CHUD.com Community › Forums › POLITICS & RELIGION › Political Discourse › Court Rewards Exxon for Valdez Oil Spill
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:

Court Rewards Exxon for Valdez Oil Spill

post #1 of 9
Thread Starter 
Quote:
by Greg Palast

Chicago Tribune (revised from 2003 article)

June 25, 2008

Twenty years after Exxon Valdez slimed over one thousand miles of Alaskan beaches, the oily company has yet to pay the $5 billion in punitive damages awarded by the jury. And now they won't have to. The Supreme Court today cut Exxon's liability by 90% to half a billion. It's so cheap, it's like a permit to spill.

Exxon knew this would happen. Right after the spill, I was brought in by Natives of Alaska to investigate oil company frauds that led to to the disaster. In San Diego, I met with Exxon's US production chief,

Otto Harrison, whose company offered the Alaskan Natives pennies on the dollar. The oil men added a cruel threat: take it or leave it and wait twenty years to get even the pennies. Exxon is immortal - but Natives die.

And they did. A third of the Native fishermen and seal hunters I worked with are dead. Now their families will collect ten cents on the dollar of their award, two decades too late.

Between 1989 and 2008, the company worked hard to buy themselves a White House and the Supreme Court to go with it. They succeeded - beyond our wildest nightmares.

Now read the story you won't get on the Petroleum Broadcasting System.

Don't Buy Exxon's Fable Of The Drunken Captain

Thirty years ago this month, Alaskan natives sold Exxon and its partners an astronomically valuable patch of land -- the oil terminal at Valdez -- for a single dollar.

The Chugach Natives of the Prince William Sound refused cash. Rather, in 1969, they asked only that the oil companies promise to protect their fishing and seal hunting grounds from oil.

In 1971, Exxon and partners agreed to place the Natives' specific list of safeguards into federal law. These commitment to safety reassured enough Congressmen for the oil group to win, by one vote, the right to ship oil from Valdez.

On Wednesday, March 24, the Tenth Anniversary of the Exxon Valdez disaster was commemorated with the re-telling of lies. The official story is, "Drunken Skipper Hits Reef." Don't believe it.

This story remains untold: the true cause of the Exxon Valdez catastrophe was the oil giants' breaking their promises to the Natives and Congress, cynically and disastrously, in the fifteen years leading up to the spill. As to Captain Joe Hazelwood, he was below decks, sleeping off his bender. At the helm, the third mate would never have collided with Bligh Reef had he looked at his Raycas radar. But the radar was not turned on. In fact, the tanker's radar was left broken and disasbled for more than a year before the disaster, and Exxon management knew it. It was just too expensive to fix and operate.
The rest is here.

Speechless.
post #2 of 9
I am really, really sick of this.

As in, I am actually feeling sick to my stomach.
post #3 of 9
...
Mother of god. The truth, it appears, is far stranger and way more fucking depressing than fiction.
post #4 of 9
Genuinely nauseating. I wish the article would explain exactly what the Constitutional issue was at hand that got the Supreme Court's attention and penalty reduction, I don't have the time to search it up. Not really sure I want to know, though.
post #5 of 9
Back in 1990, my family and I took a fishing trip up to Alaska. I remember talking with a bunch of the people who lived up there and who worked in the fishing industry. All of them said that Exxon was blaming Hazelwood and dodging any financial responsibility in the matter. I'm not surprised by this turn of events at all.

By the way, go to Alaska if you can. It is BAR NONE the most beautiful place that I've ever been on earth.
post #6 of 9
"Exxon Discussion Board: Court Draws Clear Lines for Punitive Damages"
http://www.scotusblog.com/wp/exxon-d...itive-damages/

A few more interesting blog posts on this decision on the main page of that blog, still catching up to them.

"Analysis: A new day on punitive damages law"
http://www.scotusblog.com/wp/analysi...law/#more-7548

"An Initial Thought on Exxon and Kennedy"
http://www.scotusblog.com/wp/an-init...n-and-kennedy/
post #7 of 9
Thread Starter 
Quote:
In a victory for corporations seeking to limit big-dollar lawsuits, the court decided 5-3 to reduce the $2.5 billion punitive damages. The award was excessive, the justices wrote, and reduced it to $507.5 million. The original multibillion-dollar punitive damages had been awarded as punishment for the company's role in spilling 11 million gallons of oil into the pristine fishing waters of Alaska's Prince William Sound.

"The punitive damages award against Exxon was excessive as a matter of maritime common law," Justice David Souter wrote in the majority opinion. "In the circumstances of this case, the award should be limited to an amount equal to compensatory damages."

The 32,677 plaintiffs in the case have been waiting for their compensation since 1994, when a jury in Anchorage, Alaska, returned a $5 billion punitive-damages award against Exxon Mobil. The company has been appealing the verdict since then. In 2006, the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals cut the award to $2.5 billion. Exxon appealed that decision to the Supreme Court, which heard oral arguments in the case Feb. 27.

Business groups such as the American Petroleum Institute and the U.S. Chamber of Commerce had hoped that the Supreme Court would use the case as a way to curb large punitive damages against corporations.

Former Alaska governors, the current governor, the state's congressional delegation, supertanker captains, environmentalists, state lawmakers, Alaska Natives and experts in maritime law joined with the plaintiffs in asking that the Supreme Court uphold the $2.5 billion verdict.
Emphases are mine. The story is here.
post #8 of 9
This makes me livid. I really don't even know what to say about stuff like this.
post #9 of 9


Gentlemen, to evil.
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:
  Return Home
  Back to Forum: Political Discourse
CHUD.com Community › Forums › POLITICS & RELIGION › Political Discourse › Court Rewards Exxon for Valdez Oil Spill