PLANET OF THE APES - 1968
BENEATH THE PLANET OF THE APES - 1970
ESCAPE FROM THE PLANET OF THE APES - 1971
CONQUEST OF THE PLANET OF THE APES - 1972
BATTLE FOR THE PLANET OF THE APES - 1973
Looking back, it's quite astonishing to see that there actually were 5 PotA flicks in the course of just 6 years. I think they aged quite well, with ideas that still work and some good performances by Heston and McDowell.
The first one is quite good at being a neat sci-fi action movie. Linda Harrison looks like Megan Fox and Zaius happens to be a great cinematic asshole. The ending makes it even better. The masks are a bit stiff (at least this was done extremely well in the remake), but they still work. What I don't get - whether it's the remake or the original - why does the hero run around all day with a hotass by his side, only to kiss the ape girl later on. That leaves a bad taste.
Now Beneath doesn't work that good. First of all, that Heston copy is nowhere as good as the man himself. The new guys underground, I think they just sucked in concept and execution. The ending is good, though.
Escape is clearly the least spectacular, but with bringing the Apes in present day world it works quite well. Plus you get drunk Apes and Apes in suits... and KHANN!!! (if only for a bunch of minutes)
Conquest as a Rise of the Apes is interesting to look at (McDowell is especially good in this.. and we get more KHAN), but it's a bit retarded in not explaining how chimpanzees evolved into those man-chimps.
Battle is the worst one. Easily. I mean the general does his best to channel Cox as Stryker in X-Men 2, but the onscreen battle is one of the worst ever put to film. It's clumsy, horribly edited and just slow as fuck. No feel for danger, and that strategic maneuver is just dumb.
BENEATH THE PLANET OF THE APES - 1970
ESCAPE FROM THE PLANET OF THE APES - 1971
CONQUEST OF THE PLANET OF THE APES - 1972
BATTLE FOR THE PLANET OF THE APES - 1973
Looking back, it's quite astonishing to see that there actually were 5 PotA flicks in the course of just 6 years. I think they aged quite well, with ideas that still work and some good performances by Heston and McDowell.
The first one is quite good at being a neat sci-fi action movie. Linda Harrison looks like Megan Fox and Zaius happens to be a great cinematic asshole. The ending makes it even better. The masks are a bit stiff (at least this was done extremely well in the remake), but they still work. What I don't get - whether it's the remake or the original - why does the hero run around all day with a hotass by his side, only to kiss the ape girl later on. That leaves a bad taste.
Now Beneath doesn't work that good. First of all, that Heston copy is nowhere as good as the man himself. The new guys underground, I think they just sucked in concept and execution. The ending is good, though.
Escape is clearly the least spectacular, but with bringing the Apes in present day world it works quite well. Plus you get drunk Apes and Apes in suits... and KHANN!!! (if only for a bunch of minutes)
Conquest as a Rise of the Apes is interesting to look at (McDowell is especially good in this.. and we get more KHAN), but it's a bit retarded in not explaining how chimpanzees evolved into those man-chimps.
Battle is the worst one. Easily. I mean the general does his best to channel Cox as Stryker in X-Men 2, but the onscreen battle is one of the worst ever put to film. It's clumsy, horribly edited and just slow as fuck. No feel for danger, and that strategic maneuver is just dumb.



