Quote:
Originally Posted by dreary louse 
'Queen of England' is just a time-worn phrase.
|
I know but not strictly accurate since Elizabeth the 1st 400 years ago, not a big deal but I just wanted to make it clear that she's Queen of lots of places not just England.
Quote:
Originally Posted by dreary louse 
I remember learning in school how the governor general was in little more than a ceremonial position, that our connection to the commonwealth wasn't likely to affect our affairs, but alas.
|
Being queen is just a ceremonial position, it doesn't affect british political affairs let alone commonwealth affairs.
Quote:
Originally Posted by dreary louse 
Surely you don't believe a bloodline of humans has superior genetics?
|
Well of course not - but (AND THIS IS A BIG BUT) I do genuinely believe that the position of figurehead of the nation(s) should not be some power hungry, jumped up little shit lawyer or accountant. I've never seen a politician who was worth more than a fart or who genuinely put the country's welfare ahead of their own. Kings and queens used to die for their country in battle, no politician has done that to my knowledge.
The head of state, be it queen, or president or whatever spends most of their time visiting or entertaining other heads of state, talking to the press, opening schools & hospitals, making stirring 'yes we can' speeches and doing that sort of stuff. Asking them to run the country too is a bit much. Why not have someone who can do this shit; Someone who is basically taught from birth where all the countries are, who their heads of state are, all the protocol and waving to the people bullshit and leave running the country to those who are qualified. Better than having some fucking pea brain puppet who couldn't find their own country (or ass) on a map of the world. If you want to call them king or queen so fucking what, it's just a word.
(Cue outrageous point-missing from ElCapitan) And before any Americans start on about how it's bullshit to pass on the title through blood, i would remind them that 2 sets of presidents have been father and son. Co-incidence? Bollocks.
Quote:
Originally Posted by dreary louse 
It's like this is the nineteenth fucking century or something old...and the solution, as mr adam pointed out, wouldn't exactly result in a foreign occupying force.
I can see the headlines now: Queen Elizabeth has arthritis! And presto, a Canadian republic is born.
|
If it aint broke don't fix it, this system has worked largely without a problem for 500 years or so (cromwell be damned) - the US system failed
horrifically in 2000, so if the US system goes without a flaw for the next 500 years, I'll consider it an option.
Also I would have thought that if Canada became a republic nary a tear would be shed in the UK, indeed most Brits are unaware of Canada's status. I would also have thought the queen would write a polite letter congratulating the country's new leader.