New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:

[Rec]

post #1 of 40
Thread Starter 
I have no idea if a thread has been made about this film, searching for Rec isn't particular helpful, but that's two Spanish horror films which have left me feeling really quite uncomfortable after watching them.

The first is Tesis and now there's this which does wonders with the tired old Zombie Apocalypse idea.

Essentially you have a young reporter and her camera man following a fire crew on their rounds. The first case they attend involves an old lady trapped in her apartment, turns out she's a bit past her sell by date and has a hankering for some human flesh.

Shit gets real, the Spanish police seal off the apartment building and the residents and fire crew find themselves having to stave off an outbreak of ZOMBIES.

What makes the film work is the format. Everything is shot from the perspective of the reporter's cameraman. Now before you start groaning fear not this is all for atmosphere than anything else and the actual gore in the film is still highly on show. What having a singular point of view, and the reporters attempts to interview the residents, does is make you really empathise with a few of the characters. The reporter herself, who I now have an immense crush on, is likeable enough but it's the firefighters and idiosyncratic residents which really work well. The use of a single camera also really gives a feeling of claustrophobia.

Also of note is the fact that everyone is on edge and bitching at each other. The dynamic is as close to the Thing as I've seen in a film, with people at each other's throats, officials trying to calm the public and the camera crew getting in everyone's way.

Added to this is the kind of cinematic violence which you don't expect from the format. The film is brutal and bloody when it wants to be with chunks of flesh getting torn out, characters getting thrown down stairwells and nice close ups of bite wounds.

It's the kind of film which had me on edge when I was watching the film and had me jittery after watching it.
post #2 of 40
A pretty decent entry in the docu-zombie genre. The interview scenes didn't work at all for me, and it's time for a moratorium on the night vision scares.

The remake is going to be a complete taint.
post #3 of 40
Quote:
Originally Posted by Minsky View Post
A pretty decent entry in the docu-zombie genre. The interview scenes didn't work at all for me, and it's time for a moratorium on the night vision scares.

The remake is going to be a complete taint.
Pretty much. Saw this at Fantasia. It's much much better than Diarrhea of the Dead, even with the interviews.

And did I see the poster right and saw Dexter's fuckable sister playing the reporter in the remake?
post #4 of 40
Thread Starter 
What works about the interviews is that it makes you feel a little bit comfortable after the chaos you've just seen. It's a calm before the storm, the fact that it serves to give some of the ancillary characters a little personality and set up some stuff for later on is greatness.
post #5 of 40
I didn't find the ancillary characters very compelling. I'm all for the steady second-act ratchet, but REC's bloated middle found me checking my watch more than biting my fingernails. Still, I really liked the last ten minutes.
post #6 of 40
Thread Starter 
I'm surprised that you felt a seventy minute film was bloated. I mean the interviews and the time between the fireman being dropped and the attacks is little more than ten or fifteen minutes.

And in terms of character work there were tons of little things I like. One of the main ones was the look Manu the fireman gives to the camera after the police officer has told them to switch off.

Also Martin: Diarrhea of the Dead? I know you hold being a retard as a badge of honour, but seriously?
post #7 of 40
Quote:
Originally Posted by Spike Marshall View Post
I'm surprised that you felt a seventy minute film was bloated. I mean the interviews and the time between the fireman being dropped and the attacks is little more than ten or fifteen minutes.

And in terms of character work there were tons of little things I like. One of the main ones was the look Manu the fireman gives to the camera after the police officer has told them to switch off.

Also Martin: Diarrhea of the Dead? I know you hold being a retard as a badge of honour, but seriously?
Diary of the Dead you humourless twat. Christ, you really have to be a boring individual to let it transpire on the internet, do you?

EDIT: As for the retard thing, aren't you the one who thing Akira is a masterpiece and that your hometown of Leeds, England, is exactly like Neo-Tokyo? I can't really beat that. Really.
post #8 of 40
Independent of running time, the interview stuff felt like padding and nearly stopped the film dead. If the interview act only spans ten minutes (did you verify this?), then that's an even worse indictment, because it sure seemed like a lot more. [REC] would have made a better short film.
post #9 of 40
Quote:
Originally Posted by Minsky View Post
the interview act only spans ten minutes .
Not it's not. It's longer than that. I get what our Spike is saying, but the movie would be better if it did like Cloverfield and let the spectator ride with the camera.
post #10 of 40
Thread Starter 
Quote:
Originally Posted by Martin Savage View Post
Diary of the Dead you humourless twat. Christ, you really have to be a boring individual to let it transpire on the internet, do you?

EDIT: As for the retard thing, aren't you the one who thing Akira is a masterpiece and that your hometown of Leeds, England, is exactly like Neo-Tokyo? I can't really beat that. Really.
I believe I was talking about about the rise of cult activity (Waco, the Sarin gas attacks) when I said that.

And I'm sorry if finding an adolescent play on the name of a film you don't like makes me boring.

Also in terms of dead time I was a little off. The old woman gets shot at the 18 minute mark and the Health Inspector does his inspection of the initial corpses at the 19 minute mark. So there's 20 minutes which are free of people being menaced by Zombies.
post #11 of 40
And it's a 20 minutes that needed much more economy, especially in a 70 minute film. Don't confuse economy with "zombies menacing people," which isn't what I mean at all. At best, the interview bit is character setup for unimportant and uninteresting characters, and at worst, it's 20 minutes of exposition. It could have been used more wisely.
post #12 of 40
Quote:
Originally Posted by Minsky View Post
And it's a 20 minutes that needed much more economy, especially in a 70 minute film. Don't confuse economy with "zombies menacing people," which isn't what I mean at all. At best, the interview bit is character setup for unimportant and uninteresting characters, and at worst, it's 20 minutes of exposition. It could have been used more wisely.
I always prefer when an editor intersperses that kind of stuff throughout (like in THE OFFICE series), to add context to scenes that follow or came before in a creative way. Order of events isn't as important as keeping things thematically consistant, relevant, and un-boring.
post #13 of 40
Thread Starter 
But that setup allows for the little girls turn to be handled economically in the third act and you get the setup for the intern's room as well as the dynamic between the reporter, police officer and firefighter. What the interviews do is allow the film to just keep going once the action starts as well as making the people about to get eaten vaguely recognisable. I mean without the interviews we wouldn't have gotten the insight into the slightly creepy and racist old man.
post #14 of 40
Quote:
Originally Posted by DARKMITE8 View Post
I always prefer when an editor intersperses that kind of stuff throughout (like in THE OFFICE series), to add context to scenes that follow or came before in a creative way. Order of events isn't as important as keeping things thematically consistant, relevant, and un-boring.
Yeah. If you can covertly roll exposition like that into an interesting scene, it's always so much better.
post #15 of 40
Thread Starter 
But is there any room for exposition once the little girl goes loco. I mean until they get to the top room they're running for their lives the entire time.
post #16 of 40
No, but ideally, I'd like to see as little exposition as possible.
post #17 of 40
Thread Starter 
But for the last third of the film to work we need to know that someone else is upstairs, that a dog has been sent to the vets and that there's an apartment where no one has been and which is apparently deserted.

Out of interest what did you make of all the possession stuff towards the end?
post #18 of 40
I liked the last act a lot, even though it felt a little like a Japanese survival horror game. The possession stuff wasn't belabored, which made it a little ambiguous and fun.
post #19 of 40
Thread Starter 
I'm glad I'm not the only who picked up the survival horror vibe. That last bit in the room is like something out of Silent Hill.
post #20 of 40
Still haven't seen this, but I did just catch the 6 Films to Keep You Awake collection, and Christmas Tale was the standout.
post #21 of 40
What did you think of the anthology as a whole?
post #22 of 40
Quote:
Originally Posted by Minsky View Post
No, but ideally, I'd like to see as little exposition as possible.
I like the gimmick used in CLOVERFIELD, where the new footage is recorded over existing backstory footage. It allows the viewer to get just enough info about the past relationship at ideal (and planned by the film-makers) times in mere glimpses. Worked for me.
post #23 of 40
I'm looking forward to seeing this flick after reading the Wiki plot synopsis. It sounds like a really interesting and original movie. Wonder if the remake is even going to be close to how this flick seems.
post #24 of 40
Thread Starter 
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rene (Mr.Eko) View Post
I'm looking forward to seeing this flick after reading the Wiki plot synopsis.
Don't you worry that you've spoiled the movie for yourself?
post #25 of 40
I'm not worried. Makes me want to see the movie even more now. I was thinking that it was just another of the run of the mill "first person shaky cam" flicks until I read the article.
post #26 of 40
Quote:
Originally Posted by Minsky View Post
What did you think of the anthology as a whole?
I thought it was pretty damn good actually. I was a bit surprised by the general quality of the films. It really puts our Masters of Horror to shame. Baby's Room and Christmas Tale are the two best, To Let was well made, but kind of tired, Spectre wasn't really a horror movie, but a decent drama, To Blame is blatantly right wing Catholic, but well made, and Real Friend was generally the weakest, I thought.
post #27 of 40
I'm cracking into them right now. Surprised at how good To Blame looks, although I'm pretty sure I know where it's going.
post #28 of 40
I've already seen [rec], but it's playing two nights at the Calgary Film Festival this month and I can't wait to experience the last 10 minutes of this with an audience.

Oh, it's going to be beautiful.
post #29 of 40
Would be nice if this and Fragiles got a Region 1 release sometime this fucking decade. Love Balaguero's other stuff and I intend to see his 6 Films... entry very soon.
post #30 of 40
By the way, since the demonic possession theme comes out in the last 10 minutes and the fact that the last monster you see is that "little" girl that was possessed, researched on and seems of be the source of the virus, it not really zombies but demons of some sort. The Vatican's research for a cure led to the transmission of that through saliva.

Still is a great movie, but I'm wondering about the quality of the announced sequel.
post #31 of 40
I am burned out on zombie movies, especially after Diarrhea of the Dead. But this movie was sensational. Horror movies don't usually get to me, but this one was one of the scariest I've seen in a long time. Especially the last 15 minutes or so. I don't think the remake will be able to top it.
post #32 of 40
I picked this up at a horror convention over the weekend, but didn't take the time to realize that it's a Region 2 copy. I'm a sad panda. Can't even sell the fucker on eBay either, because it's a copy.
post #33 of 40
BUMP now that this is finally out on DVD.

I watched this last night after midnight by myself. This is some scary shit.
I love that is was such a short film, so even the slower points didn't kill the early momentum. And the final act is really tense (I didn't even get annoyed with the jump scares, because the filmmakers didn't rely entirely on them to scare you). I would have loved to see this in a packed theater.

I'm a little bummed to see the directors decided to make a sequel instead of stretching their legs with something new, but I'll definitely give the next one a shot, since this film did some many things right.
post #34 of 40
Just got this in today thanks to Amazon.com (and TimeCrimes, yay!) and sat down with it with my date.

The last 10-15 minutes fucked my shit up. That's the scariest movie I've seen in a good long while. My date nearly cried her eyes out when that skinny bitch shows up. That was messed up.

I looked up the trailer for Quarantine, and jeez, it's damn near shot-for-shot.
post #35 of 40
Quote:
Originally Posted by BTSMGL View Post
I looked up the trailer for Quarantine, and jeez, it's damn near shot-for-shot.
It really is almost identical. I saw it in cinema when it released because I had to kill a couple of hours and nothing else was on at a good time. I prefer the original mainly because it came first (points for originality) and because the lead actress is much prettier. But as far as remakes go, Quarantine is a very good one. Redundant, but perfectly watchable.
post #36 of 40
I enjoyed [Rec] theatrically, despite a few telegraphed moments.
post #37 of 40
Finally saw this for the first time yesterday and loved it. I agree that the whole interview format was maybe a clunky vehicle for exposition, it didn't give me too much heartburn given the role of the TV crew. Otherwise I thought the first person POV was used immaculately thanks to some savvy work by the DP. Many of the attacks were shot through frames of sorts (in doorways, through a window, down the stairwell, edged by night vision, etc) which was a subtle but extraordinarily effective way of adding to the claustrophobia.

I also wondered about the demonic possession element, though. It being a Spanish movie, it didn't surprise me to see a religious ingredient added to the thematic stew, but at the same time, I'm not sure what they meant it to suggest. It was made clear throughout that they were dealing with a biological agent, but I guess that doesn't discount the whole demonic aspect. Perhaps this is what REC2 focuses on?
post #38 of 40
I also finally saw it and enjoyed it. I wasn't expecting the video game aspects. It's a better Resident Evil movie than any of the Resident Evil movies.
post #39 of 40
I really dug this. Better than the remake which is not so bad either, if maybe a bit unnecessary. The possession angle was new to me. Just really impressed.

I tend to see this as Blair Witch meets 28 Days Later, didn't notice the video gamey bits.
post #40 of 40
I might be overstating them. It's really the POV camera, but there's also a sort of go get the key, after you get the key watch a cut scene, now fight zombies, now go get another key thing to it. And the last bit kind of introduced a different kind of monster, and an attic that doesn't look like the stuff in the rest of the movie. The movie pretty much ends there, but it was kinda like those survival horror games that start you in one familiar surrounding and eventually you find a tunnel or something.

It's mostly Blair Witch meets 28 Days Later though.
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:
  Return Home
  Back to Forum: Creature Corner Main