CHUD.com Community › Forums › MUSIC › Music › Greatest album runs
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:

Greatest album runs

post #1 of 134
Thread Starter 
The more and more I think about it, the Diamond Dave era of Van Halen is pretty damn remarkable. In only 6 years, they recorded 6 back-to-back hard rock triumphs:

Van Halen ---> Van Halen II ---> Women and Children First ---> Fair Warning ---> Diver Down ---> 1984

Not only did the Roth-era of VH keep their quality control in check, they managed to diversify their sound and push the boundaries of what a loud, celebratory hard rock outfit could achieve. Other than Van Halen II (an album that proved that their perfect debut was new fluke by any means, and reconfirmed the band's razor-sharp musicianship and chemistry), each and every album of this era has its own identity, changing the rules and playing field of a guitar-centric band and a frontman who established his own template for the word showmanship.
post #2 of 134
Nobody can touch Dylan's 60's run.

Bob Dylan ---> Nashville Skyline

Raw bluesy Folk to poetic lryicism to blazing, almost proto-punk, Rock 'n Roll; back to a sparse, stripped sound, & roots music; finally country Rock

I'll also add Prince from Dirty Mind to Purple Rain
post #3 of 134
Diver Down cops alot of flak for being the weakest VH album but there are some amazing tracks in there, Little Guitars, Dancing in the street (I think I actually prefer this to the original)

AC/DC-Let there be rock--->Powerage--->Highway to Hell--->Back in Black

Yeah, you could accuse AC/DC of just making the same album over and over again but that's still a great fucking run, Powerage is just great from beginning to end.
post #4 of 134
Metallica

Kill 'Em All ----> Ride the Lightning -----> Master of Puppets

You can sit there and debate their post-Black Album output, but the band started out with a sockful of quarters to the face with Kill 'Em All and stepped it up in terms of musical ability and songwriting up through Master of Puppets, at which point they were on the level of Iron Maiden and Judas Priest (at that time) as far as commercial viability, and probably more infulential to young musicians coming up.
post #5 of 134
Queen: 'Queen II' --> 'Sheer Heart Attack' --> 'A Night at the Opera' --> 'A Day at the Races' --> 'News of the World'.

They morphed from a hard rock (almost metal) band into a diverse pop/rock machine while maintaining a high degree of quality and creativity. They became hit/miss after this run (with the exception of 'The Game', which is near perfect).

Rush: '2112' --> 'A Farewell to Kings' --> 'Hemispheres' --> 'Permanent Waves' --> 'Moving Pictures' --> 'Signals'

Prog rock heros to small, concise rock anthems to synthesiser greatness. they fell off after that.
post #6 of 134
I'd say Led Zeppelin's entire output is up there. There may be slight dips on The Song Remains the Same and Coda, but one's live and the other is basically outtakes, but the official stuff from the first album to In Through the Out Door is remarkably solid.

Springsteen's output from Greetings to Nebraska is also consistently amazing, and that's even including the outtakes from this period that made it on Tracks.

I was tempted to include Pearl Jam, but it's pretty subjective where the run begins and ends (personally, I think No Code broke up an almost perfect run, but a lot of people love that one).

The first bunch of Elvis Costello albums (77-82), definitely - My Aim is True, This Year's Model, Armed Forces, Get Happy!!, Trust, Almost Blue, Imperial Bedroom. Even the next one, Punch the Clock, is halfway decent. Not a bad album, really, until Goodbye Cruel World in 84.
post #7 of 134
True, Zeppelin ended with a perfect track record and in my mind the only band with many albums over a decade to do so.




My first thought for a choice is Pink Floyd -- Meddle through The Wall


But we're all just pretty much listing FAMOUS famous bands,
and these album runs are why they are the biggest, best and brightest.
post #8 of 134
Pink Floyd: Dark Side of the Moon --> Wish You Were Here --> Animals --> The Wall --> The Final Cut.

I would have started with Meddle, but Obscured by Clouds is in between there, and has always been a bit "meh" for me.

Radiohead: Pablo Honey --> The Bends --> O.K. Computer --> Kid A --> Amnesiac--> Hail to the Thief --> In Rainbows

I'll be honest and say that Kid A has never been my personal cup of tea, but I think the album still has a lot of merit.

I would also throw Coheed's run in there, but I won't list it, as I'm sure it would get something thrown at me...
post #9 of 134
Quote:
Originally Posted by Andrew C View Post
True, Zeppelin ended with a perfect track record and in my mind the only band with many albums over a decade to do so.
I dunno, I don't have much love for Houses of the Holy....and that's completely disregarding the disposable Song Remains the Same soundtrack.
post #10 of 134
Quote:
Originally Posted by Andrew C View Post
But we're all just pretty much listing FAMOUS famous bands,
and these album runs are why they are the biggest, best and brightest.
Yeah, pretty much. They're either going to be famous or, at the very least, personal favorites. I'd probably list the respective outputs of the Replacements (at least six - Hootenanny through All Shook Down) and John Vanderslice (at least, Time Travel is Lonely through Emerald City, which, at five, is only one album short of the Roth VH run) for being consistently excellent runs, but I wouldn't expect to find a consensus on this. Vanderslice isn't that well-loved, generally, and a lot of Replacements fans don't rank the last two albums with Let It Be, Tim, and Pleased to Meet Me.

Without popular opinion backing you, you kind of run the risk of looking like an apologist. I'm sure a lot of Clash fans might try to make a case for all of their albums through Combat Rock, but it would probably come off like an enormous stretch to the casual fan to say that Give 'Em Enough Rope and Sandinista are anywhere near as good as London Calling and the first album.
post #11 of 134
I think the thread title hamstrings us a bit - saying that we're looking for the "greatest" runs means that, yeah, we are going to end up talking about Van Halen, Pearl Jam, and Elvis Costello. But if we want to be more obscure and personal, then I'm going to throw Ted Leo's Tyranny of Distance, Hearts of Oak, Shake the Sheets, and Living with the Living out there. I think the last of those is the weakest of the bunch, but they're all fantastic albums.

Also, in a shorter run, Rufus Wainwright's s/t through Want One. Unfortunately, he's really dropped the ball on Want Two and Release the Stars.

Okkervil River is three into a phenomenal run with Black Sheep Boy, The Stage Names, and The Stand Ins. I can't wait to see what they do next. They're currently my favorite band.
post #12 of 134
Quote:
Originally Posted by Chavez View Post
I dunno, I don't have much love for Houses of the Holy....and that's completely disregarding the disposable Song Remains the Same soundtrack.
On some days, Houses is my favorite. The only thing that really hurts it is that, on most days, it's classic rock radio's favorite, too, so I've probably heard all of those songs a few too many times.

Still, it sounds like they're having the most fun on that one with all the genre-hopping and pop stuff. Plus, it has nostalgic value for me, since "The Ocean" and "The Crunge" were the first rock songs that I figured out how to play on which I had to stay conscious of the unorthodox time changes.
post #13 of 134
Quote:
Originally Posted by MissZooey View Post
I think the thread title hamstrings us a bit - saying that we're looking for the "greatest" runs means that, yeah, we are going to end up talking about Van Halen, Pearl Jam, and Elvis Costello. But if we want to be more obscure and personal....
Or to come from a completely DIFFERENT end of the personal, Celtic Frost from Morbid Tales through Into the Pandemonium or Monster Magnet from Spine of God to Powertrip....both runs where, like the Metallica run, both bands improved on EVERY album, in terms of musicality, songwriting, and in Frost's case, scope, but nobody knows who the fuck those bands are.
post #14 of 134
This is remarkably predictable coming from me, and I don't know how we're defining "run," but Warren Zevon's albums from "Warren Zevon" through "Excitable Boy" and "Bad Luck Streak in Dancing School", covering roughly 1976 to 1980, are all pretty unbeatable. I mentioned this in the other thread, but that last Death Trilogy of albums are pretty great, too.

And I'm not sure if this counts (and is also predictable), but Stephen Sondheim's run of musicals (and cast recordings) in the seventies did for the post-Hammerstein musical what Rogers & Hammerstein did in terms of defining the genre*. Between 1970 and 1979, he wrote "Company," "Follies," "A Little Night Music," "Pacific Overtures," and "Sweeney Todd." And the great thing about those musicals is that they all work as pretty unified albums, too -- you don't really need to see the musicals to appreciate the music.

*Between 1943 and 51: "Oklahoma," "Carousel," "South Pacific," "The King & I."

Okay, I'll shut up now.
post #15 of 134
Bowie from 1971-1980, hopping genres from year to year:

Hunky Dory

The Rise and Fall of Ziggy Stardust and the Spiders From Mars

Aladdin Sane

Pin Ups (an album of covers, but good fun and released the same year as Aladdin Sane)

Diamond Dogs

Young Americans

Station To Station

Low

Heroes

Lodger

Scary Monsters

All done from the ages 24 - 33. Impressive.
post #16 of 134
I'll throw in Sly & The Family Stone's run from Dance to the Music to Fresh. Very eclectic funk. Runs the gauntlet of emotions from happiness to anger. At times trippy, yet, always soulful. A great band fronted by an underrated genius.

Also, can't forget Stevie:

Where I'm Coming From thru Songs In the Key of Life is just a brilliant run of perfect R & B /Pop.
post #17 of 134
Re: Van Halen

A fun band, but can we really call the Diamond Dave era diverse? VH 1 & 2 , if memory serves, were pretty interchangeable. Great Pop-Rock-nothing more, nothing less. Diver Down is a lukewarm dry run for 1984. Uneven as Hell, with maybe the worst cover of all time on it (Oh, Pretty Woman).

EDIT--Running on fumes this morning. Realize I kinda repeated your point. Anyways, dig the Van Halen, but critically it seems a stretch to put their run up with Dylan, The Stones, or Led Zep. As Artists they're just not in that league. They were always an empty cool.
post #18 of 134
Iron Maiden also I think had a remarkable run:

Killers --> The Number of the Beast --> Piece of Mind --> Powerslave --> Live After Death --> Somewhere in Time --> Seventh Son of a Seventh Son

And I know they aren't everyone's cup of tea, but Primus' first four albums I think are all pretty damn great

Frizzle Fry --> Sailing the Seas of Cheese --> Pork Soda --> Tales from the Punchbowl

Agreed on pretty much everything else that has been mentioned so far.
post #19 of 134
The first 5 studio albums from Talking Heads are unassailable. Particularly the Eno run of Fear of Music, Remain in Light, and Speaking in Tongues. The first two of those are basically perfect, while the last spawned most of their biggest singles.
post #20 of 134
The Fall's 1989-1986 run of:

Live at the Witch Trials
Dragnet
Grotesque (after the gramme)
Slates
Hex Enduction Hour
Room to Live (undilutable slang truth!)
Perverted by Language
The Wonderful and Frightening World of the Fall
This Nation's Saving Grace
Bend Sinister


A more obvious choice; Wire's slate of masterpieces (1977-1988), beginning when they started out - Pink Flag, Chairs Missing, 154 and A Bell is a Cup Until It is Struck. I think that may be, easily, the greatest run of great albums by a band, at least rivaling the Beatles...
post #21 of 134
re: Primus
Tales From The Punchbowl is where they indulged in too many of their proggy tendencies and amorphous, melody-free noodling for me and lost me forever. Their earlier albums still get a bit of play from time to time though. I'd say the strong run is the Suck on This EP through Pork Soda.
post #22 of 134
I am a huge fan of Ani Difranco's first 8 albums,from her self-titled debut up to and including Little Plastic Castles. I think all but a handful of those songs at least really good. I find almost nothing after that to be even marginally average. It's almost like she lost the ability to write a song I like.


I also love Murmur to Green, Vs. to Binaural,and Little Earthquakes to Boys For Pele (that's a little one),
post #23 of 134
Believe it or not, I was coming to say exactly the same thing Dreary Louse just has. re: The Fall and Wire. Saw Wire the other night actually. They're still incredible live and their new stuff is definitely worthy of their legacy.

With those bands off the slate I'd go with Sonic Youth's run from Bad Moon Rising though to Dirty, which if you include Ciccone Youth's the Whitey Album goes:

Bad Moon Rising, EVOL, Sister, Whitey Album, Daydream Nation, Goo, Dirty.

Goo's not my favourite to be honest with you, but there's more than enough on it to make it a worthy purchase. The first side, at least, is killer.

You could probably extend their run of great albums to include Experimental, Jet Set, Trash and No Star and Washing Machine if you're being generous about Jet Set...
post #24 of 134
Judas was too restrained. Rush made gold from 1975 to 1985:

Caress of Steel (1975)
2112 (1976)
All The World's A Stage (1976)
A Farewell to Kings (1977)
Hemispheres (1978)
Permanent Waves (1980)
Moving Pictures (1981)
Exit . . . Stage Left (1981)
Signals (1982)
Grace Under Pressure (1984)
Power Windows (1985)

Then Hold Your Fire broke the streak. I wouldn't consider Grace Under Pressure to be step down from Signals.
post #25 of 134
I present to thee, the RAMONES>> Ramones -> Leave Home -> Rocket to Russia -> Road to Ruin -> End of the Century -> Pleasant Dreams...

Then they started to blow.
post #26 of 134
Thread Starter 
Quote:
Originally Posted by DaveB View Post
I was tempted to include Pearl Jam, but it's pretty subjective where the run begins and ends (personally, I think No Code broke up an almost perfect run, but a lot of people love that one).
I'd personally include No Code in that run. The garage-rock feel of the rockers and the intimate nature of the ballads opened up the band's sound in ways that was unexpected at the time. Yield and Binaural is when the band's consistency started becoming a major issue for me. They picked up speed again with Riot Act and the self-titled, though.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Chavez View Post
I dunno, I don't have much love for Houses of the Holy....and that's completely disregarding the disposable Song Remains the Same soundtrack.
When I created this topic in the back of my head, Zeppelin was the other band that immediately came to mind other than VH, then I remembered that I wasn't too fond of Led Zeppelin III. Not bad by any means, but it doesn't hold its ground from front to back like their other albums.

Quote:
Originally Posted by RathBandu View Post
This is remarkably predictable coming from me, and I don't know how we're defining "run,"
Greatest runs = quality, consistency, time-frame, and artistic growth should be taken into account; and by using "greatest" I had no intention of limiting the discussion to the most popular artists...naturally, a knee-jerk reaction is to namecheck classic rock bands and what have you

Quote:
Originally Posted by Fat Elvis View Post
Re: Van Halen

A fun band, but can we really call the Diamond Dave era diverse? VH 1 & 2 , if memory serves, were pretty interchangeable. Great Pop-Rock-nothing more, nothing less. Diver Down is a lukewarm dry run for 1984. Uneven as Hell, with maybe the worst cover of all time on it (Oh, Pretty Woman).

EDIT--Running on fumes this morning. Realize I kinda repeated your point. Anyways, dig the Van Halen, but critically it seems a stretch to put their run up with Dylan, The Stones, or Led Zep. As Artists they're just not in that league. They were always an empty cool.
Actually, I think the Diamond Dave era of VH is underrated in many ways, and taken for granted. That incarnation of the band made it seem so easy and fun with what they were accomplishing that the notion of artistic merit could even be questionable. But there hasn't been (and likely won't ever be) a band of such ballsy display, ferocious energy, extraordinary chemistry, and bullet-proof musicianship all wrapped into one package since. There's a dark undercurrent all over Fair Warning, even a mean-spirited tone, that few hard rock albums have tempted to approach. 1984 was like a rebirth for the band's sound (and, ironically, their final bid before Van Hagar sadly took over the landscape)--bringing the pop-rock pendulum to a whole new level (the use of synthesizers hasn't aged the album at all, which proves far ahead of the curve the band were aiming), while still keeping their party-anthem roots.

We'll have to disagree on '(Oh) Pretty Woman'. LOVE that cover, though the opening segue way of 'Intruder' really makes that cover come alive.

The Stones had an amazing run with Beggars Banquet ---> Let It Bleed ---> Sticky Fingers ---> Exile On Main Street

however, I wouldn't say those 4 discs diversified their sound any more than Roth-era VH, other than Exile On Main Street

The Stones peaked way too early with Exile On Main Street. I'll always wonder what VH would've recorded next with Roth if he hadn't left, especially considering 1984 couldn't have been a better swan song.
post #27 of 134
I'm on a serious The Who bender at the moment.

The Who Sell Out (1967)
Tommy (1969)
Who's Next (1971)
Quadrophenia (1973)
The Who by Numbers (1975)
Who Are You (1978)

So many good tracks...
post #28 of 134
Quote:
Originally Posted by Eyeball Kid View Post
The first 5 studio albums from Talking Heads are unassailable. Particularly the Eno run of Fear of Music, Remain in Light, and Speaking in Tongues. The first two of those are basically perfect, while the last spawned most of their biggest singles.
Eno should be mentioned as having a great album run as producer. He did those Talking Heads albums you mention during the same years he did Bowie's Low, Heroes, and Lodger. Then in the 80s he turned U2 into U2.
post #29 of 134
Quote:
Originally Posted by Seabass Inna Bun View Post
Judas was too restrained. Rush made gold from 1975 to 1985:

Caress of Steel (1975)
2112 (1976)
All The World's A Stage (1976)
A Farewell to Kings (1977)
Hemispheres (1978)
Permanent Waves (1980)
Moving Pictures (1981)
Exit . . . Stage Left (1981)
Signals (1982)
Grace Under Pressure (1984)
Power Windows (1985)

Then Hold Your Fire broke the streak. I wouldn't consider Grace Under Pressure to be step down from Signals.
We'll have to agree to disagree, then. 'Caress of Steel', while interesting, is hardly a masterpiece. I'd call it a failed dry run for '2112'. I will agree with you on 'Grace Under Pressure' being essential, but 'Power Windows' is where they cross the line into an 80s production style that severely dates their style and sound. I still enjoy 'Power Windows' (and to a lesser extent, 'Hold Your Fire'), but I honestly don't feel that it's essential to their catalog.

On a side note, my first concert was Rush for 'Hold Your Fire', so that album will always have a soft spot in my heart.
post #30 of 134
I've got a hell of a lot more to say and reply to here, but for now I'll say:

Funkadelic: Maggot Brain -> America Eats Its Young -> Cosmic Slop -> Standing on the Verge of Getting It On -> Let's Take It to the Stage with America Eats Its Young as the only weak link. It's also perhaps fair to take all of the excellent Parliament album releases interwoven between those Funkadelic albums into account.

ETA: Actually, Parliament probably had a more consistent run in terms of consistent quality, although I'm a bigger fan of Funkadelic overall. Anyway, Parliament: Chocolate City -> Mothership Connection -> The Clones of Dr. Funkenstein -> Funkentelechy Vs. the Placebo Syndrome -> Live: P-Funk Earth Tour (if this even counts) -> Motor Booty Affair

But yeah, I know P-Funk isn't for everybody. Only for people who love fantastic, fun music that grooves asses to the bone. It's either that or this is all kind of subjective. Still a good topic, though.
post #31 of 134
Yes: 'The Yes Album' --> 'Fragile' --> 'Close to the Edge'

First off, they Steve Howe joined the band for 'The Yes Album', finalizing the classic lineup. The songs got much better and tighter musically. 'Fragile' took that all to the next level, and 'Close to the Edge' is where they peaked for long, long songs. From then on, self indulgence took its toll.
post #32 of 134
Quote:
Originally Posted by RyanC View Post
Funkadelic: Maggot Brain -> America Eats Its Young -> Cosmic Slop -> Standing on the Verge of Getting It On -> Let's Take It to the Stage with America Eats Its Young as the only weak link. It's also perhaps fair to take all of the excellent Parliament album releases interwoven between those Funkadelic albums into account.
I'd disagree that America Eats Its Young is a weak link, but I'm right with you here. It's a pity Free Your Mind...And Your Ass Will Follow is such a mess as the debut is at least on a par with the others you mentioned.

Perversely, I'm less of a fan of Parliament's albums. The P Funk:Earth Tour is far and away the one of theirs I listen to most often.
post #33 of 134
I think Radiohead has had a pretty spectacular run, Pablo Honey excluded.
post #34 of 134
Quote:
Originally Posted by Judas Booth View Post
We'll have to agree to disagree, then. 'Caress of Steel', while interesting, is hardly a masterpiece. I'd call it a failed dry run for '2112'. I will agree with you on 'Grace Under Pressure' being essential, but 'Power Windows' is where they cross the line into an 80s production style that severely dates their style and sound.
I didn't say Caress of Steel was a masterpiece, but it's quintessentially Rush. They have their sound and you can tell on Bastille Day and Lakeside Park. It's predecessors were just practice, but Caress of Steel is a Rush Album. As for Power Windows, it has Marathon so it goes on my list. That was the last track that really showcased their talents until 'The Main Monkey Business' came along, to my mind.

Although I won't deny that they really fell in love with synthesizers in the early eighties. It takes Rush to make really, really good music with synthetic drums, too.
post #35 of 134
Bjork was on fire for over a decade with

Debut - Post - Homogenic - Vespertine - Medulla

Each one great, each one very different from the last. I didn't include Telegram (remixes), Selmasongs (soundtrack), or Volta (latest album), but it's not like they were bad.
post #36 of 134
...and Nico, White Light/White Heat & Loaded. From them to eternity.
post #37 of 134
^ I second Bjork's run, and kudos for including the often misunderstood Medulla. Volta was a rather sad disappointment for me - something I wasn't expecting at all.

I also second that pre-Topographic three album Yes run. Can you believe they created all three within a two year period??

I think Tom Waits has been impressively varied and consistent from Swordfishtrombones onwards, with several classics and still not a bad one to be found.

Nick Drake only did three but as a result has just about as flawless a catalogue as you're likely to find.
post #38 of 134
The Replacements: Let it Be, Tim, Pleased to Meet Me

The Clash: Self Titles, Give Em Enough Rope, London Calling, Sandinista
post #39 of 134
For my money, The Police didn't put out a bad album.
post #40 of 134
Quote:
Originally Posted by Richard Dickson View Post
For my money, The Police didn't put out a bad album.
Neither did Sleater-Kinney. They quit when they were still brilliant.
post #41 of 134
Thread Starter 
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ratty View Post
Neither did Sleater-Kinney. They quit when they were still brilliant.
Other than their debut (which isn't bad, just not great)...the S-K run started with Call the Doctor, but even saying that, Dig Me Out is when the words "incredible" and "flawless" began to emerge.
post #42 of 134
I'll suggest that Public Enemy's run from Yo! Bum Rush The Show to Fear of a Black Planet was as good as Hip-Hop ever got. Punk party music; with lyrics as good as the beats.

Also partial, in a more subjective way, to the Beastie Boys run from Licenced to Ill to Check Your Head. Each album practically reinvented the band sonically, while keeping the same spirit, and sense of playfulness.

Want to make a case for RUN DMC. RUN DMC to Tougher Than Leather, but can't. Bit too much filler surrounding the classics.
post #43 of 134
Not counting collaborations and soundtracks, Tom Waits musical output has gotten better and better in my opinion. When most artists jump the shark and start to repeat themselves and lose relevance as they get older, Waits matures like a fine wine, doing some of his most integral and experimental musical output the older he gets...

Heartattack and Vine ---> Swordfishtrombones ---> Rain Dogs ---> Bone Machine ---> Mule Variations ---> Real Gone

Thats a near-25 year run right there.

I also have to agree with DaveB's assessment of Pearl Jams run up to No Code - they officially went from being the greatest band on earth for me to being just 'there' after that album, but Ten-Vs-Vitalogy are a hell of a trilogy.
post #44 of 134
As for more current bands, I really think all five of Strapping Young Lad were great. Though they are metal, so about most of this thread isn't gonna give a shit anyway.

Heavy as a Really Heavy Thing ----> City ----> Strapping Young Lad ----> Alien ----> The New Black
post #45 of 134
Quote:
Originally Posted by Chris Miller View Post

Radiohead: Pablo Honey --> The Bends --> O.K. Computer --> Kid A --> Amnesiac--> Hail to the Thief --> In Rainbows


Mass culture has been brainwashed by Radiohead.
Passing grade, sure.
Geat album runs? nah.
post #46 of 134
Neil Young:

Everybody Knows This is Nowhere => After the Gold Rush => Harvest => On the Beach => Time Fades Away => Tonight's the Night => Zuma
post #47 of 134
Tool: Ænema through... well, the run hasn't stopped yet.

The Mars Volta: Francis the Mute - Amputechture
post #48 of 134
Quote:
Originally Posted by joeypants View Post
Tool: Ænema through... well, the run hasn't stopped yet.

The Mars Volta: Francis the Mute - Amputechture
I would like to go on the record as saying that Tool is a terrible, awful, shitty band.
post #49 of 134
Most of my favorites have been mentioned already. I'd add Rancid, who's first album was shit, but have been on a roll ever since (with a slight drop with Indestructable), and Muse, who like Bjork has kept a distinct style despite making every album sound different.

Ok, maybe not as different as Bjork.
post #50 of 134
Quote:
Originally Posted by devincf View Post
I would like to go on the record as saying that Tool is a terrible, awful, shitty band.
And I thought I was the only one who didn't like them
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:
  Return Home
  Back to Forum: Music
CHUD.com Community › Forums › MUSIC › Music › Greatest album runs