Does a happy dance.
post #251 of 287
1/15/09 at 11:17am
Be a part of the community.
It's free, join today!
| You guys have opened up the time element of the show in this really interesting way, but how do you stop it from becoming a giant story problem? You know, “If a train left Pittsburgh going 50 miles an hour, and another train left Dallas going 25 miles an hour...” How do you make that time element clean and clear for people who might have trouble with it? Lindelof: Carlton and I spent five weeks last year just breaking “The Constant,” with the entire writing staff. The reason it was so tricky was all these things you’re talking about, in terms of, “If Faraday told Desmond in 1996 to tell Penny to call him in 2004, wouldn’t she say to him ...” And then eventually, you get to a point of saying, “Are we breaking any rules, according to the rules we set, is it emotionally viable, and is it confusing?” So when we were sitting down to talk about Season 5, we were like, “We’re essentially breaking ‘The Constant’ every single week now.” I think since we’ve gone through the process the first time, we learned valuable lessons. It is very challenging to do clean time-travel stories where you can’t change the future, but also rewarding when we accomplish it. |
|
Because I'm such a huge fan of this show, I'm not going to nitpick the time travel plot holes. But I am fully aware there are going to be (and have been) plot holes. As Cuse and Lindelof stated above, according to the rules of the show the future can't be changed. But As DaveB pointed out again in previous threads, particularly in regards to Desmond saving Charlie from dying over and over, they have changed the future. It'll be interesting to see how they address this during the season.
|
|
Yeah, I see it the same way as Doc. They changed the How, but not the What.
How Charlie dies was manipulated. That Charlie dies could not be manipulated. |
|
Well, we saw on air Desmond get told by the old lady that he can't change the future. And we saw plenty of evidence in Desmond's time travels that even when he wanted to, he couldn't (not just with Charlie, but also with Penny). Not to mention the numerous interviews with Cuse and Lidelof saying that they aren't going to retcon everything that's happened by saying the Losties can just change what happened. That takes all the dramatic tension out of the show.
|
| Had I warned him about the scaffolding, tomorrow he'd be hit by a taxi. Had I warned him about the taxi, he'd fall in the shower and break his neck. The universe, unfortunately, has a way of course-correcting. That man was supposed to die; that was his path. Just as it's your path to go to the island. You don't do it because you choose to, Desmond. You do it because you're supposed to. |
|
But it was. Of course Charlie's going to die; even if they were rescued and he lived a long, quiet life he'd have eventually got old. At the moment, there is no reason why it would be possible to change the future on a small scale but not a large one, or any indication of what constitutes large or small. Leading the freighter that never would have found it to the island seems like a pretty big deal to me.
|
|
To explain: The way I see it, when you meddle with the flow of things as Desmond did in season 3, the details change but the larger picture remains the same. Had Desmond not kept Charlie alive, someone else would have made that call, or the freighter would have found another way to the Island. The pieces are rearranged, but the future-picture remains the same.
|
|
This is my general line of reasoning when I discuss the Terminator franchise with people. But for some reason, I don't think the Lost and the Terminator time travel rules are the same (though I have no real reason for that assumption).
|
|
You could say that if the freighter wasn't supposed to get to the island, then maybe THAT is yet another event the universe has to course-correct for. You could go on and on with this forever if you wanted, which is part of the fun, and I think, part of what they intend the viewer to do.
|
|
Originally Posted by Jan
And then eventually, you get to a point of saying, “Are we breaking any rules, according to the rules we set, is it emotionally viable, and is it confusing?” So when we were sitting down to talk about Season 5, we were like, “We’re essentially breaking ‘The Constant’ every single week now.”
I think since we’ve gone through the process the first time, we learned valuable lessons. |
|
I don't think they've "admitted that there's plot-holes."
<snip> What are you considering these "plot holes?" |
|
In reference to the time travel stuff thusfar, specifically from The Constant, how did you all take the note Daniel read from himself at the end? Did the note about "Desmond will be MY constant" just "appear" after Desmond went "back" and met up with him? Or was it there all the time, and the fact that the note was there guided him to tell Desmond to meet up with him at Oxford? Or, did Daniel remember meeting him (I certainly don't think this happened) and thus, directed him to go back and do what needed to be done?
|
|
In reference to the time travel stuff thusfar, specifically from The Constant, how did you all take the note Daniel read from himself at the end? Did the note about "Desmond will be MY constant" just "appear" after Desmond went "back" and met up with him? Or was it there all the time, and the fact that the note was there guided him to tell Desmond to meet up with him at Oxford? Or, did Daniel remember meeting him (I certainly don't think this happened) and thus, directed him to go back and do what needed to be done? |
|
“We’re essentially breaking ‘The Constant’ every single week now.” Seems like an admission to me.
|
|
Originally Posted by Carlton Cuse
Not only did the time-travel stuff have to make some sort of sense and follow its own logic, but there needed to be a really genuine emotional payoff. And it took a long time to get to a place where we felt both goals were accomplished. To echo what Damon said, that really became the template for us in terms of what our goal is this year.
|