CHUD.com Community › Forums › THE CHEWERS › The Chewers Catch-All › The Drew S Situation
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:

The Drew S Situation - Page 2

post #51 of 95
Quote:
Originally Posted by InTheShadows View Post
There's really not many Cultslop guys to be doing that much damage...

Hmmm....some of those names sound familiar.

I do have a feeling Drew is One of these guys, though. Now that I've read it.
Yeah, Drew S is none of those guys.
post #52 of 95
Thread Starter 
Yeah, I'm pretty sure Drew S is none of those guys. They're just wreaking 'havok' on the comments section. It's funny that they friend me on Facebook or add me on Xbox Live and then talk shit on me there. Endlessly bizarre.
post #53 of 95
Endlessly high school.
post #54 of 95
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ahoatam View Post
The cultslop guys aren't doing anything to your talkbacks. Don't flatter yourself.
Hilarious.
post #55 of 95
Quote:
Originally Posted by devincf View Post
Yes, 79 pages of making fun of this site and me is not giving enough of a shit.
And pudding. Delicious pudding.
post #56 of 95
Quote:
Originally Posted by BobClark View Post
How many times has Butter Tits mocked Dickson for being a "carny" or Diva for being shallow? He's hardly one for advancing debate if he just feels like being mean. So let him take his buttery lumps like a man.
And [/thread]
post #57 of 95
Reggie-Wanker, Joeypants, Thank You for defending me.

Litmus Configuration, Thank You for clearing up your position about me.
post #58 of 95
It's really not any of us trolling the comments sections. We just have a stupid thread where we talk shit and make dumb jokes about pudding, that's all. I mean seriously, there's a lot of jokes about pudding in that thread.
post #59 of 95
Shut up, Tim.
post #60 of 95
This guy is still around?
post #61 of 95
Quote:
Originally Posted by Brad Millette View Post
It's really not any of us trolling the comments sections. We just have a stupid thread where we talk shit and make dumb jokes about pudding, that's all. I mean seriously, there's a lot of jokes about pudding in that thread.
What he said. Nobody on Cultslop trolls the comments. Period.

And seriously Devin, when did you get such a thin skin? Considering you seem to have no problem randomly trolling ( por ejemplo) this board yourself , your bitterness towards getting called names is laden with a bit too much hypocrisy to be taken seriously.
post #62 of 95
We keep all of our CHUD/Butter Tits bashing in the designated thread linked earlier here.
I'd also like to clarify for the record that I am not leaving any comments no matter how many times you see the name BobClark on the talkbacks. That's actually Moltisanti. He wants to be me so bad.
post #63 of 95
Wha? I...never, would I never...what...I...don't do that. Trace my IP address. Trace it. Trace it good.
post #64 of 95
I'd post that beating a dead horse photo, but that shit's more tired than Devin stirring the pot on all this "Chewers vs. ButterTits" nonsense.
post #65 of 95
Quote:
Originally Posted by Renn Brown View Post
Hilarious.
Why?
post #66 of 95
Why the fuck are people still railing on Devin, though? I mean, yeesh, obsessed much?
post #67 of 95
Quote:
Originally Posted by Richard Dickson View Post
And [/thread]
Keep angrily beating away at the keyboard with your tiny hands, carny!
post #68 of 95
Quote:
Originally Posted by jack_rabbit View Post
Why the fuck are people still railing on Devin, though? I mean, yeesh, obsessed much?
Devin starts to get a tad antsy when people AREN'T doing this.
post #69 of 95
Thread Starter 
Quote:
Originally Posted by Death Surge View Post
What he said. Nobody on Cultslop trolls the comments. Period.

And seriously Devin, when did you get such a thin skin? Considering you seem to have no problem randomly trolling ( por ejemplo) this board yourself , your bitterness towards getting called names is laden with a bit too much hypocrisy to be taken seriously.
I'm not thin skinned. I'm not sitting here weeping. But that doesn't mean that I'm willing to tolerate people who are just looking to start shit or who just want to smack talk me.

BTW, I like it when trolls justify their behavior by linking to shit I've said or done. I don't remember when you were promised fairness. And I think you get a lot more fairness than you should otherwise expect.
post #70 of 95
Not thin skinned? You're the one who started an entire useless thread about a SITUATION which nobody but you particularly cares about. Some chewer called you names? Shit, we got a situation! Let's start a thread and see if we can brainstorm a reason for Nick to ban this guy!

And nobody's asking for "fairness" (whatever that means). We're just stating the obvious- When you behave like a dick you're bound to attract a few insulting chewers. I think that's about the beginning, middle and end of Drew's "story."
post #71 of 95
Thread Starter 
I don't need a reason to get Nick to ban the guy. The guy gave enough reason. I started this thread in the hopes of getting him to entertainingly melt down. I was thinking of you guys.

Oh, and this guy's story is not just that. He has probably 1k regular posts and in the last couple of weeks seems to have entered meltdown territory.
post #72 of 95
Gotta be Fabfunk then. He's like Agent Smith.
post #73 of 95
Quote:
Originally Posted by devincf View Post
I started this thread in the hopes of getting him to entertainingly melt down. I was thinking of you guys.
I'm still holding out hope that this will happen.
post #74 of 95
Quote:
Originally Posted by devincf View Post
I'm not thin skinned. I'm not sitting here weeping. But that doesn't mean that I'm willing to tolerate people who are just looking to start shit or who just want to smack talk me.

BTW, I like it when trolls justify their behavior by linking to shit I've said or done. I don't remember when you were promised fairness. And I think you get a lot more fairness than you should otherwise expect.


That whole "People Digging up old posts" line is really wearing thin. My example is just over a month old and readily available since it involved me directly. And as it occurred without any provocation or previous on-topic banter, it's a solid example of the point I was making on the hypocrisy of you starting a thread about people insulting you out of nowhere.

And help me out here. How exactly is it that I'm a troll? I'm certainly a lot of things (chauvinistic, egotistical, a lousy ice skater ) but a juvenile anonymous commenter amused by insulting your girth isn't one of them. That accusation is even more ridiculous considering that, historically speaking, it's been proven time and again that If I'm going to insult you, I'm not shy about doing it right here on the board. And were you to page through all of my posts here this year. I'd wager there's a higher pecentage of on-topic, about film, posts than you could say yourself.

And you really should venture into CC more often without trolling, as that's where some of the best posters and conversations here tend to meet up.
post #75 of 95
Thread Starter 
Please. I read your other board. To call that post without provocation is ludicrous.
post #76 of 95
Amazing, I know i've not been around these boards much, but starting a forum on another website about ANOTHER websites forum is just weird.. sounds like some of those people just need to turn off the computer and just walk away for a week.
post #77 of 95
Quote:
Originally Posted by devincf View Post
Please. I read your other board. To call that post without provocation is ludicrous.
So what? They never promised you fairness.
post #78 of 95
Drew S., PLEASE show yourself...
post #79 of 95
He's pulling the Moltisanti Unresponse. A classic move.
post #80 of 95
These baiting threads never work.
post #81 of 95
It's message board jujitsu, particularly effective in this case because Drew S. is in fact a pretty big twat, and his showing up would only shore up sympathy for Devin.
post #82 of 95
A man's got to know his limitations.
post #83 of 95
Quote:
Originally Posted by Schwartz View Post
... and his showing up would only shore up sympathy for Devin.
Shoring up sympathy for Devin is practically impossible.
post #84 of 95
Quote:
Originally Posted by MoonBaseNick View Post
Amazing, I know i've not been around these boards much, but starting a forum on another website about ANOTHER websites forum is just weird.. sounds like some of those people just need to turn off the computer and just walk away for a week.
You should have seen the internet wars some people tried to start after the Dark Knight editorials.
Then there was the scorched planet business.
Nothing new, here.
post #85 of 95
Quote:
Originally Posted by devincf View Post
Please. I read your other board. To call that post without provocation is ludicrous.
You've developed poor reading skills then. Outside of your various message board hypocrisies, which I've also done here, and making fun of your fabfunkian "taking my football and going home" no posting tanturm, any bad mouthing I've done has been directed at your editorial/critical analysis. I've got similar posts about Harry at AICN, Richard Roeper and a few other critics as well (on a message board about film...go figure). I won't deny that there's been some personal insults directed your way here and there, but I'm reasonably sure none of them were made by me.

And the fact that you lurk in that board's threads, retailiate childishly here, and then call out others for being trolls has overloaded my irony sensors for the week.
post #86 of 95
Can't we just get back to talking about how gay sandals are on a grown man, and how cell phone clips are for man-children? All of this serious talk is ruining my mood.
post #87 of 95
Quote:
Originally Posted by Phil View Post
He's pulling the Moltisanti Unresponse. A classic move.
That made me chuckle.
post #88 of 95
Quote:
Originally Posted by devincf View Post
Yeah, I'm pretty sure Drew S is none of those guys. They're just wreaking 'havok' on the comments section. It's funny that they friend me on Facebook or add me on Xbox Live and then talk shit on me there. Endlessly bizarre.
The devincf is such a public persona I wonder why you use it in other Internet activities.
post #89 of 95
Quote:
Originally Posted by B_MetalSucks View Post
Can't we just get back to talking about how gay sandals are on a grown man, and how cell phone clips are for man-children? All of this serious talk is ruining my mood.
hay I like me Sandals
post #90 of 95
Thread Starter 
This guy is off his meds again.
post #91 of 95
When you said you weren't even talking about him after he exploded I started cracking up a little.
post #92 of 95
Years ago, I started a rather creepy thread about women going out half naked, and bitching about men hitting on them. Not my finest hour I agree.

Brad called me out posting about how I was saying women wanna get raped and shit. He brought it up as recently as last month on the other board.

2-28-2009 11:12am:

The worst is still Barkatthemoon, because he had this just genuinely awful streak of posts that were so creepily negative towards women, bordering very close to seriously saying that when a lady wears a tank top, she wants to be raped.

I'm infamous I guess.
post #93 of 95
Dammit I missed this thread. I posted about him in the Troll thread.

Faggot.
post #94 of 95
This took a decidedly dark turn.
post #95 of 95
Damn it...I always miss the good stuff. Stupid real life and responsibilities.
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:
  Return Home
  Back to Forum: The Chewers Catch-All
CHUD.com Community › Forums › THE CHEWERS › The Chewers Catch-All › The Drew S Situation