Quote:
Originally Posted by Cylon Baby 
Arnold's been saying this for years. How is this news now?
The GOP would not support him because he is Liberal on Social issues.
|
This is true. One of the main reasons Giuliani couldn't gain traction for his presidential bid was the fact that he couldn't make an effective case to the powerful socially conservative wing of the party. Even McCain couldn't drum up that much excitement with the base until he picked someone with solid conservative bona fides as his running mate. Someone like Arnold would have little chance to win over the social conservatives.
Quote:
| The other day I picked up the latest American Spectator, a rag that claims to be the intellectual standard bearer for the Right. They had a "forum" where various right wingers opined on the future of the GOP. Almost every one of them touted Sarah Palin as the future of the party. Pathetic. |
I think the two intellectual standard bearers for the Right are the National Review and the Weekly Standard (more of a neoconservative agenda). The American Spectator, I think, has been viewed as a bit of a joke for the better part of a decade. While Palin has a handful of advocates among conservative intellectuals (many of whom rightly point out her natural ability to connect with and inspire conservative voters), most of the conservative intellectuals I've been reading are looking towards established or emerging Republicans with ideas, intelligence and some record of accomplishment to go with their strong conservative ideals. People like Mitt Romney and Newt Gingrich from the older generation and Bobby Jindal and Eric Cantor from the younger generation. Besides, barring a monumentally disastrous first 3 years for the Obama Administration, the 2012 Republican nominee will be a sacrificial lamb anyway.