first comment was made by McNooj - it's his old avatar.
Reply
post #39 of 46
4/10/08 at 5:02pm
Quote:
Originally Posted by Diva View Post
It's so funny to see you guys talking about Bell's legs. Kristin's a midget.* She's like 5'1" tops.
It's not as though we're amazed at how big they are.
Reply
post #40 of 46
4/10/08 at 5:17pm
Comments like "they go all the way up" suggest length. That she don't got. Nicely toned thighs and calves, I'm with you.
Reply
post #41 of 46
4/10/08 at 5:19pm
It's all in that golden ratio. Some short women have long legs and some tall women have short legs; such is the english language.
Reply
post #42 of 46
4/10/08 at 5:46pm
Quote:
Originally Posted by Graynadian View Post
some tall women have short legs
I saw a woman at the gym the other day who's torso was twice as long as her legs. She was sitting on the ground stretching and her boobs went past her feet. It was fucking hilarious.
Reply
post #43 of 46
4/10/08 at 5:47pm
Was she some kind of little person?
Reply
post #44 of 46
4/10/08 at 5:51pm
No she was quite a tall person (her legs were longer than mine), but she had a very loooong torso.

I've recently discovered at 5'0", I'm 2 inches away from being legally defined a midget. Yea for me!
Reply
post #45 of 46
4/10/08 at 11:45pm
Quote:
Originally Posted by Diva View Post
Comments like "they go all the way up" suggest length. That she don't got. Nicely toned thighs and calves, I'm with you.
That comment was probably facetious.

In Portugal we have a saying: "She's got legs all the way up to her ass". It's meant to be the blandest of compliments.
Reply
post #46 of 46
4/17/08 at 11:32pm
As of today, I had no idea who this woman was. I do not keep up with celebrity news. This thread and IMDB both have made my day. When I saw pics, to say I drooled is not right. Its more like my mouth became Niagara Falls.
Reply
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:
  Return Home
  Back to Forum: Sex