CHUD.com Community › Forums › VIDEO GAMES & RPG › Video Games › The Semi-Official PC Gaming Thread
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:

The Semi-Official PC Gaming Thread - Page 2

post #51 of 374
post #52 of 374
Like I said...

Quote:
Originally Posted by billylove View Post
You have to sacrifice babies to run Crysis at max settings.
post #53 of 374
Do you feed them to the PC?
post #54 of 374
Quote:
Originally Posted by stelios View Post
Vista 32, to my knowledge, is great although a bit worse performing than XP 32. It's the 64 bit versions that aren't that good.
I'm dual-booting XP 32 and Vista 64 and haven't had any issues with gaming under Vista. Admittedly I've only used it for Company of Heroes, the Crysis demo, and Stalker (when a weird paged pool file error made Stalker crash at full detail under XP, which has since been fixed with a Microsoft hotfix), but they all ran great. The only real issue is drivers. I had to do some heavy internet digging to find a decent driver for my sound card and any driver at all for my wi-fi card.
post #55 of 374
Well I got lucky, and my old man was in a good mood and agreed to split the cost a nice laptop with me, so I should be back in commission soon. My question now is should I stick with Vista or install XP? The laptop comes with Vista but I have had nothing but pains in my experiences with Vista. Is there anything from it worth salvaging it?
post #56 of 374
For the whole vista/xp debate, I personally run both (32 bit versions of each at the moment) and I have to say I really have no problems with gaming under vista.

To be fair my PC is barely 6 months old but I find once you get a real feel for the OS and its personal quirks, I actually prefer it to XP. At this point I only keep XP on this machine for avid/pro tools, otherwise I would happily go the complete vista route. I think if you're building a new machine it's a very stable OS, it's just not so kind to older systems.

That said, I've been gaming pretty much exclusively on the PC since the 'end' of the last console generation. I plan to eventually make the jump into the new formats with a PS3 purchase (metal gear 4 bundle) but right now I'm pretty content with the choice of PC titles.

My main games in rotation are Assassins Creed and Sins of a Solar Empire, but I'll be picking up Mass Effect and Age of Conan next month. Not to mention we're seeing Spore and Fallout 3 this year.

Now if only Grand Theft Auto 4 had a solid PC release date...
post #57 of 374
presently in the process of building some kind of quad core thing to play last years games on...still deciding on what video card to throw in there. Spending an unhealthy amount of time looking at Tom's vga charts.

I just got turned on to Trackmania today. Mainly because it's free and somewhat of a blast to play. Grab it off steam if you already haven't done so.
post #58 of 374
Thread Starter 
I came here to tell everyone about Trackmania. I downloaded it yesterday just to try it out and ended up playing about two hours. Completely arcade but very fun. And it's free.

That's what I love the most about PC gaming. Stumbling by accident on games like that. PC developers that don't feel the need to monetize every single bit of content they make and offer for free stuff they could easily charge upwards of 10$. Right now I'm playing three full games only one of which isn't free. I feel like I'm getting the deal of the century.
post #59 of 374
I'm no fan of racing games, unless they have the words Death and Rally in the title, but I love TrackMania Nations Forever. It runs surprisingly well on my machine and it's arcady enough for me to enjoy. Oh, yeah and it's completely free. Highly recommended.
post #60 of 374
Quote:
Originally Posted by mongycore View Post
presently in the process of building some kind of quad core thing to play last years games on...still deciding on what video card to throw in there. Spending an unhealthy amount of time looking at Tom's vga charts.

I just got turned on to Trackmania today. Mainly because it's free and somewhat of a blast to play. Grab it off steam if you already haven't done so.
Even though it's a few months old now, I'd still recommend an 8800GT (512) for around $200.00. Still probably the best bang for the buck.
post #61 of 374
Thread Starter 
So according to Kotaku the DRM on the PC version of Mass Effect will need to reactivate the game every 10 days by connecting to an EA server. WHAT AN EXCELLENT IDEA! Meanwhile some 16 year-old douchebag is gonna be playing the pirated version for free.

Fuck this nonsense, I have better ways to spend the 50 € I was gonna give them.
post #62 of 374
So my desktop is officially screwed, and I'm ordering a new quad core mofo desktop today for my birthday.

So what games do I need to catch up on? Crysis is on my list, as is Age of Empires 3. Should I be holding out for the updated Witcher?
post #63 of 374
Thread Starter 
Definitely yes for the Witcher. The Orange Box, COD4 and Bioshock are also a must if you haven't played them on a console. Try S.T.A.L.K.E.R. if you're in the mood for something different. If you like strategy give Sins Of A Solar Empire a try. Also less strategic but also fun are Relic's RTSs. Company Of Heroes and its expansion not to mention my personal favorite Warhammer 40000: Dawn Of War. For the last there's a great bundle of the original game plus the three expansions for really cheap.
post #64 of 374
Pre-ordered Age of Conan at Best Buy, so there's a war rhino waiting for me at level 40! Word is the head-start folks can download the client on the 14th and start playing on the 17th.
post #65 of 374
Thread Starter 
Quote:
Originally Posted by Richard Dickson View Post
Pre-ordered Age of Conan at Best Buy, so there's a war rhino waiting for me at level 40! Word is the head-start folks can download the client on the 14th and start playing on the 17th.
I'm thinking about it, too. I felt kind of fed up with MMOs until I learned that one of the quest hubs in Conan is a brothel named 'The Bearded Clam'. Now I think that I'm morally obliged to play.
post #66 of 374
So, to those who were planning on picking up Age of Conan, how was launch?

I tried to play during beta but my computer couldn't handle it. What little I saw and read about didn't convince me to buy a new system, but I'm still curious about other people's takes.

I'd like to check out their message boards for reactions but you have to own a subscription to the game and be registered to view them (which seems odd.)
post #67 of 374
Thread Starter 
Age Of Conan isn't coming here until the 23rd. I also might wait for some early reviews before buying it. I still remember the money I've spent on Anarchy Online at launch.
post #68 of 374
They'll be opening up the message boards for everyone eventually, but they want to keep it confined to players during launch.

I know some folks were ticked off about the early access selling out, and there was a lot of downtime during the three-day head start, but I had absolutely no problems yesterday, and from what I heard the launch was pretty damn smooth. There's an issue with the traders (bankers) not working, the game isn't DirectX10 compatible yet, and there's apparently a zone that people are stuck in, but Funcom is aware of all of these issues and working on them.

I'm having a lot of fun with it so far, although I'm still in the introductory area. There's tons of quests to do, and the combat system is much more involving than a lot of other games.
post #69 of 374
Thread Starter 
Good to hear that. I hope everything turns out OK because as an R.E. Howard fan I'm itching for some Hyborean action.

By the way what are you playing? And does the game have joint US/EU servers? I'd love playing with other Chewers.
post #70 of 374
Thread Starter 
Age Of Conan has proven so far to be a wise purchase. If you're playing a melee class, it's quite unlike any other MMORPG out there. At least for the class I'm playing (Dark Templar) it's better to be outnumbered in a fight. In WOW if you're level 18 and fighting 5 level 17 mobs you're basically toast. In AOC because you can fight multiple enemies, especially if you're using your combos, being outnumbered is something you almost always seek. Not to mention how great it feels seeing 4 or 5 bloody bodies lying around with you still at over 50% health.

The fatalities are great too. So far I've found four. If you have a sword there's a decapitation, there's one where you drive your sword straight through his heart and out his back and one where you go all sushi chef hacking away like crazy. But the best one yet happened with a hammer. You kneecap your opponent and as he falls on his knees you start banging on the top of his head with your hammer. I actually applauded the first time this happened.

And the graphics, oh man the graphics. If your PC can handle it set, graphics on high, set viewing distance as far as you can, go to Tarantia (one of the three capital cities), get on high ground and look at the view. It's fucking epic. I love WOW and LOTRO but this game is in a whole different league.

Now the negatives. I've been hearing that the more you approach the end-game the game loses its polish. But as a casual player that's taking his time leveling up I'm confident these things will be addressed by the time I'm that high. Such is the nature of MMOs. They're in a permanent development stage.

PS: Boobies.
post #71 of 374
Sounds great. I'll probably be picking this up next week as a birthday present to myself. I was into LOTRO for a while but it just didn't sustain my interest.
post #72 of 374
So we finally get an adult MMO? I might check this one out too.
post #73 of 374
What percentage of PC gaming time is spent on MMORPGs, pirated games, solitaire, and on-line poker?

95%? 99%?
post #74 of 374
Thread Starter 
Quote:
Originally Posted by Overlord View Post
What percentage of PC gaming time is spent on MMORPGs, pirated games, solitaire, and on-line poker?

95%? 99%?
Oh, it's that old horse again. "PC gaming is only MMORPGs and casual games." But that's expected if you only focus on a single segment (retail sans Walmart) of a single market (US) and discount everything else. Latest example is Crysis. Those early NPD numbers were all the rage this winter. "OMG Crysis only sold 80k copies PC gaming is d0med!" Everyone had something to say about that. When a little later the numbers came from EA that Crysis had sold well over a million copies worldwide and was still going strong everybody chose to ignore it. And we're talking about a game that you practically had to build a new PC in order to enjoy it. I know I did.

I'm not claiming some conspiracy to attack PC gaming because there is none. I'm ranting because I've been following the gaming press closely for years either through magazines, sites or podcasts and I've gotten tired of the same song and dance playing whenever there are new consoles out. The Playstation couldn't kill PC gaming, the PS2 couldn't, so certainly neither the XBOX360 nor the PS3 will. And by the time the next generation of consoles comes out and turn out to be just SONY or MS branded gaming PCs with some proprietary stuff thrown in, this nonsense will thankfully end.

Rant over. Sorry, it won't happen again.
post #75 of 374
Quote:
Originally Posted by Overlord View Post
What percentage of PC gaming time is spent on MMORPGs, pirated games, solitaire, and on-line poker?

95%? 99%?
Let's see, in the last year i've played : COD4, Assassins Creed, Gears of Wars, Crysis, Rainbow Six Vegas 1 & 2, orange Box, Timeshift, Kane & Linch, Lost Planet, C&C 3, Suppreme Commander, Guitar Hero III, Turok, and many more i can't remember.

so.. No. I can't stand MMORPG's
post #76 of 374
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tati
Let's see, in the last year i've played : COD4, Assassins Creed, Gears of Wars, Crysis, Rainbow Six Vegas 1 & 2, orange Box, Timeshift, Kane & Linch, Lost Planet, C&C 3, Suppreme Commander, Guitar Hero III, Turok, and many more i can't remember.
But isn't it true that if you lived somewhere where the console versions of this crap weren't ridiculously overpriced you'd probably just get them that way? Are you so drawn to playing while sitting at a desk that you refuse to play the same games with a controller, a TV, and on a couch?

I just bought a new PC that's actually capable of playing decent PC games again and just find that I have no desire to sit in my office and play them. I'd much rather game on the couch in the living room.
post #77 of 374
I like both PC and console gaming. Why chose I say?

When Bioshock launched, my 360 decided to red-ring, so I picked it up for my PC. Amazing game, and absolutely gorgeous with dx10.

(Rather than repair my 360, I was sent a new one. No problems so far. Mainly GTA IV these days.)

I play Civ IV quite a bit too. The most recent expansion was excellent. They expanded the role espionage plays. Nothing better than sending saboteurs into an "ally's" territory to soften them up before I turn on them.

I've played CoH and WoW for a while, and I'm playing Age of Conan now. Believe the hype. It has its shares of hiccups and bugs (new MMO after all) but the pros far outweigh the cons. It's a beautiful world, and the combat is great fun. I'm a Bear Shaman (melee priest.)
post #78 of 374
Thread Starter 
Quote:
Originally Posted by dontEATnachos View Post
But isn't it true that if you lived somewhere where the console versions of this crap weren't ridiculously overpriced you'd probably just get them that way? Are you so drawn to playing while sitting at a desk that you refuse to play the same games with a controller, a TV, and on a couch?

I just bought a new PC that's actually capable of playing decent PC games again and just find that I have no desire to sit in my office and play them. I'd much rather game on the couch in the living room.
I can't speak for Tati but FPS games on consoles blow goats. Mainly because of the controller. No matter how many times I've tried they always seem needlessly awkward. Like trying to play paintball shoulder-deep in water.
post #79 of 374
Quote:
Originally Posted by stelios
FPS games on consoles blow goats. Mainly because of the controller.
I can understand why you say that, I used to feel the same way. I was a die-hard PC gamer (I remember buying the original 3DFX cards when they first came out) but after a while you get used to it and it actually becomes more fun than sitting at a computer and playing it.

Once I made myself play with a controller for awhile, this was after I got out of college and there were a couple of years where I had no cash and a mac laptop so a console was the only way I could keep gaming, it started becoming second nature. I actually feel a like I am worse with mouse and keyboard now when I go back to trying to play on a PC, it's kind of funny.
post #80 of 374
What Stelios said.

I'd love to play arcade or racing games on Xbox.
But Anything that requires me to aim, i'm going with PC every time.

Sure, the multiplayer options of Xbox Live are awesome (and the only reason i would consider getting one), but Nothing will ever replace the mouse for me.

But yes, you are correct in thinking that if the cost of the system and games wasnt 4 times what's in the states, i would buy an Xbox.
post #81 of 374
Quote:
Originally Posted by stelios View Post
And by the time the next generation of consoles comes out and turn out to be just SONY or MS branded gaming PCs with some proprietary stuff thrown in, this nonsense will thankfully end.

Rant over. Sorry, it won't happen again.
We're a half step away from that now.
post #82 of 374
Thread Starter 
Quote:
Originally Posted by dontEATnachos View Post
I can understand why you say that, I used to feel the same way. I was a die-hard PC gamer (I remember buying the original 3DFX cards when they first came out) but after a while you get used to it and it actually becomes more fun than sitting at a computer and playing it.

Once I made myself play with a controller for awhile, this was after I got out of college and there were a couple of years where I had no cash and a mac laptop so a console was the only way I could keep gaming, it started becoming second nature. I actually feel a like I am worse with mouse and keyboard now when I go back to trying to play on a PC, it's kind of funny.
I'm not trying to be adversarial but I don't see why I should make myself like something that doesn't feel right. All the huge targeting reticles, sticky targeting and behind the scenes auto-aiming that console FPSs use in order to be fun make them feel forced to me, like they don't belong being played with this interface.
post #83 of 374
Quote:
Originally Posted by stelios
I'm not trying to be adversarial but I don't see why I should make myself like something that doesn't feel right. All the huge targeting reticles, sticky targeting and behind the scenes auto-aiming that console FPSs use in order to be fun make them feel forced to me, like they don't belong being played with this interface.
I completely agree that the mechanic feels a little bit 'forced' at first. But the question is, how much time have you spent learning the mouse and keyboard mechanic as well? Obviously you're not going to start over and be at the same level you are with a different input method so there has to be something that makes you switch over and learn a new system.

For me, it was the inability to keep up with the demands that having a gaming PC required plus wanting to sit around in my apartment and have friends come over and shoot each other in the face in multiplayer. Those issues finally forced me to give up mouse and keyboard gaming.

And while you may have not gotten to that point yet, at some point you might, and once you've gotten away from the mouse and keyboard as a control scheme, you'll probably find that you don't miss it and it's fun to not be stuck sitting in an office chair at a desk when you want to have fun playing games.

I find it interesting though that the biggest PC gaming proponents aren't usually in countries where consoles have reasonable prices and good release dates on games. That says to me that the reason people stick to PC gaming for now is that it's still for most purposes EASIER than consoles to get a good gaming experience, a fact that is counter how it's been in the US, Japan, and the UK for probably the last 10 years.
post #84 of 374
Thread Starter 
Quote:
Originally Posted by dontEATnachos View Post
I find it interesting though that the biggest PC gaming proponents aren't usually in countries where consoles have reasonable prices and good release dates on games. That says to me that the reason people stick to PC gaming for now is that it's still for most purposes EASIER than consoles to get a good gaming experience, a fact that is counter how it's been in the US, Japan, and the UK for probably the last 10 years.
You're wrong at that. Consoles and their games follow the exact retarded 1:1 conversion rate that PC games use, at least here in Greece. For example a 49.99$ PC game in the US costs 49.99€ here. Likewise a 59.99$ 360 game costs 59.99€ here. We're getting fucked both ways. Price is not a factor.
post #85 of 374
I was under the impression, that like when I was in college or China, most everyone who played PC games just pirated the crap out of them.
post #86 of 374
I do.
But only because we are getting thumbfucked with prices.

An Original PC game in argentina runs over $100. And that's if the distribution company makes it locally. Imported games run close to $200.

I've said it before. Rock Band costs $500 here. Fuck That Shit.
post #87 of 374
Even when a console game supports it, I never use the vastly superior mouse-keyboard combination.

If i'm feeling hardcore, and precision is key - sure. But I don't play games like that anymore.

Also, I like not having to upgrade my console.
post #88 of 374
I love both console and pc gaming, and I don't have any problems with FPSs on a console. Yeah, I prefer a mouse and keyboard, but I also like the big screen and 5.1 DD I get in my living room. Up until this past Christmas I was using the 360 almost exclusively, simply because my pc wasn't up to snuff. But now with my new rig I'm back into pc gaming big-time. I'm loving Oblivion again especially, with all the official AND fan-made pc mods available for it.

Of course, now that I have a good gaming pc again, I have to decide which titles to purchase for which platform.
post #89 of 374
Since I am primarily a Strategy game player, a PC is the only way to go for me.
But I am intrigued that the next installment in the Sid Meier Civilization series will be a console game. I have faith in Sid Meier, but still have trouble seeing how you can play a complex strategy game with a console controller.
post #90 of 374
S.T.A.L.K.E.R. is very cool. Some of the best atmosphere I've ever experienced in a game. It's definitely got problems, but the good far outweighs the bad.

And Grim Fandango, even though it's old. One of the best games ever made.
post #91 of 374
I don't really understand the 'wouldn't you rather be on a couch, playing on a big TV' arguments. Right now my PC is hooked up to a 37" 1080p HDTV, and I sit comfortably in one of those floor level rocking chairs with a wireless mouse and keyboard. And let me say, Crysis running at max detail at 37 inches is a fucking gorgeous thing to behold.

That everybody treats their PC as something that has to sit on a desk in their home office/den hooked up to a 19" monitor instead of in their living room hooked up to a TV isn't an issue inherent in the PC as a platform, it's just their perception of it that's flawed.
post #92 of 374
The average guy has his tv in his living room, with the lazy boy. Instead of living on the PC and paying thousands for graphics cards and ram to run Crisis, the glorious tech demo.
post #93 of 374
Quote:
Originally Posted by Fafhrd
That everybody treats their PC as something that has to sit on a desk in their home office/den hooked up to a 19" monitor instead of in their living room hooked up to a TV isn't an issue inherent in the PC as a platform, it's just their perception of it that's flawed.
It actually is. Most people who have a PC that's actually decent enough to game on generally actually need to use it for things like, oh web browsing, email, spreadsheets, and all kinds of other stuff.

Once you've put your computer on the TV, no matter how big and wonderful that TV is, it loses a certain amount of its functionality. In a practical sense, it's rare that most people have the budget to invest in a PC that they ONLY use for gaming.

You may be willing to spend an extra $500-600 on a PC because you know you'll use it for that but I don't think it really makes sense that you'd be able to get a good gaming PC for less than triple or quadruple what a 360 or PS3 costs.

Keep in mind you'd still need to invest in a decent wireless mouse and keyboard and some kind of crazy surface to rest them on. Because trust me, I know from Typing of the Dead on my Dreamcast that sitting on the couch and using a keyboard for hours it'll carpal tunnel the crap out of you.

For me, the only thing that PC gaming really offers is: a place for indy and smaller developers to make games without having to pay the licensing fees for dev kits that console developers, a place where you can get a good fan community for modding games to extend the life of a game for free beyond the basic cost of the game, and a more complex input method thanks to the availability of 106 key keyboards or whatever.

It's also true that some of my current desire to move away from PC gaming comes from the fact that I'm already sitting at my desk using my computer for at least 9 hours a day for work. Even if I'm going to sit and play videogames for another hour or two I'd certainly rather do it in another room than where I spent the day working.

But if you prefer it more than a console, more power to you, I'm just saying that from my experience that once you switch it's great to be rid of the headaches.
post #94 of 374
Thread Starter 
Quote:
Originally Posted by Domingo View Post
The average guy has his tv in his living room, with the lazy boy. Instead of living on the PC and paying thousands for graphics cards and ram to run Crisis, the glorious tech demo.
You're so wrong about Crysis it's not even funny. Can you point out a console FPS that's better?

And what's the deal with the cost? If you're not depending on your allowance to pay for your gaming, is spending 400 or 500$ every couple of years in order for your PC to play the latest games well that huge a cost? Because that amount is much more realistic than the thousands I hear being thrown about. Admittedly gaming on PCs requires more effort than on consoles but there's not this huge difference everyone thinks.
post #95 of 374
Guys, would you horribly mind if the PC gaming thread didn't degenerate into a loong discussion about how PC gaming sucks? Let us enjoy our platform of choice, proselytizing is not welcome. You have the rest of the forum to yourselves mostly, give it a rest

My PC is still my platform of choice, even though I have a 360, PS3, Wii, DS, and PSP. I prefer western style RPGs like the Witcher and Mask of the Betrayer, and strategy games like Galactic Civilizations 2 and Supreme Commander to the mostly action fare I find on consoles. I also like to try out new MMOs, though I typically lose interest in them due to their community. Age of Conan has my interest at the moment, mostly due to the strength of their content, making the game less reliable on the people in it. So far I made level 15 (on a friend's account though, will have to restart when my copy arrives) and I'm mostly focussing on the Destiny quests, meaning that I'm playing it basically as a single player, western RPG. The grouping and other social functions are reportedly quite bad in the launch UI, and the team is working on fixing them. Any of you have any experiences with that?
post #96 of 374
Thread Starter 
I'm level 23 now so I'm not that far ahead but it certainly becomes much more like previous MMORPGs when it comes to the quests. Kill x of this, gather y of that. The great thing though is that, for now at least, drop rates are completely logical.If you have a quest to gather, say, 10 wolf heads you only have to kill 10 wolves and take their heads. Another example is a quest I completed yesterday. I had to gather a ridiculous amount of lynx's fangs. 40+ I think. In WOW to gather that much of something you'd have to grind for hours. In AOC I did it in 20 minutes. Every lynx dropped two fangs as is logical and once I found a good spot I had a steady supply of them to fight.

So far I'm pretty impressed by it.
post #97 of 374
Quote:
Originally Posted by stelios View Post
You're so wrong about Crysis it's not even funny. Can you point out a console FPS that's better?
I kinda have to disagree here. I thought Crysis really was just pretty graphics and a fairly solid engine - but nothing else.

It was literally an upgrade of the original for me, which may be fine for some. I'm waiting on Farcry 2 to see which turns out to be the better of the two.

I can't name any better FPS on the consoles because there's so few that are exclusive to the format anymore, but i'll happily pick the original Halo as something that gave me more fun than Crysis (even the PC version)
post #98 of 374
Quote:
Originally Posted by mediumdave View Post
S.T.A.L.K.E.R. is very cool. Some of the best atmosphere I've ever experienced in a game. It's definitely got problems, but the good far outweighs the bad.

And Grim Fandango, even though it's old. One of the best games ever made.
Yes, yes YES. One of the greatest adventure games ever.
post #99 of 374
Thread Starter 
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bees?! View Post
I kinda have to disagree here. I thought Crysis really was just pretty graphics and a fairly solid engine - but nothing else.

It was literally an upgrade of the original for me, which may be fine for some. I'm waiting on Farcry 2 to see which turns out to be the better of the two.

I can't name any better FPS on the consoles because there's so few that are exclusive to the format anymore, but i'll happily pick the original Halo as something that gave me more fun than Crysis (even the PC version)
I'd give you Halo if not for the retarded and game ruining inclusion of the Flood. I was having a lot of fun until they showed up.
post #100 of 374
Never found the flood to be a problem. Just a new enemy to mow down.

Still, there's your console game.

Back to PC.
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:
  Return Home
  Back to Forum: Video Games
CHUD.com Community › Forums › VIDEO GAMES & RPG › Video Games › The Semi-Official PC Gaming Thread