Quote:
Originally Posted by Matthew T 
|
I've read the Kevin Walker script. Seeing as there's been the Self rewrite, I don't know how valid any of the following is but...
THE BAD
Bad finale. Not so much to do with the action, but the dialogue is the same forced drivel that villains seem to slip into come finale time (Iron Man had this problem too).
Bad closing scene with the gypsies.
THE GOOD
Violence. It is fitting in this story.
Not every horror story need be R, and when horror directors proclaim in interviews 'It's sooo gonna be a hard R!' I always get the feeling they're focusing their attention in the wrong area. Anyway, The Wolfman, needs some blood and violence, it's just that kind of film. And if that's changed, then that's a real bummer. It's not a pleasant situation to be turned into a wolf and will be an even worse situation to find yourself as an audience member watching as the camera cuts away for yet another off-screen kill.
Really can't think of anything else good about the script. I didn't like it. I do however like del Toro, so it has that.
Last thing however...
You say a CGI transformation is a bad thing. I don't. Of course Rick Baker is gonna be pissed off at that, he's a make up guy. And there are a few notable bad CGI transformations (Underworld, Van Helsing, pretty much anything in LXG) HOWEVER! The only reason why Transformers looked so goo is because people have spent the last 20 years developing the art to a point where special effects are beginning to become less 'special.' By this I mean they're not as noticeable, blend better with the rest of the mise en scene and we spend less time these days going 'Oh that looks so fake.' So I'd say, let em do a CGI transformation in combination with make up. There's been five years worth of progression since Van Helsing. And if they don't get it right this time, they'll be better eqiupped for the next film.
To condense all that, a shot of Davy Jones from POTC is all you need to argue against 'make up is soooo much better than CGI.'