Quote:
Originally Posted by Justin Clark 
For Your Eyes Only? They cheap out on Blofeld's death and the score is godawful, but that's still the only film outside of Spy Who Loved Me worth a damn during Roger Moore's run. I'd love to hear the justification for this one.
There's a case to be made for Usual Suspects, even if I disagree. I'd like to hear this one too.
|
For Your Eyes Only is a great Bond movie on paper. Unfortunately, it's sunk by a creepy, too-old Moore. Always too pussy to be a real James Bond, his discomfort with the violence shows, ruining some what should be classic moments. The fact that the legion of Moore apologists cite this as an example of his tenure not only being a success, but preferable to the Connery glory is a failure on the part of Geek nation.
Also the disco score sucks.
The Usual Suspects is a case of the emperor having no clothes. A post-Tarantino rip-off; the gimmicky-nonsensical twist ending, aided by a showy Spacey performance, evidently suckered a generation into thinking this faux bit of cool was the real deal. Closer to
Boondock Saints than
Reservoir Dogs or
Pulp Fiction, I find the acting & dialogue at times atrocious.
The performances by everyone except DelToro, Spacey, and maybe Byrne, are awful. A lot of miscasting. Steven Baldwin?!! Ughh. (I'm not sure if that was an attempt at acting, or his natural assholeness shining through) Kevin Pollack? Am I the only one who wanted to knock that baseball cap off his head? ([Even Zed from
Pulp shows up and takes me right out)
Bryan Singer doesn't really impress me. I'd rather watch McQuarrie's
Way of the Gun or truth be told, even
Things To Do In Denver When You're Dead. (I know) Actually, I do like
Apt Pupil. This, his so-called crowning achievement, just leaves me cold.