T2

Michael Bay is the next obvious evolutionary step along the road paved by the Camerons and Tony Scotts of the world. Cameron is simply far more successful at it and because his Gone With The Wind On Water was showered in oscars and his Dances With Blue Man Group recently made so many people such a large amount of money, his output is somehow seen as more 'legitimate'or 'prestigious' - but make no mistake, Cameron may have convinced himself he's an artiste, but he's cynically exploiting the market just as much as Bay is - and whats worse the very people that point to Bays failing seem to be blind to many of Jims similarities.
I don't think Cameron thinks he's an artiste. He's very much a blue collar type workman and his attitude reflects that. Just listen to his interviews...I think it's the media that's given him that title. His ego is huge, but he's earned it (the two highest grossing films of all time, beating his own record? Its a lifetime pass as far as ego), and he seems to use his box office clout to ADVANCE cinema as a pioneer, not bang more supermodels like Bay...I don't see Bay or Spielberg inventing cameras or trying to better the workflow of filmmaking for the craftsmen. Cameron's films can be a bit shallow with content, sure, but he's essentially an ACTION filmmaker. He hasn't made E.T., or Schindler, or The Terminal. He made Titanic because he wanted to dive the wreck, seriously that's the only reason he made it (yes, he admitted this many times) And I find the very thing you accuse Cameron of can easily be attributable to Spielberg. I think it's easy to lump Bay in with Cameron because they play in the same sandbox...but their films are night and fucking day.





