Quote:
Originally Posted by
Joshua Miller 
Finally saw THE CHILDREN. I'd rank it on par with TRIANGLE. Very, very well done movie. It didn't quite speak to me inside, but it definitely has some great moments. Now that CHUD's done a list about killing old people and pets, if we ever do a Best Children Deaths list, I'm already nominating the kid who gets his neck jammed onto the broken part of a door.
Yeah, it wasn't that long ago I saw The Children and I happened to enjoy it quite a bit. I agree it was very well done.
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Gabe T 
So today I saw...
I'm sure some around here will consider this blasphemy but Troma isn't really for me in general. Too much juvenile and puerile stuff for me. However, given some of the stuff you guys have said, it almost puts me over the edge in wanting to give it a viewing. Then, I notice that hot brunette in the poster, and that's also an inventive to check it out.
Although, I saw a red band trailer for the movie, and WOW at just some of the things I saw in there. Although, I really enjoyed Hobo With A Shotgun and it seems to be in the same vein.
By the way, if you look on the movie's IMDb page, you'll see some tremendous hand-drawn posters.
Quote:
Originally Posted by
fuzzy dunlop 
Relic was one of my absolute favorite books when I was a kid. I think I picked it up in middle school and was hooked on Preston & Child from there out. I still dig their stuff, even though its essentially Crichton-lite.
So of course the movie was immensely disappointing to me when I first saw it, for the usual reasons - cool subplots ignored, awesome characters dropped, etc. But I'm willing to give it another go since its been years, and my love of cheesy monster movies has only grown in that time span.
There's a movie I saw on the big screen and then never watched it again (more on that trend later), although I saw it with someone older as I was too young to go to it on my own. From what I remember it was a poor version of the book. Maybe if I watch it today I would like it more.
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Arjen Rudd 
It's strange, considering books by Preston/Child, or Steve Alten, or even Clive Cussler seem like they were written specifically to be films, they're so cinematic. Yet we've gotten only Relic and Sahara.
Way back in the 90's I read the paperback version of Meg and on it, the promise of "Soon to be a major motion picture!" and we saw what happened there. I barely remember the book but I'm sure I enjoyed it. And I do know there were Meg sequels but I haven't read any of them.
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Arjen Rudd 
I also really liked the lead actress, Sarah Paxton, and I expect she's going places. I liked her enough to maybe even give Shark Night a chance - anyone else bite that bullet yet?
Oh, I haven't heard too much good about that. While the thing that allows the plot to happen is so ridiculous it's almost genius, it otherwise is a big disappointment from what I understand. Although, an African-American somehow acquires a SPEAR, and I mean something that looks to be out of Africa. YIKES at that, which I heard about on a podcast.
Last week Rene of this site mentioned on his Facebook page that he watched the Psycho remake. It got me to thinking and sad to say, that movie was likely the first R-rated film I saw on the big screen on my own! Back then I rarely went to the cineplex, but I still screwed up there. It wasn't until just a few days ago that I saw it for a second time, and I have to agree with the general consensus there. It was more of a giant waste of time rather than something that's unwatchable. Someone trying to imitate a famous movie from a famous director while trying to add some "modern" things is just asking for trouble, and when the main lead casting was wrong too, then it's destined for failure. At least I doubt I'll ever watch it again.