CHUD.com Community › Forums › SPECIFIC FILMS › Films in Release or On Video › The Funhouse (1981)
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:

The Funhouse (1981)

post #1 of 11
Thread Starter 
Atmosphere is the word. The opening credits are damn creepy, as is the rest of the flick. The monster is one ugly thing, and the guy that did the performance really did a great job. So did Kevin Conway as the barker. Gotta give kudos to the score as well. It's a good old fashioned horror score. The fact that the movie isn't drenched in gore much like most of the other horror flicks of the same year proves that all it needed was the creepy visuals and atmosphere to work.

Tobe Hooper crafted a great underrated flick with this one.
post #2 of 11
Eh, he kind of had to win me back after that INCREDIBLY underage looking girl is taking a shower. Eesh.
post #3 of 11
I saw this on Halloween a few years back and I liked it also. I have to admit that it seemed to lose something after the Frankenstein mask was removed. The monster should have worn that thing for 3/4 of the film and then revealed itself. The ventilation fan kill scene is creepy also. So is the final battle with the creature and those gears.

When I hit "info" on my Directv it said the film was about a "maniac in a Frankenstein mask at a carnival" so I think the reviewer only watched the first 10 minutes of the film!
post #4 of 11
Quote:
Originally Posted by Phil View Post
Eh, he kind of had to win me back after that INCREDIBLY underage looking girl is taking a shower. Eesh.
I have no memory of that scene so it must have been completely edited out for TV.
post #5 of 11
Elizabeth Berridge's tits are great. Just had to get that out of the way. THE FUNHOUSE is one of my favorite slasher films, and undeniably one of the better ones in the whole of the genre. I remember being a kid and practically jumping out of my skin when the killer took off his Frankenstein mask. The makeup design has virtually no place in reality as it looks almost wholly demonic instead of deformed, but it's effective, unique, and despite the creature's gruesome features and actions, it manages to engender sympathy via Wayne Doba's performance (not sure if his being a mime really made a hell of a whole lot of difference, but it certainly didn't hurt).

Aside from Wayne Doba and Berridge's tits, Kevin Conway is the MVP here, flawlessly taking on the gimmick of playing three different roles as Conrad Straker, the monster's father, the strip show barker, and the freakshow barker. Having a talent like his in front of the camera is one of the many things that sets THE FUNHOUSE apart from many of the countless films from that same era.

Do you know what truly sucks about THE FUNHOUSE? Dean Koontz's novelization. One of the most abysmal hamfisted pieces of shit I've ever read. 200 or so pages of wanky, backstory bullshit followed by maybe 50-70 pages that follow the narrative of the film. According to Koontz, he was trying to "improve upon" what he felt was poor material by giving it depth and history. What he actually ended up doing was binding instead of rolling 200 + rough sheets of toilet paper.
post #6 of 11
Yes indeed. Beth Berridge's tits are worth a mention. She went to high school with my oldest sister, and frequently babysat me when I was a lad.

EDIT: Speaking of Kevin Conroy... I had the opportunity to watch "Looking For Richard" last night. Fun in spots, an ok movie... but Kevin Conroy was talking to an interviewer about an actor's performance and improvisation skills. He gave the following explanation which I paraphrase here.

"Say something normally... like "You! Go get me that thing and bring it here.", but to do it in Shakespeare's realm is different. "Be Mercury. Set feathers to thy heels and fly like thought from them to me again."

It wasn't so much the words he spoke, but the transformation in him when he spoke them.

An exceptional and very underrated actor. Pity he did not take the role of Theoden in LOTR. He might have made it a bit more watchable.
post #7 of 11
This is another nostalgic favorite of mine. I love the atmosphere of isolation Hooper creates. It's probably the only thing this has in common with TCM.
The final shot is great.
post #8 of 11
Quote:
Originally Posted by BobClark View Post
This is another nostalgic favorite of mine. I love the atmosphere of isolation Hooper creates. It's probably the only thing this has in common with TCM.
The final shot is great.
I would say the other thing it has in common with TCM is a conflicted but ultimately sadistic father / father figure, Conway's Conrad Straker for Jim Siedow's "Old Man". Straker is more protective and less unbalanced, but both he and the "Old Man" show equal measures of resenment and disgust towards their progeny and the shit that they "have to do" to care for them.
post #9 of 11
I don't mean to knit-pick, but I thought of a scene I hate. It is when the little kid is standing near the funhouse and the creature just kind of grabs for him. FAKE! I know it is a small thing, but it bugged me...
post #10 of 11

Like Rene said, atmosphere is the word.  And like Phil noted, Berridge looks insanely young at the beginning. Like creepily so, like I checked Wikipedia to find out she was exactly 18 when she filmed it creepy.

 

The opening, aside from said jailbait, is kind of goofy in just how much it references both Giallo and the Halloween film and I guess the Psycho movie. I’ve never thought of Hooper as some who was particularly affectionate towards other horror movies so I was surprised at how many references and nods he stuffs into those first five minutes.

 

I also love the tone of the set-up. There’s a transgressive element to the Carnival which Hooper milks for all it’s worth and it creates a real sense of unease. I also kind of like the four main kids, you can tell that Hooper doesn’t particularly care for them but they’re far better drawn than most kids if horror movies and they actually have distinct personalities and dynamics.

 

I think the film is a little slack in the middle and the third act is a little scattershot, but it’s a really fun effective piece and I kind of love how the actual attacks are established and shot. There's something really visceral about Richie getting strung up, largely due to the sound work and the fact all you can really see is his flailing legs.

 

 

post #11 of 11

Its a film that made an impression on me as a youngster but I watched it a few years ago and it didn't hold up well at all.

 

Hooper is lucky he continued to work in horror as long as he did.

New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:
  Return Home
  Back to Forum: Films in Release or On Video
CHUD.com Community › Forums › SPECIFIC FILMS › Films in Release or On Video › The Funhouse (1981)