The sequels worked for me as just good fun until about 6. 5 is a bit rocky. There is so much wrong with it but there are also so many little things I love. I thought endings to 4 and 5 were impressive but the subsequents sequels squandered what could have been.
No matter what is said about either version of "Halloween 6", it is a terrible movie. It worked for me at the time because as a fan, I just had a lot invested in the whole Loomis storyline but it just isn't very good.
H20 is such an overrated film. I'm just not interested in this whole Laurie Strode conquers her fears crap. There just aren't any genuine scares. Even though there are a few copycat scenes, they never manage to deliver that suspenseful feeling of Laurie running back to the Doyle house in the original. The thing is that scene works, even upon repeating viewings, better than the Hartnett-Williams in the fence scare does the first viewing. It feels like watching Neve Campbell being chased in a Scream movie. It's grating because it is so obvious that nothing bad is going to happen to her despite how they play it. H20 has such a safety net to it.
Resurrection is just garbage. Everything that was bad about H20 and then some. Bad character stereotypes ("I'm a cook so I'm going to relate Michael's behavior to poor diet even going so far as to explain this theory to him while he's trying to kill me."), lame Internet backstory, and Busta Rhymes doing kung-fu.
The Halloween remake actually intrigues me in just how sloppy and poorly conceived it is. I loved Devil's Rejects but this one felt like a massive step back for Zombie. The characters are so excessive in trying to beat their point across. In the first fifteen minutes, we get at least two characters who spend literally every second of their screen time swearing their asses off and being abusive so they the fact that they are jerks is clearly established. Same thing with Laurie's friends in the third act. It was like Zombie threw all these ideas he had up on screen and had no idea how to balance them all out.
No matter what is said about either version of "Halloween 6", it is a terrible movie. It worked for me at the time because as a fan, I just had a lot invested in the whole Loomis storyline but it just isn't very good.
H20 is such an overrated film. I'm just not interested in this whole Laurie Strode conquers her fears crap. There just aren't any genuine scares. Even though there are a few copycat scenes, they never manage to deliver that suspenseful feeling of Laurie running back to the Doyle house in the original. The thing is that scene works, even upon repeating viewings, better than the Hartnett-Williams in the fence scare does the first viewing. It feels like watching Neve Campbell being chased in a Scream movie. It's grating because it is so obvious that nothing bad is going to happen to her despite how they play it. H20 has such a safety net to it.
Resurrection is just garbage. Everything that was bad about H20 and then some. Bad character stereotypes ("I'm a cook so I'm going to relate Michael's behavior to poor diet even going so far as to explain this theory to him while he's trying to kill me."), lame Internet backstory, and Busta Rhymes doing kung-fu.
The Halloween remake actually intrigues me in just how sloppy and poorly conceived it is. I loved Devil's Rejects but this one felt like a massive step back for Zombie. The characters are so excessive in trying to beat their point across. In the first fifteen minutes, we get at least two characters who spend literally every second of their screen time swearing their asses off and being abusive so they the fact that they are jerks is clearly established. Same thing with Laurie's friends in the third act. It was like Zombie threw all these ideas he had up on screen and had no idea how to balance them all out.










