CHUD.com Community › Forums › POLITICS & RELIGION › Political Discourse › Is Sarah Palin NOT the mother?
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:

Is Sarah Palin NOT the mother? - Page 10

post #451 of 474
9/3/08 at 5:39pm
Quote:
Originally Posted by myk View Post
But it's moot anyways. We don't need to have alternative energy replace oil dependence immediately in the short term, we just need to reduce demand. And that can be done much more quickly.
You know what would change demand way under 10 years? Expensive gas, one of these candidates promises to gradually raise the price of gas via taxes, and gets my automatic vote.

Of course, they would lose the election.
Reply
post #452 of 474
9/3/08 at 5:40pm
Yeah, but you know, ElCap, even before I was politically active, I kept hearing about emission standards and hearing about solar energy, and these plans that wouldn't put them into effect for twenty years. That's what has kept us from the 21st century, bullshit lip service.

But sorry I misunderstood.
Reply
post #453 of 474
9/7/08 at 8:42pm
The baby sage is not over ...

On Drudge ... nothing else on the link for now
NYT PREPARES TO FRONT EXPOSE ON PALIN'S BABY... DEVELOPING...
Reply
post #454 of 474
9/7/08 at 8:46pm
You're not going to make me click that link, are you?
Reply
post #455 of 474
9/7/08 at 8:47pm
It currently only links to drudge and has no story. He has this habit of preparing the link as soon as possible and then linking to a story.
So nothing beyond that ... yet.
Reply
post #456 of 474
9/7/08 at 8:49pm
I was, believe it or not, just thinking about how this was never so much refuted as much as it simply became too radioactive a topic to mention in polite company. I'm intrigued. And the New York Times might get firebombed by Freepers.
Reply
post #457 of 474
9/7/08 at 8:53pm
I have no idea where that link is going, but should be interesting to find out ... I'm thinking it could be a story about Bristol's baby, how the family and the McCain campaign found out ... but that's sort of old news now, no?
Reply
post #458 of 474
9/7/08 at 8:56pm
Or the taboo subject of the timing of Track's birth vs. his parents' wedding date.
Reply
post #459 of 474
9/7/08 at 9:04pm
Doesn't even specify WHICH baby. Or which Palin, for that matter.
Reply
post #460 of 474
9/7/08 at 9:05pm
Maybe one of the babies murdered a sibling we don't know about? We're entering Desperate Housewives territory here ...
Reply
post #461 of 474
9/7/08 at 9:07pm
Shit, with Palin that's where we started.
Reply
post #462 of 474
9/7/08 at 10:30pm
The press needs to learn to leave Mrs. Jesus Christ alone.

They've fucked things up enough.
Reply
post #463 of 474
9/7/08 at 10:52pm
So it went from an "expose" (ooooooooh - scandalous!) to...

NYT: MEET THE BABY...
PAPER PREPARES TO FRONT DETAILED STORY ON PALIN'S BABY, NEWSROOM SOURCES TELL DRUDGE... DEVELOPING...

(ooooh, not particularly useful or interesting... that's more like the NY Times I know)

Fucking Drudge. Bet that little episode will be good for a couple trillion page hits.
Reply
post #464 of 474
9/7/08 at 10:55pm
Yeah, what the heck?!?!
Reply
post #465 of 474
9/7/08 at 11:19pm
Quote:
Originally Posted by ElCapitanAmerica View Post
Maybe one of the babies murdered a sibling we don't know about? We're entering Desperate Housewives territory here ...
Maybe the baby ate its twin while in the womb, like on Venture Brothers. Now THAT would be a scoop.
Reply
post #466 of 474
9/7/08 at 11:23pm
Quote:
Originally Posted by Chavez View Post
Maybe the baby ate its twin while in the womb, like on Venture Brothers. Now THAT would be a scoop.
That would only energize the base! That baby is HARDCORE! The twin was WEAK! USA! USA! USA!
Reply
post #467 of 474
9/8/08 at 12:06am
Quote:
Originally Posted by reggie-wanker View Post
That would only energize the base! That baby is HARDCORE! The twin was WEAK! USA! USA! USA!
Every sperm is sacred, reggie. It would destroy Palin.
Reply
post #468 of 474
9/8/08 at 12:29am
Here's the article;

Fusing Politics and Motherhood in New Way
http://www.nytimes.com/2008/09/08/us...hp&oref=slogin
Reply
post #469 of 474
9/8/08 at 12:43am
Drudge is laughing his ass off.
Reply
post #470 of 474
9/8/08 at 3:55pm
More national reporting regarding Palin's tenure as Alaska's Governor:

Quote:
In response to her request, McLeod received four large boxes of emails. This batch of documents did not contain any proof that Frye and Bailey had worked on government time to boot out Ruedrich. But there was other information she found troubling. Several of the emails suggested to her that Palin's office had used its influence to reward a Fairbanks surveyor who was a Palin fundraiser with a state job. In early August, McLeod filed a complaint with the state attorney general against Palin, Bailey, and other Palin aides, claiming they had violated ethics and hiring laws. Palin, now the Republican vice-presidential candidate, told the Alaska Daily News that "there were no favors done for anybody."

But more intriguing than any email correspondence contained in the four boxes was what was not released: about 1100 emails. Palin's office provided McLeod with a 78-page list (PDF) cataloging the emails it was withholding. Many of them had been written by Palin or sent to her. Palin's office claimed most of the undisclosed emails were exempt from release because they were covered by the "executive" or "deliberative process" privileges that protect communications between Palin and her aides about policy matters. But the subject lines of some of the withheld emails suggest they were not related to policy matters. Several refer to one of Palin's political foes, others to a well-known Alaskan journalist. Moreover, some of the withhold emails were CC'ed to Todd Palin, the governor's husband. Todd Palin—a.k.a. the First Dude—holds no official state position (though he has been a close and influential adviser for Governor Palin). The fact that Palin and her aides shared these emails with a citizen outside the government undercuts the claim that they must be protected under executive privilege. McLeod asks, "What is Sarah Palin hiding?"
http://www.motherjones.com/mojoblog/...ret_email.html

The McCain/Palin response:

Quote:
The McCain-Palin campaign did not respond to phone and email requests for a comment.
Reply
post #471 of 474
11/26/08 at 12:40pm
I hate to bring this thread back from the dead (although it was kinda fun) but time's ticking on the Bristol Baby and Wedding watch.
Reply
post #472 of 474
11/27/08 at 4:27pm
Now that Palin's been shunted off back to Siberia, watch the shotgun wedding fall apart like the eventual marriage would've.
Reply
post #473 of 474
11/27/08 at 4:39pm
the only reason i question it is because there are no recent photos or footage of palin pregnant. Didn't she supposedly give birth to this baby 7-8 months ago? how come i have not seen any images of any kind of her pregnant.

oh and the fact her daughter was pregnant out of wedlock was apparently of limits still bugs me. i know its been said a hundred times but does anyoen believe for a minute if obama had a teen daughter and she was pregnant to some guy who had shit on his my space page even half as bad as palins guy it would have been off limits? obama never would have run in the primary let alone the general.

still annoys me.
Reply
post #474 of 474
11/27/08 at 5:06pm
Doesn't bug me. Shows how smart Obama is by declaring it off-limits.
Reply
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:
  Return Home
  Back to Forum: Political Discourse
CHUD.com Community › Forums › POLITICS & RELIGION › Political Discourse › Is Sarah Palin NOT the mother?