CHUD.com Community › Forums › POLITICS & RELIGION › Political Discourse › How to win, part 5: Initiate voter purge in Wisconsin
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:

How to win, part 5: Initiate voter purge in Wisconsin

post #1 of 8
Thread Starter 
Just remember this: quantified cases of voter fraud are ridiculously low in this country.

Quote:
Van Hollen's lawsuit will muck up election, voting officials say

Steven Elbow — 9/12/2008 7:27 pm

A lawsuit filed by the state attorney general Wednesday has the potential to slow down voting lines in what promises to be a staggering turnout for the Nov. 4 election, local voting officials said.

"It will disenfranchise voters. That's what we're concerned about," City Clerk Maribeth Witzel-Behl said.

Attorney General J.B. Van Hollen, a Republican, filed the lawsuit Monday in Dane County Circuit Court to get ineligible voters off the rolls. It calls for a court order mandating the Government Accountability Board to cross-check voters who have registered since Jan. 1, 2006, when federal Help America Vote Act legislation required that states implement a voter database to cross-check voter registrations with Department of Transportation, criminal and death records.

"We're working on plans to make sure we don't have long lines at the polls, make sure that the lines can move smoothly and quickly," Witzel-Behl said. "If we throw this into the mix, then it is going to slow things down."

The GAB didn't have the voter registration system up and running until Aug. 6 of this year and has said it will cross-check from that date on. Van Hollen said that to comply with federal law, the state has to go back to the federal deadline.

Van Hollen spokesman Kevin St. John said Van Hollen wants the GAB to verify voters who registered by mail since Jan. 1, 2006, because they didn't have to show an ID.

In a written response, Government Accountability Board Director Kevin Kennedy said the board is committed to preventing voter fraud, but Van Hollen's demands are too much, too soon.

"The board believes it would be counter-productive to rush this effort and to create a significant risk, at best of unnecessary hardship and confusion at the polls, and at worst the disenfranchisement of Wisconsin citizens with a clear and legitimate right to vote," he said.

If a judge rules in Van Hollen's favor, Witzel-Behl said city staffers would have to check 3,612 voters who registered by mail since the beginning of 2006. They have already processed 1,256 registrations that have been filed since the statewide database went online last month and have sent 100 letters to voters whose information didn't match and got 37 responses. The discrepancies typically come from names that are written differently on voter registration forms than on driver's licenses or driver's license numbers that are wrong or illegible.

"A lot of it is us trying to decipher their penmanship," she said.

Witzel-Behl said if Van Hollen's lawsuit prevails, the city will have to send letter to voters whose registrations are questioned, which the GAB has found to be more than 20 percent. The voters will have to clear up the discrepancies, and then the city has to run the information through another check.

And as the election approaches, the phones at clerks' offices get busier, so people calling back to resolve discrepancies will be less likely to get through.

"The closer we get to the election, the less time we have to clear things up," Witzel-Behl said.

...

Election politics: Van Hollen's move has elicited howls from Democratic officials and progressive activists because many believe the people most likely to be flagged by the voter database will vote Democratic, in part because Democratic-aligned groups have done the lion's share of voter registration.

State Democratic Chairman Joe Wineke said Van Hollen is "trying to distract and deny voters with fear-mongering."

"This ploy by the Republican attorney general is nothing more than a waste of taxpayer dollars and a cynical attempt to disenfranchise eligible voters less than two months before the November election," he said in a press release.

The Progressive group One Wisconsin Now called on Van Hollen to recuse himself from any legal action connected to the general election because his role as GOP presidential candidate John McCain's statewide campaign co-chair constitutes a clear conflict of interest.

"McCain talks about country first," said Scot Ross, the group's executive director. "Van Hollen practices party first."
Read the whole thing (especially if you live in Wisconsin or know people who do) here.
post #2 of 8
Thanks, yt...read, and posted to my Facebook page.
post #3 of 8
Thread Starter 
You are my hero!!!

While voter fraud is quantifiably rare, election tampering by Republicans is ubiquitous and remains hidden on a local level. It's really important that these communities which are affected by republican schemes are aware of what's going on.
post #4 of 8
I also put it on my facebook. I've got a lot of friends in Wisconsin, and a lot of them are talking about voting third party (Green, we're a very liberal bunch). I'm trying to explain to them how important WI is this year. My MI friend's voting isn't scaring me because MI isn't going to go McCain, but I'm not sure about WI.
post #5 of 8
Thread Starter 
Right on, Gabe Powers. You know, I'm not really against voting for a third party candidate, but only if there will be enough votes to make a statement about the way we run elections. In other words, I can see Ron Paul garnering a respectable voting bloc from primarily republicans, but also independents and democrats. But Cynthia McKinney and Ralph Nader will not yield enough votes to be heard and will draw votes away from Obama.

In other news, I just heard on the radio that the McCain campaign is sending Democrats phony absentee ballots with misleading information on them in Michigan, Florida and other swing states. I'm going to look for news stories about this, but this sounds like a new low in the election tampering that is now extremely broad in scope.
post #6 of 8
I'm assuming there aren't going to be any problems with MN absentee ballots, because that's probably how both my grilfriend and I are going to have to vote this year.
post #7 of 8
Thread Starter 
Quote:
Originally Posted by Gabe Powers View Post
I'm assuming there aren't going to be any problems with MN absentee ballots, because that's probably how both my grilfriend and I are going to have to vote this year.
MN is probably safe since it's not considered a swing state, but when you get your absentee ballot, just make absolutely sure it's legit.
post #8 of 8
Quote:
Originally Posted by Gabe Powers View Post
My MI friend's voting isn't scaring me because MI isn't going to go McCain, but I'm not sure about WI.
I always thought Michigan was more in play than Wisconsin. Scary though if Wisconsin goes McCain.

I plan on volunteering in Wisconsin on election day as Illinois is a gimmie and I'll just vote absentee. Obama had an email sent out to sign up but it changed and there is nothing for Election day. I keep checking but it's only canvasing on the weekends.

Do you know if the DNC in Wisconsin have anything? I'd love to just drive people(Dems) to the polls all day.
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:
  Return Home
  Back to Forum: Political Discourse
CHUD.com Community › Forums › POLITICS & RELIGION › Political Discourse › How to win, part 5: Initiate voter purge in Wisconsin