CHUD.com Community › Forums › SPECIFIC FILMS › Films in Release or On Video › Saving Private Ryan
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:

Saving Private Ryan - Page 4

post #151 of 166
I always thought that the washed out flags were a reference to a similar shot in Triumph of the Will.
post #152 of 166
Quote:
Originally Posted by Richard Dickson View Post
I will go to my death arguing that the washed-out way those flags were shot was never intended to be the least bit flag-wavingly patriotic.
I read this opinion somewhere (possibly in "The Complete Spielberg" by Empire writer Ian Freer) quite some time ago, so you're definitely not alone in it. Makes perfect sense.
post #153 of 166
The flags are also transparent. Spielberg could've left all the flags in as bookends and I would've been happy. I've always read the flashbacks as a very purposeful narrative cheat myself ('psyche!! It was Ryan all along!!), all these solid arguments to the contrary notwithstanding.
post #154 of 166
Quote:
Originally Posted by MoonBaseNick View Post
I always thought that the washed out flags were a reference to a similar shot in Triumph of the Will.
Pretty sure Spielberg was actually quoting a famous still by Robert Mappelthorpe.
post #155 of 166
Quote:
Originally Posted by MoonBaseNick View Post
I always thought that the washed out flags were a reference to a similar shot in Triumph of the Will.
Yeah, don't see Spielberg quoting Triumph of the Will...
post #156 of 166
yeah you might be right, I remember hearing that somewhere...just don't remember who said it. Then again I could be wrong
post #157 of 166
Quote:
Originally Posted by Hammerhead View Post
Pretty sure Spielberg was actually quoting a famous still by Robert Mappelthorpe.
good point.

post #158 of 166

I recently watched this film and The Thin Red Line, and when thinking about the films in hindsight, I just kind of hate this movie. Its an engaging film, but from the flag-waving bookends to the sappy music, I just feel that it fails on so many levels. For a film that prides itself on being aesthetically faithful and realistic so as to honor the veterans of the war, the movie shows no respect for the people who fought it. Many of the soldiers in the film die in an ironic fashion (Like the soldier who takes off his helmet only to be hit by a stray bullet in the opening), and I think that kind of dark humor dilutes the serious nature of war. Sure the blood and guts are all there, but not the humanity. The German enemies are also portrayed despicably, those who aren't mowed down are painted as treacherous villains without any grace, and the film gives off the feeling that Spielberg doesn't understand that opposition was facing the same hardships as our troops. WAR IS HELL! seems to be the theme of the movie, and the men in the battlefield are divided into those who accept it, and those who don't (like Upham), who are put into such a negative light its surreal. I don't know, I just feel like the whole film acts as propaganda to further glorify the Second World War.

 

post #159 of 166

Well I think that is essentially correct, and Spielberg is open about the film being a "love letter" to the Armed Forces....the US Armed Forces. This is a film shot from the American's point of view, about America's sacrifices. Though the one German solider we meet does play an important role late in the film :)

post #160 of 166

Let me say a few things first yes this film fumbles the ball a few times in a huge way (Damon is right).

 

However this is a film that will be remembered in 50 years SiL will not. This is very similar to The Kings Speech and say Inception.

 

The Academy is bullshit and usually gets things wrong.

 

This is one of Steven Spielberg's greatest cinematic accomplishments and yes that counts.

 

It changed the way movies were shot and the way we saw war films in general.

 

Oh and I love The Thin Red Line too.

 

 

post #161 of 166

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mac View Post
For a film that prides itself on being aesthetically faithful and realistic so as to honor the veterans of the war, the movie shows no respect for the people who fought it. Many of the soldiers in the film die in an ironic fashion (Like the soldier who takes off his helmet only to be hit by a stray bullet in the opening), and I think that kind of dark humor dilutes the serious nature of war. Sure the blood and guts are all there, but not the humanity. 


This is kind of a weird complaint.  What are some other examples of the dark humor?  I always felt like SPR was practically drenched in humanity, almost to a fault - stuff like Wade crying out to his mama, Vin Diesel passing off the note to his father, etc may be extremely heavy handed and manipulative at times, but I don't think it ever trivializes the seriousness of war or the sacrifices made.

 

I don't want to sound combative, but its also kind of weird that you'd prefer this movie humanize the Nazis.  I'm sure there were German soldiers who fought out of a sense of duty / loyalty to their country and not the Nazi regime, but it doesn't get much more black-and-white anywhere else in history - Nazis were horrible horrible people. 

 

post #162 of 166

 

Quote:

Many of the soldiers in the film die in an ironic fashion (Like the soldier who takes off his helmet only to be hit by a stray bullet in the opening), and I think that kind of dark humor dilutes the serious nature of war.

 

 

Maybe the way it's done is as blatantly ironic as you suggest (I haven't seen the movie in awhile, so I'm not sure), but based on your description, I don't think it sounds that way. It sounds more like a cautionary lesson about being careless than an example of dark humour through ironic death. It's like saying a soldier can't just take off their helmet because it's making them uncomfortable since the slightest misstep could cause immediate death.

 

When it comes to whether or not Nazis should be humanized or treated as straight up villains, I think it can be a "damned if you do, damned if you don't" situation. I heard people thought "Downfall" humanized Hitler too much, and it didn't come close to making him a sympathetic person who people could root for. I remember how Roger Ebert wondered why the Ralph Fiennes Nazi in "Schindler's List" was clearly psychotic and if he couldn't have been portrayed differently. It's an interesting question, but I think depicting him that way could have just opened up a whole new can of worms as people would protest Nazis being portrayed in even the most remotely positive way.


Edited by Naisu Baddi - 4/26/11 at 9:37am
post #163 of 166

I recommend A Midnight Clear to those who haven't seen it and want to see a different side of WW2 and Germans.

post #164 of 166
Thread Starter 

I ended up watching Saving Private Ryan and The Big Red One this week and it sort of compounds my issues with Saving Private Ryan, especially the Normandy scene. I think my distaste for the sequence is largely due to how it was co-opted by movie and videogames (ESPECIALLY videogames) but that media attention sort of casts a different light on the sequence. At twenty minutes long the Normandy sequence stops being a treatise on the horrors and insanity of war and becomes a cavalcade of horror setpieces. There's just horror set-piece after horror set-piece, faces caved in, guts flayed, people on fire, people blown in half, burning nazis, that the entire thing becomes almost numbing to me. The Big Red One gets a similar idea across, but does so with far less blatant gore and in a far shorter time.

 

At the end of the day my reaction to the visceralness of the Normandy opening is that I hate the people who planned that attack, I hate the military machine which sent those men into a meat-grinder, I hate the forces which meant they even had to be. It doesn't venerate the dead to me, it just makes them look like victims.

post #165 of 166

QUESTION: if The Big Red One had cone out in the age of video games, would it have been co-opted in the same way as Saving Private Ryan? If so , would it affect your opinion of that movie as it obviously has of Saving Private Ryan?


Edited by Cylon Baby - 8/21/11 at 1:53pm
post #166 of 166
Thread Starter 

It probably would actually. I think I find the reaction to that sequence distasteful and as such I find the scene itself distasteful. It's a sequence trying to reinforce the sheer, inexplicable, horror of wars. But it seems to have inspired people, to make people think it's badass and it sort of makes my skin-crawl. I'm a pacifist by nature and as such I tend to shy away from war films in general, so maybe I've got a skewed view.

New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:
  Return Home
  Back to Forum: Films in Release or On Video
CHUD.com Community › Forums › SPECIFIC FILMS › Films in Release or On Video › Saving Private Ryan