CHUD.com Community › Forums › CREATURE CORNER › Creature Corner Main › Village of the Damned (1960)
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:

Village of the Damned (1960)

post #1 of 11
Thread Starter 
Things I adore about this movie:

1. They don't ever insult the audience's intelligence by trying to make whether or not the children are normal a mystery. Even before they're born, it's obvious, to the audience AND the characters, that these are freaky space children. It trades a lot of boring stock "I know it sounds far-fetched but I'M TELLING THE TRUTH, THEY'RE EVIL!!" moments that these films tend to have for more interesting moral debates that their existence brings up.

2. Connected to number one, is that they never explain the origin of the children. It's assumed that they're alien, but like the explanation given in Night of the Living Dead, this is just a theory and not a complete one. I think modern movies too often have a case of Explain-Everything-and-Every-Motivation-itus, when it's not really important to the film. Hence the big "twist" fad inspired by Shyamalan.

3. Though the violence is never explicit (it's from 1960 after all), they don't spare the nastiness. There's something particularly chilling about the children making people kill themselves, rather than "exploding their minds" with some kind of psychic ray or something. A villager even sets himself on fire. Harsh.

4. A BRICK WALL! This is more appreciation of camp than actual film quality, but the conclusion is so stupid and silly that I actually enjoy it quite a bit. His plan is to think of something else until his bomb goes off. Kind of obvious, but the setting up of A BRICK WALL throughout the film changes it from just bad to hilarious. Also, I think "A BRICK WALL" is one of those phrases that just sounds funny when repeated over and over again.

"Brick wall...brick wall...brick wall...brick wall..."
"You're thinking of...A BRICK WALL!"
*Boom, children dead.*
post #2 of 11
I still need to see this. So these little kids...are they SCARY little?

I did stumble upon the enjoyably awful Christopher Reeve/Kirstie Alley version on TV once.
post #3 of 11
One of the film's strengths is how it never devulges the children's ultimate intent (or if they even have one). They're a threat due to their abilities and their willingness to use those abilities to protect their group, but I never thought of the kids as unusually malevolent (arrogant and aloof certainly). Mostly the kids seem to think of humans as contemptable nuissances to be used or discarded as needed. We're a lower life form to them.

As for the BRICK WALL ending, I actually think it works fine. Yeah, it's a bit obvious, but what else are you going to think of to conceal your murderous thoughts from freaky mind-reading space children? And, of course, only a BRICK WALL could possibly stand up to the psychic barrage. Those little bastards could see right through plaster.
post #4 of 11
Thread Starter 
Quote:
Originally Posted by BrianM View Post
So these little kids...are they SCARY little?
It's not really a "scary" film because, even though I applaud it's unambiguity towards the nature of the children, you never once really feel that the village stands a chance, so there's not a lot of tension. And the "psychic eyes" effect is dated. Where Invasion of the Body Snatchers is a sci-fi/horror that operates on tension (tipping towards the horror aspect of things), this is a sci-fi/horror that operates on ideas (tipping it towards the sci-fi aspect of things), so it's not really a "horror" in many senses of the word.

But there is something inherently creepy about how utterly calm (and Aryan) every child is, and how detached they are from everyone around them, including their parents. This detachment is taken a step further by having all their voices dubbed (I believe), which was distracting at first but ended up being pretty effective. I like that the film portrays them as detached rather than evil. Cuz even though they aren't going to "scare" you, in any sense, it helps keep the scenes where they force people to kill themselves shocking, because there's no camp to them at all.

All in all, it's an effective sci-fi movie that raises interesting questions about power and identity (there's something to completely independent children being able to manipulate adults minds instead of the other way around).

And, of course, A BRICK WALL!
post #5 of 11
I think I'll have to see this.
Keeping it mysterious certainly sounds faithful to the orginal novel (Midwich Cuckoos, if you didn't know).
post #6 of 11
Thread Starter 
Quote:
Originally Posted by Richason View Post
As for the BRICK WALL ending, I actually think it works fine. Yeah, it's a bit obvious, but what else are you going to think of to conceal your murderous thoughts from freaky mind-reading space children? And, of course, only a BRICK WALL could possibly stand up to the psychic barrage. Those little bastards could see right through plaster.
I don't like it because it's the most obvious answer and it takes him most of the film to figure it out. It only took Peter Venkman 5 seconds to realise that, if one can read your mind and use it against you, you gotta clear your mind.
post #7 of 11
Quote:
Originally Posted by Patrick Ripoll View Post
I don't like it because it's the most obvious answer and it takes him most of the film to figure it out. It only took Peter Venkman 5 seconds to realise that, if one can read your mind and use it against you, you gotta clear your mind.
True, but isn't the hero uncertain of the need to destroy the kids until the very end? It's been awhile since I watched it, but I seem to remember him debating whether the threat poised by the kids justifies killing them. This theme really gets expanded upon in Children of the Damned - the quasi sequel/remake from a few years later.

And I think it's obvious that the hero in Village of the Damned is no Peter Venkman. But then again, that's a damn high standard.
post #8 of 11
Thread Starter 
He does struggle with his feelings towards the children, so I'm sure that factors into why it wasn't immediately considered, but in the end, why a brick wall? Why not a steel wall? Or a puppy, for that matter? All he has to do is distract them long enough for the bomb to go off, the "brick wall" method just seems excessively silly and literal for a movie that, for the most part, steers away from the silly and the literal. It doesn't fit the rest of the film up to that point.

I was thinking that the Army should have planted a bomb in the doctor's bag without him knowing as a possible ending. That'd be suitably bleak, and wouldn't require me to giggle like a mad man.
post #9 of 11
It would have been better if there were mental images of a puppy getting torn to pieces as they broke his defenses.
As I recall, the sequel is more of a sci-fi piece. It explains why the kids are like this and it has something to do with space aliens or some shit. It's been awhile.
post #10 of 11
I love the BRICK WALL, especially the image of it starting to crumble under the children's psychic barrage.

George Sanders was famous for being one of those 'acting is a silly job' actors, but he's wonderfully subdued here, and the relationship between he and his wife is unusual and affecting.
post #11 of 11
Quote:
Originally Posted by Hammerhead View Post
George Sanders was famous for being one of those 'acting is a silly job' actors, but he's wonderfully subdued here, and the relationship between he and his wife is unusual and affecting.
That's another bit that I like. He and his wife are so far apart in age that having children hasn't been an option. Makes their reluctance to accept the "otherness" of their immaculately conceived child all the more plausible and painful.
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:
  Return Home
  Back to Forum: Creature Corner Main
CHUD.com Community › Forums › CREATURE CORNER › Creature Corner Main › Village of the Damned (1960)