Holy shit this looks amazing.
CHUD.com Community › Forums › DVD, HOME THEATER, & GADGETS › DVD General Discussion › Sleeping Beauty on Bluray
Join Now
Be a part of the community.
It's free, join today!
Recent Reviews
-
if u like the previous movies this one fits right in..special effects are great plenty of action from begin to end and a great plot
-
This movie was pretty awsome if u like the 80's B horror. Its on Netflix
-
Where the hell are u gonna find gravey flavored condoms in any other movie ...........huh............... I LOVE U TURKEY!!!!!!!!!!!!
-
I was very excited to see the American Reunion movie. I saw American Pie just after college and remembered it was quite funny. Jim, Michelle, Oz, Heather, Stifler reunite for their high school...
-
this is the song to have fun on.
Sleeping Beauty on Bluray
post #2 of 16
10/8/08 at 2:29am
- Starving Dog
- Trader Feedback: 0
- is writing and writing...
- offline
- 5,548 Posts. Joined 12/2002
- Location: Norman, Oklahoma
- Reputation: 10
- Select All Posts By This User
And it comes with a copy of the movie on DVD in the Blu-Ray case as well. That is great because my wife likes to fall asleep to movies she likes and we only have one Blu-ray player, and its not in teh bedroom.
That made her very happy.
That made her very happy.
post #3 of 16
10/8/08 at 11:35am
- Martianman
- Trader Feedback: 0
- Registered Alien
- offline
- 11,088 Posts. Joined 4/2001
- Location: Mars, of course
- Reputation: 162
- Select All Posts By This User
Sold, if that's the case. That's what I wish all of them would do. Just give me a bare-bones movie on a DVD. Not even a menu. You just put the DVD in the player, and the movie starts.
- Scott
- Trader Feedback: 0
- GLASSES MAKE ME SMART
- offline
- 5,000 Posts. Joined 8/2005
- Location: Radio Shack
- Reputation: 11
- Select All Posts By This User
Apparently, the original film was on 70mm, making it a 2.55:1 aspect ratio. The sides had to be cropped because it just wouldn't fit on a DVD. This is probably why this was the first Disney classic released on Bluray. I haven't seen this movie in 20 years, and it still holds up (especially the big fight at the end. I want to airbrush it on the side of a van.). It's just so damn well-drawn.
This was the last animated feature before Disney's death, ensuing films like 101 DALMATIANS and THE ARISTOCATS had purposefully rough-looking backgrounds painted outside the ink and the thick-lined rough-sketch cel-animated characters. SLEEPING BEAUTY, on the other hand, employs perfect geometry decades before TOY STORY.
Now I have to find a way to explain to my friends why I own this.
This was the last animated feature before Disney's death, ensuing films like 101 DALMATIANS and THE ARISTOCATS had purposefully rough-looking backgrounds painted outside the ink and the thick-lined rough-sketch cel-animated characters. SLEEPING BEAUTY, on the other hand, employs perfect geometry decades before TOY STORY.
Now I have to find a way to explain to my friends why I own this.
post #5 of 16
10/8/08 at 10:24pm
- Raspberry Leper
- Trader Feedback: 0
- Decorates Ladycakes
- offline
- 2,877 Posts. Joined 1/2006
- Reputation: 214
- Select All Posts By This User
Aurora's ass.
post #6 of 16
10/8/08 at 10:54pm
- Xion
- Trader Feedback: 0
- AKA Evan McCoy
- offline
- 1,237 Posts. Joined 2/2005
- Location: Canada
- Reputation: 72
- Select All Posts By This User
Works for female characters played by males in WoW. Picked this up for my little girl, can't wait to watch it with her. I think it's one of the few disney movies from that era that I haven't actually seen.
post #7 of 16
10/12/08 at 2:19pm
- Malmordo
- Trader Feedback: 0
- L'angelo mysterioso
- offline
- 1,319 Posts. Joined 9/2006
- Reputation: 26
- Select All Posts By This User
I know how you feel. I love this movie, but I'm embarrassed to stand anywhere near the display at Best Buy.
post #8 of 16
10/12/08 at 3:14pm
- reggie-wanker
- Trader Feedback: 0
- Nobody introduces ME.
- offline
- 2,507 Posts. Joined 1/2007
- Location: ?
- Reputation: 10
- Select All Posts By This User
Quote:
|
Apparently, the original film was on 70mm, making it a 2.55:1 aspect ratio. The sides had to be cropped because it just wouldn't fit on a DVD. This is probably why this was the first Disney classic released on Bluray. I haven't seen this movie in 20 years, and it still holds up (especially the big fight at the end. I want to airbrush it on the side of a van.). It's just so damn well-drawn.
This was the last animated feature before Disney's death, ensuing films like 101 DALMATIANS and THE ARISTOCATS had purposefully rough-looking backgrounds painted outside the ink and the thick-lined rough-sketch cel-animated characters. SLEEPING BEAUTY, on the other hand, employs perfect geometry decades before TOY STORY. Now I have to find a way to explain to my friends why I own this. |
Aspect ratio and animation nerdiness follows:
Technirama was a horizontal 35mm format similar to VistaVision but with a slight anamorphic squeeze, filming at 2.25:1 aspect ratio with a huge negative size compared to regular 35mm. Reductions to standard vertical anamorphic 35mm prints were cropped to 2.35:1, 70mm prints were slight enlargements from the horizontal 35mm negatives, that were cropped to the standard 70mm ratio of 2.2:1. The cropping in either direction was so minor as to be negligible. The format was also used for BLACK CAULDRON decades later.

While it's true that SLEEPING BEAUTY and BLACK CAULDRON were the only American animated films produced in a large format process, they're often incorrectly claimed to be the only ones ever made that way. Japan produced at least one large-format animated film, not including the first demo reel for the US-Japan coproduction that eventually became LITTLE NEMO: ADVENTURES IN SLUMBERLAND - that demo directed by future Studio Ghibli director Yoshifumi Kondo. LITTLE NEMO went on to be made by a completely different staff in flat 35mm - but the final film's opening was certainly inspired by Kondo's 70mm demo. As for what that Japanese animated film that was actually made in 70mm was, I couldn't tell you offhand, but I saw the trailer somewhere once and they were quite upfront about the format. I can't find that trailer at the moment.
No excuses needed for owning SLEEPING BEAUTY. If a friend doesn't like it kick 'em in the dick a couple of times and kindly ask them to repeat themselves. If there's no dick to kick them in, it's probably a non-issue.
post #9 of 16
10/12/08 at 8:56pm
- moovyphreak
- Trader Feedback: 0
- offline
- 11,439 Posts. Joined 5/2001
- Location: Spartanburg, SC, USA
- Reputation: 10
- Select All Posts By This User
Quote:
|
Apparently, the original film was on 70mm, making it a 2.55:1 aspect ratio. The sides had to be cropped because it just wouldn't fit on a DVD. This is probably why this was the first Disney classic released on Bluray. I haven't seen this movie in 20 years, and it still holds up (especially the big fight at the end. I want to airbrush it on the side of a van.). It's just so damn well-drawn.
This was the last animated feature before Disney's death, ensuing films like 101 DALMATIANS and THE ARISTOCATS had purposefully rough-looking backgrounds painted outside the ink and the thick-lined rough-sketch cel-animated characters. SLEEPING BEAUTY, on the other hand, employs perfect geometry decades before TOY STORY. Now I have to find a way to explain to my friends why I own this. |
post #10 of 16
10/12/08 at 10:12pm
- reggie-wanker
- Trader Feedback: 0
- Nobody introduces ME.
- offline
- 2,507 Posts. Joined 1/2007
- Location: ?
- Reputation: 10
- Select All Posts By This User
That Japanese film I was thinking of was 1978's ORPHEUS OF THE STARS aka METAMORPHOSES aka WINDS OF CHANGE - apparently a US-Japan co-production that was made in English. It's Bakshi-esque madness from Sanrio, the company most famous for Hello Kitty. Released as WINDS OF CHANGE on VHS by RCA/Columbia. Investigation shows it was a blow-up from 35mm to 70mm, so Disney can indeed claim their large-format animated films are the only ones... as far as I can tell.
post #11 of 16
10/16/08 at 1:19pm
- Sharpel007
- Trader Feedback: 0
- Down is the new up.
- offline
- 2,079 Posts. Joined 11/2004
- Location: Somewhere near the M4, in Albion
- Reputation: 10
- Select All Posts By This User
Correction Sleeping Beauty was released in 1957 although it had been in development for at least 6 years or more depending how technical you want to get, Walt knew the story was lacking, but released it any way of course he was busy playing with Disneyland and TV. He died of course in 66 so the Jungle Book was truly the last movie to benefit from his (all be it diminished) presence. 101 Dalmations actually lets see you all of the artist real work, unfortunately the movies that followed lacked the story to match the art work. The animation is still the same under Sleeping Beauty it just has not gone through an Inbetweener and lots of other cleening up. It was also the first time and last time the characters where styled to match the backgrounds, which either works or not depending on your stances to animation.
For those who love it that much head over to Michael Sporn Blog, in the recent past he has posted a massive amount of pre-production artwork which is more gorgeous than the film.
http://www.michaelspornanimation.com/splog/
And here is A Q&A about the restoration, and more info on the scope issues
http://animated-views.com/2008/once-...s-restoration/
For those who love it that much head over to Michael Sporn Blog, in the recent past he has posted a massive amount of pre-production artwork which is more gorgeous than the film.
http://www.michaelspornanimation.com/splog/
And here is A Q&A about the restoration, and more info on the scope issues
http://animated-views.com/2008/once-...s-restoration/
post #12 of 16
10/16/08 at 1:23pm
- matches
- Trader Feedback: 0
- Hey now!
- offline
- 5,831 Posts. Joined 1/2005
- Location: South Loop
- Reputation: 10
- Select All Posts By This User
I bought this yesterday under the guise of getting it for my girlfriend to watch. But, it was really for me.
- Scott
- Trader Feedback: 0
- GLASSES MAKE ME SMART
- offline
- 5,000 Posts. Joined 8/2005
- Location: Radio Shack
- Reputation: 11
- Select All Posts By This User
Sharpel, can you explain to me what's with the sketchy, sloppy-looking characters and background in DALMATIANS? Was it just a style that was popular at the time?
post #14 of 16
10/16/08 at 7:56pm
- FrankCobretti
- Trader Feedback: 0
- knows thee not, old man.
- offline
- 5,193 Posts. Joined 3/2004
- Location: Gone Global
- Reputation: 16
- Select All Posts By This User
What's wrong with, "Fuck you. I like what I like."?
post #15 of 16
10/16/08 at 8:05pm
- DARKMITE8
- Trader Feedback: 0
- Monster CHOW
- offline
- 18,507 Posts. Joined 2/2006
- Location: Camp Crypto Lake
- Reputation: 627
- Select All Posts By This User
For some reason, Aurora always reminded me of Julie Newmar in the face (eyes, lips).


It was the new xeroxing method they used. They'd transfer the rougher pencils ontop the cels with a machine instead of the classic and skill-required hand-inking.
http://www.celshader.com/classic/ink/ink.html


Quote:
|
Sharpel, can you explain to me what's with the sketchy, sloppy-looking characters and background in DALMATIANS? Was it just a style that was popular at the time?
|
http://www.celshader.com/classic/ink/ink.html
post #16 of 16
10/16/08 at 8:07pm
- HBarr
- Trader Feedback: 0
- Part of the 5%
-
- offline
- 4,769 Posts. Joined 8/2003
- Location: Lakeland, Florida
- Reputation: 12
- Select All Posts By This User
We can't all be Frank Cobretti's. 
A more diplomatic response is probably needed.

A more diplomatic response is probably needed.
Return Home
Back to Forum: DVD General Discussion
- Sleeping Beauty on Bluray
CHUD.com Community › Forums › DVD, HOME THEATER, & GADGETS › DVD General Discussion › Sleeping Beauty on Bluray
Currently, there are 203 Active Users
(14 Members and 189 Guests)
Recent Discussions
- › G.I. JOE 2 TO RETALIATE IN MARCH OF 2013 INSTEAD 1 minute ago
- › wtf are you playing... 18 minutes ago
- › The Semi Official Blu-Ray Thread 26 minutes ago
- › The 2012 Elections Thread 1 hour, 3 minutes ago
- › Happy 40th, Cameron\! 1 hour, 51 minutes ago
- › Game Of Thrones Season 2: Throne Harder SPOILER FREE 2 hours, 5 minutes ago
- › Hannibal (2001) 2 hours, 31 minutes ago
- › All your euros are belong to Greece. 2 hours, 44 minutes ago
- › Dating Tips/Advice 2 hours, 48 minutes ago
- › Seattle Attorney Claims U.S. Sent Him On Time Travels 2 hours, 55 minutes ago
View: New Posts | All Discussions
Recent Reviews
- › Transformers: Dark of the Moon(2011) by trubrat
- › Slugs (Midnight Madness) by branbran77
- › ThanksKilling(2009) by branbran77
- › American Reunion by Mom2C
- › Motivation by tameka
- › Love Again by tameka
- › Your Highness(2011) by Leviathan Joe
- › Akira(1988) by andrewhawkins
- › Trainspotting(1996) by andrewhawkins
- › Night of the Creeps [Blu-ray] by andrewhawkins
View: More Reviews
New Articles
- › Live! Manchester City vs Bayern Munich -... by ahooo
- › Chu Ishikawa by andrewhawkins
- › Followers And Following by chudlurker
- › Daily Prize Wiki by Renn Brown
- › Guy Dot Com by Glory 2my Naval
- › Glitter by Anderson
- › How To Properly Report A Bug by BruceL
- › Preventing Flame Wars by Rourkefan
- › My Fan Made Movie Posters by Litmus Configuration
- › Bruce Wayne by Hammerhead
View: New Articles | All Articles
Home | Reviews | Forums | Articles | My Profile
About CHUD.com Community | Join the Community | Advertise
© 2012 CHUD.com Community is powered by Huddler | FAQ | Support | Privacy/TOS | Site Map
About CHUD.com Community | Join the Community | Advertise
© 2012 CHUD.com Community is powered by Huddler | FAQ | Support | Privacy/TOS | Site Map




