CHUD.com Community › Forums › ARTS & LITERATURE › Comics & Anime › Watchmen discussion from 1988
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:

Watchmen discussion from 1988

post #1 of 26
Thread Starter 
A loooong roundtable discussion with Alan Moore, Dave Gibbons, and the editors (?) of Fantasy Advertiser from March 1988, going over the comic, potential Minutemen prequel, and the potential for a film version.

It goes without saying, if you haven't read Watchmen you really shouldn't read this:

http://www.johncoulthart.com/feuilleton/?p=613
post #2 of 26
I like it. Thanks for the link.
post #3 of 26
Thread Starter 
Yeah, I'd never realized the depths to which they tried to make everything geographically accurate...that all the streets, buildings, and alleys shown in Watchmen New York for the most part correspond to the real deal--I thought it was esp. funny that the NYC comic shop Forbidden Planet is replaced in the Watchmen universe by the comic store Treasure Island.

Also liked the idea that there's probably one publisher that does superhero comics, but they don't sell very well...the equivalent of Archie Comics in our universe.

Interesting to note Moore's opinion in '88 that Schwarzenegger could possibly pull off Dr Manhattan (though, as he says later, he suggests a computer effect).
post #4 of 26
Thanks for posting the link, Dax. The more I read about Watchmen, I realize how many layers and nuances I've missed. I found it funny that Moore constantly shot down Whitaker's comments.
post #5 of 26
Thread Starter 
One of the reasons I find that interview/discussion so interesting is because I doubt Moore will ever sit down and participate in such an analysis about Watchmen again. I found some of his brief comments about certain characters illuminating (like "'Anything, just for a quiet life'--that’s Dr Manhattan’s point of view").

And yeah, I've probably read Watchmen about twenty times, but some of those details they mention--like the smiley face on the hydrants, for one--are things I've never ever noticed before.
post #6 of 26
Quote:
SW: I’d really like to know why Osterman lies… well, he doesn’t exactly lie, he withholds the truth about Rorschach from Veidt.
AM: He doesn’t mention it.
SW: Veidt says something like “What about Rorschach?” and Osterman says “I doubt if he’ll reach civilisation”. He doesn’t say “Don’t worry, I’ve just blasted him to atoms”…it comes across as a mercy killing.
Until reading this I never thought that maybe Jon was saving Rorshach from the frenzy that is going to occur when his journal goes public.

The peace will be short lived once the New Frontiersman begins printing the journal, it is clearly identified as "Rorshachs" journal and the public now knows that Walter Kovacs is Rorshach.

Jon can see the future, present and past all at once. Perhaps he knows what is going to happen, leaves Veidt ambiguously "correct", removes Rorshach from the media fate that Jon underwent in the cancer allegations and understands Laurie and Dan will hide no matter what.

I found this thread while looking for a Watchmen GN thread. Do we have one?

This thread seems to address where I am heading with my post.
post #7 of 26
Quote:
Originally Posted by TzuDohNihm View Post
Until reading this I never thought that maybe Jon was saving Rorshach from the frenzy that is going to occur when his journal goes public.

The peace will be short lived once the New Frontiersman begins printing the journal, it is clearly identified as "Rorshachs" journal and the public now knows that Walter Kovacs is Rorshach.

Jon can see the future, present and past all at once. Perhaps he knows what is going to happen, leaves Veidt ambiguously "correct", removes Rorshach from the media fate that Jon underwent in the cancer allegations and understands Laurie and Dan will hide no matter what.

I found this thread while looking for a Watchmen GN thread. Do we have one?
I think that's a wildly incorrect reading. Jon can only see his own future, and he's leaving Earth.

The mercy killing isn't to save Rorschach from the furor of the journal but from the pain of life. He lives in a black and white world, and the enormity of the grey in Adrian's actions is too much for him. It was the black and white world of good and evil that gave him what little comfort he had; without that he is truly 100% broken.
post #8 of 26
Quote:
Originally Posted by devincf View Post
I think that's a wildly incorrect reading. Jon can only see his own future, and he's leaving Earth.

The mercy killing isn't to save Rorschach from the furor of the journal but from the pain of life. He lives in a black and white world, and the enormity of the grey in Adrian's actions is too much for him. It was the black and white world of good and evil that gave him what little comfort he had; without that he is truly 100% broken.
I guess he does have to be involved in the situation to see the events around it. OK.

So in a unified world, Rorshach has little purpose and the pain of that realization drives him to have Jon "do it"?
post #9 of 26
Quote:
Originally Posted by TzuDohNihm View Post
I guess he does have to be involved in the situation to see the events around it. OK.

So in a unified world, Rorshach has little purpose and the pain of that realization drives him to have Jon "do it"?
I don't think it's a unified world so much as a world created by a very "gray" decision made by a man that he knew he had already failed to stop and the pain of knowing that his failure may not have been the worst thing for the world was what lead to his mercy killing.
post #10 of 26
It's similar to what the Comedian went through earlier. He had a strict view of things, and the enormity of Ozy's plan made him rethink that view (give up on it, really)
post #11 of 26
That was an amazing roundtable...thanks for bumping this thread, TzuDohNihm.
post #12 of 26
Thread Starter 
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jared Melton View Post
That was an amazing roundtable...thanks for bumping this thread, TzuDohNihm.
Yeah, I'd forgotten all about it, and I started the thing.
post #13 of 26
My brother complained about the comic being a half-a__ comic that ripped off characters and stories from other comics. I don't know much about comics history but I haven't heard this complaint about the Watchmen before. Is it justifiable?
post #14 of 26
Quote:
Originally Posted by Thunderbird View Post
My brother complained about the comic being a half-a__ comic that ripped off characters and stories from other comics. I don't know much about comics history but I haven't heard this complaint about the Watchmen before. Is it justifiable?
Your brother is a stupid person. I'm so sorry.
post #15 of 26
Quote:
Originally Posted by Thunderbird View Post
My brother complained about the comic being a half-a__ comic that ripped off characters and stories from other comics. I don't know much about comics history but I haven't heard this complaint about the Watchmen before. Is it justifiable?
Only so far in the literal sense that the characters were based on specific characters from Charlton Comics.

Also, if he is your younger brother then explain to him that he is a half assed human being and his entire life is ripped off from yours. Then pistol whip him like Ray Liotta in Goodfellas.
post #16 of 26
So very sorry.
post #17 of 26
Thread Starter 
Yeah, y'know, I can understand how someone could not like the comic, but...thinking of it as 'half-assed' is kinda unfathomable to me. That's the very last thing it is.
post #18 of 26
saying it's half-assed is just a lazy argument.
post #19 of 26
I know that the characters were based on other characters but they are really archetypes of heroes. And if one uses that complaint, then nearly every character in comics is a ripoff. I just can't figure out where he got off saying that it stole scenes from other comic books.
post #20 of 26
Quote:
Originally Posted by Thunderbird View Post
I know that the characters were based on other characters but they are really archetypes of heroes. And if one uses that complaint, then nearly every character in comics is a ripoff. I just can't figure out where he got off saying that it stole scenes from other comic books.
Well, there are a few hints here and there of ideas that would later turn up in Watchmen in the X-Men storyline "Days of Future Past" and the "Squadron Supreme" miniseries, among other comics, but as I say they're no more than half-formed ideas in comparison to what Moore and Gibbons created; absolutely nothing was "stolen" for use in Watchmen.
post #21 of 26
Call me a fucking moron, but this is one (of the many, I'm sure) things that I had never put together in my multiple readings of the book.

Quote:
FJ: Looking back at Ozymandias making this decision “I will kill so many million people to save the world” one thing that struck me is that when Dr Manhattan teleports the people away from the riot and kills 2 of them he says that’s okay because many more people would have died, and Rorschach, in his essay…
AM: About Truman.
FJ: Yes—about Hiroshima—says “I’m glad they dropped bombs on Hiroshima because lots more people would have been killed”.
AM: Yes, more people would have died.
FJ: So although they’re diametrically opposed in one way, they’ve all made this same statement, they’ve all made this same decision… but only Ozymandias has followed it through.
post #22 of 26
It's different though. The Japanese were perceived as literally evil due to the American propaganda machine during WWII. They were the enemies. Adrian killed however many millions of innocent people in order to avert a war that was only theoretical in nature -- meaning it hadn't happened yet, and since it didn't occur there is no guarantee that it ever would have.
post #23 of 26
It's certainly different, and they acknowledge as much further on in the discussion.

But it is a very deliberate move and a very interesting one.
post #24 of 26
Been re-reading a lot of Alan Moore because of the movie, and just got through his six volumes of Swamp Thing. In volume 5, Swamp Thing's body is destroyed, and he's blocked from entering the green, by the machinations of Lex Luthor. ST's consciousness is thus flung across the universe, and ends up on a (seemingly) barren world where he reforms himself out of blue corral.

The entire issue is his inner monologue as he creates a second Swamp Thing for companionship, then an entire town of his old friends. I couldn't help but feel that, seeing as this issue ("My Blue Heaven") was published in 1987, this picked up Dr. Manhattan's story where Watchmen left off. In fact, seeing as Alan Moore's run on ST started about 1-2 years before Watchmen was published, I can't help but think of Swamp Thing as a proto-Dr. Manhattan now.

As well, re-read Moore's Supreme run and am now reading Tom Strong for the first time. The Supreme stuff is All-Star Superman before Grant Morrison. It's provocative how Moore mentioned in an interview that he felt guilty for turning the superhero genre grim & gritty, and has been attempting to bring it back to its silver age roots since the mid-90s or so (aside from the occasional From Hell and League of Extraordinary Gentlemen). I very much enjoy his America's Best Comics stuff, it's a lot of fun.

The old stuff, along with late 80's/early 90's Hellblazer, Books of Magic and Sandman makes me miss the days when Vertigo housed a small corner of the DCU that, although separate, would occasionally bleed over into the main whole. Moore's Swamp Thing has Constantine on the Monitor's space station during the Crisis! I liked outsider characters commenting on the silliness of the genre as a whole. These days Hellblazer is the only old tier Vertigo left, with nary a Zatanna or Phantom Stranger appearance in sight.
post #25 of 26
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bartleby_Scriven View Post
These days Hellblazer is the only old tier Vertigo left, with nary a Zatanna or Phantom Stranger appearance in sight.
My understanding (and I have no "inside" info) is that Vertigo has been working over the past few years to harden the wall between itself and the core DCU, presumably to disassociate their "adult" product from regular old "superheroes", even ones that once helped keep Vertigo on its feet in the early days.
post #26 of 26
Moore's Swamp Thing run is so fucking good. It really deserves its own thread.
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:
  Return Home
  Back to Forum: Comics & Anime
CHUD.com Community › Forums › ARTS & LITERATURE › Comics & Anime › Watchmen discussion from 1988