CHUD.com Community › Forums › THE CHEWERS › Reader Reviews › Year of the Dragon (1985)
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:

Year of the Dragon (1985)

post #1 of 23
Thread Starter 


YEAR OF THE DRAGON (1985) - ***1/2 out of 5

Twenty years ago, Mickey Rourke was being cited as the next Marlon Brando for his masculine presence and pure acting charisma that he exhibited on the big screen. Unfortunately, he did end up as the next Brando, at least in the knack for picking terrible scripts and working for the easy paycheck.

Like Brando in ON THE WATERFRONT, he could have been an acting contender, but he blew it.

But before the downfall, Rourke teamed up with disgraced Oscar-winning filmmaker Michael Cimino in the adaptation of Robert Daley's crime boiler YEAR OF THE DRAGON. Ironically, Rourke was playing a character that is as old as Rourke is now and ignoring the boxing scars on his face, its eerie in how they both display the look of bitter vinegar disapointment with the lousy cards they've been dealt in life.

Rourke convincingly portrays a middle-aged man in spite of the fact that his make-up isn't convincing, yet it doesn't matter.

Playing a burned-out Vietnam veteran-turned NYPD cop of a Polish-American, Rourke is a man very cynical of the "system," and his days fighting the NVA in the jungles have left him with a angry hostile prejudice against all Orientals. He's fought a losing war before, but he's determined to win this new war at all costs against Chinese Triad leader John Lone. He's practically "Charlie" in Rourke's eyes.

Lone is excellent as the villain that's equally unwilling to backdown, and damn he's a great actor that deserved a better Hollywood career. With a great grasp on the English tongue, he takes a one-note villain part and turned it into a memorable performance.

He conveys such great presence of intelligence in contrast to Rourke's masculine aura. Maybe the best scene in the film is when he's being openly mocked by his fellow Triad mobsters, and he has to quietly take it. Yet without dialogue, his eyes tell us that he will strike back at his new enemy....

I think its a shame that writer/director Michael Cimino has been permanently blackballed by Hollywood over the HEAVEN'S GATE fiasco. I mean it's pretty much his fault for GATE's infamous overspending, but like John Carpenter and John Milius, I just hate seeing good talent not being utilized today. They're too good to be wasted, and yet they are.

Cimino shoots a compelling melodrama about a cop that will wage an uncompromising dirty street war and will suffer harshly for it, with an emotional toll that exausts the viewer. He has some stuff in his script that I don't care, from the DIRTY HARRY simpleton portrayal of the news media to a random shot of an American flag.

Is this cheap emotional pull this side of Spider-Man or some misplaced patriotic righteousness of the hero? Maybe its both. Nevermind that the female lead is nice tits without any acting talent, such pretty dead space. She's a breathing prop for Rourke.

Alot of people dismissed YEAR OF THE DRAGON, saying that its a very racist movie against Chinese-Americans and they just totally missed the whole point. There is a difference being racist, and simply have the gall to have a flawed racist hero this side of John Wayne in THE SEARCHERS.

Cimino and Rourke teamed up to create a good little tale about a soldier who fights an enemy so much, he ends up falling in love with one of them.
post #2 of 23
Thread Starter 
What, no half-ass smart-ass posting from anyone?

I sure hope I haven't worn you all out during my work clinics here at CHUD.
post #3 of 23
A 9 1/2 Weeks review would be nice. Never saw Year of the Dragon.
Though I did skim through the book which it was based on.
post #4 of 23
Thread Starter 
Quote:
Originally Posted by felix natalya View Post
A 9 1/2 Weeks review would be nice. Never saw Year of the Dragon.
Though I did skim through the book which it was based on.
You know, I've never seen 9 1/2 WEEKS. I need to change that fact.

Keith Fordyce - Hey, I reviewed an obscure title. Bitch.
post #5 of 23
Quote:
Originally Posted by LatinoInferno View Post
I sure hope I haven't worn you all out during my work clinics here at CHUD.
I don't know what the fuck you're talking about (work clinics???), but we've talked about this movie a lot in the past. It probably doesn't exist anymore, but there was a thread made last year that discussed it in detail. It's a wild, strange movie that doesn't really "work," but it's one that I can't help not to love. Rourke is tremendous in it.

Quote:
Originally Posted by LatinoInferno View Post
I reviewed an obscure title.
No.
post #6 of 23
Thread Starter 
Quote:
Originally Posted by Parker View Post
I don't know what the fuck you're talking about (work clinics???), but we've talked about this movie a lot in the past. It probably doesn't exist anymore, but there was a thread made last year that discussed it in detail. It's a wild, strange movie that doesn't really "work," but it's one that I can't help not to love. Rourke is tremendous in it.
I don't know what you mean by "work."

But yeah, Rourke was tremendous....and to think, he was playing the age at the time that he roughly is right now.

Weird really.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Parker View Post
No.
Yes.
post #7 of 23
Not so obscure. This is CHUD. It's a Michael Cimino flick.

I can't tell if you're just an ordinary troll or if you really think you're going to save us from ourselves. In either case, we're good, you can move on.
post #8 of 23
Thread Starter 
Quote:
Originally Posted by Keith Fordyce View Post
Not so obscure. This is CHUD. It's a Michael Cimino flick.
And that's not obscure?

Mark L. Lester is obscure!
post #9 of 23
Again, no.
post #10 of 23
Thread Starter 
Quote:
Originally Posted by Keith Fordyce View Post
Again, no.
STEEL DAWN?
post #11 of 23
Thread Starter 
Quote:
Originally Posted by LatinoInferno View Post
STEEL DAWN?
Yup, I won.
post #12 of 23
You are answering to yourself now?

You just dropped a star.
post #13 of 23
Thread Starter 
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tati View Post
You are answering to yourself now?

You just dropped a star.
Wasn't I already in the negative scores according to you?

Goddamn, be consistent at least.

Anyway, I won via Countout at 1:24.
post #14 of 23
Steel Dawn, are you kidding me? Maybe Tiger Warsaw, maybe.
post #15 of 23
Thread Starter 
Quote:
Originally Posted by Keith Fordyce View Post
Steel Dawn, are you kidding me? Maybe Tiger Warsaw, maybe.
Sorry, no rematch. LI still retains the belt.

*Dances*
post #16 of 23
Are you and Danco_2000 the same person?
post #17 of 23
Thread Starter 
Quote:
Originally Posted by GET AIDS NOW! View Post
Are you and Danco_2000 the same person?
Sure.....if I know who the hell Danco_2000 is. Then again, I'm surprised you didn't suggest Duke Fleet or Anderson or Tati.
post #18 of 23
Quote:
Originally Posted by LatinoInferno View Post
Sure.....if I know who the hell Danco_2000 is. Then again, I'm surprised you didn't suggest Duke Fleet or Anderson or Tati.
Don't bring me into this shit, pal.

Also, if you're going to do Cimino...pick something that doesn't get touched as much.

Thunderbolt and Lightfoot? The Sicilian? Go for the gusto, man.
post #19 of 23
Even DESPERATE HOURS would make for an amusing thread.
post #20 of 23
I loved Year of the Dragon. The direction is extremely sharp and rich, proving (to me anyway) that Cimino hadn't crashed and burned yet. And Rourke, as always back then, was excellent. A couple of weeks ago I watched Walter Hill's Johnny Handsome with Rourke. I didn't like it when it came out but man, that movie stands the test of time. A great neo noir flick with Ellen Barkin as the devious femme fatale and Elizabeth McGovern as the Rourke's chance to go straight. Also, awesome supporting cast in Morgan Freeman, Forest Whitaker, Lance Henriksen and Scott Wilson. Recommended.
post #21 of 23
When I met Scott Wilson after the AFI/Arclight screening of THE HOST, I gushed how much I loved him in the extremely underrated JOHNNY HANDSOME. He seemed quite pleased by that.
post #22 of 23
I could talk to Scott Wilson for hours, and then he'd call security and have me dragged away.

I'll echo the Johnny Handsome love. Tracked down a European DVD widescreen, it's nice.
post #23 of 23
Bigtime Rourke fan. Shame he couldn't keep his thing going. Can't thing of many stars who go from epitome of cool to joke in half a decade. Anyway, love YEAR OF THE DRAGON. Understand the controversy. It IS politically incorrect. But I don't get the charge that it's flat out racist. I think people tend to confuse the actions/beliefs of characters w. movie's message. Am I wrong?
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:
  Return Home
  Back to Forum: Reader Reviews
CHUD.com Community › Forums › THE CHEWERS › Reader Reviews › Year of the Dragon (1985)