Quote:
Originally Posted by Waaaaaaaalt 
Whoa Jack who slapped you in the face with a white glove? In your post you pretty much repeated exactly what I said didn't you? I said in my post that with a guy like Divoff toture probably wouldn't work but it would work on a puss like me. Thus the idea of "torture never works" isn't exactly true. If you don't believe in torture for moral reasons thats perfectly fine, it makes me uncomfortable too. Mostly because it's hard to be 100% sure that the person actually knows the info you want and you might be harming an innocent person.
|
I don't think you quite get what I'm saying. I'm saying a person who is weak and will crack under physical torture to reveal credible information is someone you do not need to torture. They will crack sans phsyical violence. A person like Ivan wouldn't break through violence. Even if he did eventually provide information it could not be considered reliable, and you would have possibly thrown away any chance of getting credible information out of him. So, I don't think Weston was wasting his time, or choosing a more leisurely path to that information. Even if he was in a Jack Bauer time crunch he was still choosing the correct tact in securing the information, in a real world way this show attempts to stick to.
Quote:
| All I was saying was that in a case where you knew for sure and there was a limted amount of time, perhaps even more limited than what was given in the episode, there might not be time to trick him and you might have to resort to it. Would the info be 100% accurate? Maybe not but it's better than nothing and you could always check on the info without going on guns blazing right? But what I really thought was funny was that it wasn't that Weston was morally against it, he just didn't trust it, which to me is a a stange character quirk. |
No, unreliable information is not better than no information. And I guess were lucky in your scenario that you'd have enough time in a situation that demanded torture be used (which you seem to see as a last resort), but would still be able to verify the information before moving in on the time sensitive event (which I assume you don't think takes that long).
Quote:
| Look in the part of my post that you of course didn't copy and paste I stated that I really liked the con and the episode and the fact the Divoff got killed and probably totured anyway by his own people and thats still true now. So why don't you relax? |
I assume you're reacting to me calling you a pussy, I'm using your term. You refer to yourself as a pussy. I'm not trying to be personal, I'm just using the term you used to describe your character type. Looking back though I suppose you just called yourself a puss. So replace pussy with puss. Wasn't trying to insult you.
I don't know why you think I accused you of not liking the episode or that you didn't really like Ivan getting probably tortured.