CHUD.com Community › Forums › POLITICS & RELIGION › Political Discourse › Israel's 'measured' response to Hamas...
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:

Israel's 'measured' response to Hamas... - Page 2

post #51 of 191
Thread Starter 
Meanwhile...

Quote:
ISRAELI Defence Minister Ehud Barak says Israel is in an "all-out war against Hamas" as the Jewish state continues its massive bombardment of the Islamist movement's installations in Gaza.

"We have nothing against Gaza residents, but we are engaged in an all-out war against Hamas and its proxies," Mr Barak said yesterday.

"This operation will expand and deepen as much as needed," he said. "We went to war to deal a heavy blow to Hamas, to change the situation in the south.

"We will avoid as much as possible hitting civilians while the people of Hamas and other terrorists deliberately hide and operate within the civilian population."
So, they had to destroy the village in order to save it then...
post #52 of 191
Quote:
Originally Posted by The Rain Dog View Post
Meanwhile...

So, they had to destroy the village in order to save it then...
Doesn't seem like their main goal is to "save" it. Seems like they've declared war. A sad state of affairs on all fronts.
post #53 of 191
Thread Starter 
I love the doublespeak of trying to draw some distinction between Hamas and the Palastinians, as if they're not all cramped into one tiny corner of the world, as if they can target Hamas and not kill Palastinian civilians, as if Hamas are something other than Palastinian.
post #54 of 191
Quote:
Originally Posted by The Rain Dog View Post
I love the doublespeak of trying to draw some distinction between Hamas and the Palastinians, as if they're not all cramped into one tiny corner of the world, as if they can target Hamas and not kill Palastinian civilians, as if Hamas are something other than Palastinian.
..... Are you saying that all Palestinians are part of the Hamas infrastructure? Because that makes no sense. Not every single Palestinian and every single building in Gaza is affiliated with Hamas.
post #55 of 191
No, he is obviously not saying that. And I doubt you actually believe he is saying that.
post #56 of 191
Quote:
Originally Posted by Overlord View Post
..... Are you saying that all Palestinians are part of the Hamas infrastructure? Because that makes no sense. Not every single Palestinian and every single building in Gaza is affiliated with Hamas.
No, but Hamas is embedded within Palestinian civilian centres. That's the insidious thing about terrorists: they use innocents as shields, then blame their victims when they fight backl.
post #57 of 191
Quote:
Originally Posted by Francis Wolcott View Post
No, he is obviously not saying that. And I doubt you actually believe he is saying that.
Well, let's take a look at what he said:

"I love the doublespeak of trying to draw some distinction between Hamas and the Palestinians ... as if Hamas are something other than Palestinian."

Well, that statement is not true. There is a distinction between Hamas and the Palestinian populace at large: not all Palestinians are part of Hamas. Hamas is a particular entity that does not encompass the whole of the surrounding territory/population. True, it's pretty tough to target Hamas without damaging nearby, non-Hamas affiliated civilian targets, but not every part of Gaza is affiliated with Hamas.

Quote:
No, but Hamas is embedded within Palestinian civilian centres. That's the insidious thing about terrorists: they use innocents as shields, then blame their victims when they fight backl.
I can see why they use it as a tactic (they'd be annhilated otherwise), but the blowback result is always sickening. I wonder if Hamas was offered a completely separate state in Gaza, with no conditions attached, whether that would satisfy them (or heck, if not the extremists, just about everyone else living there). I do not see how continued repression is ever going to work.
post #58 of 191
Not every member of Hamas is a rocket-carrying terrorist and that is a distinction a lot of people aren't making, even though there should be some discussion over whether all of Hamas should be considered a terrorist organization or only its militant armed wings. Saying "destroy Hamas" is not like killing every Al-Qaeda operative. That is why the conflict is messy.
Hamas has a political wing, which, unsurprisingly, won considerable power in the last elections. It's not unreasonable, if Palestine is supposed to play the "democracy game", to consider, at least from Arab world perspective, that an attack against all of Hamas is an attack against the Palestinian government and the Palestinian people. It would be considered so if any country outside of that area decided to exterminate a political party from a different country. You might want to argue the legitimacy of Hamas as a political party, but that would, in fact, be doublespeak.
post #59 of 191
Quote:
Originally Posted by Cylon Baby View Post
No, but Hamas is embedded within Palestinian civilian centres. That's the insidious thing about terrorists: they use innocents as shields, then blame their victims when they fight backl.
How morally corrupt and downright rotten do you have to be to bomb a whole appartment building filled with civilians to get to a couple of terrorists?
post #60 of 191
Quote:
Originally Posted by The Rain Dog View Post
Um no. Even tho individual incursions can be cited even earlier, the first 'official' invasion of Ireland was by the Normans at the behest of King Henry the Second in 1171 with the approval of the Pope in Rome. This ended the line of Irish High Kings and signalled 800 years of English dominance in Eire.

...if we want to get technical about it.
but Cromwell brought the protestant Scots in to oversee the island.
post #61 of 191
Thread Starter 
He did but without the previous historical context of England having already having had it's boot on Irelands neck for almost 500 years that couldn't have happened.
post #62 of 191
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mr.Crowley View Post
How morally corrupt and downright rotten do you have to be to bomb a whole appartment building filled with civilians to get to a couple of terrorists?
that the GREAT thing about war the enemy is never human.
post #63 of 191
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mr.Crowley View Post
How morally corrupt and downright rotten do you have to be to bomb a whole appartment building filled with civilians to get to a couple of terrorists?
You realize you could get rid of the "couple of terrorists" portion of that sentence and it would apply to Hamas, right?

Plenty of blame to go around here. Just slather it on the entire region.
post #64 of 191
Except Hamas didn't kill 327 people in the last couple of days.
The Israelis are the ones with the power here, and we should expect better from them.
post #65 of 191
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mr.Crowley View Post
Except Hamas didn't kill 327 people in the last couple of days.

The Israelis are the ones with the power here, and we should expect better from them.
As to your first point: the only thing holding them back is that they lack the capacity. That doesn't place them on a moral high ground.

As to the second: Israel appears to lack the internal will to make concessions that would actually satisfy the Palestinians (and be humanitarian). This is probably due to the constant terrorist acts and rhetoric directed at them.

Until somebody gives ground (perhaps literally) nothing will change.
post #66 of 191
I could give two fucks about anyone in Hamas,of course they have no moral high ground, it's the civilians caught in the crossfire I care about.
If Israel are waiting for the day where there are no terrorists around to scupper rational peace-talks, they'll be waiting forever. How many new terrorists with nothing to lose have the last day's actions created?
post #67 of 191
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mr.Crowley View Post
If Israel are waiting for the day where there are no terrorists around to scupper rational peace-talks, they'll be waiting forever. How many new terrorists with nothing to lose have the last day's actions created?
This is what Israel never appears to understand. You can come up with justification/flimsy excuse after justification/flimsy excuse for Israel's retaliatory/oppressive strikes, but they have been proven utterly ineffective.

Palestinians are going to need their own state, and one that isn't crushed under another's heel. Will this happen in our lifetimes? Well, it's seeming less likely.

How are things in the West Bank? Still fairly quiet? Settlers still creeping in? I actually find reading about the situation utterly depressing.
post #68 of 191
And I never got those who think that it's okay for a sovereign state, one that's supposed to be a western republic, to act like a terrorist group.

The bottom line is that Israel is once again using disproportionate power and killing indiscriminately. The fact that they initially responded to a provocation is inconsequential.

The lessons learned are:

a. Israeli politicians have no desire to reach a peace settlement.
b. The lives of several hundred Palestinians means nothing to them if their death will boost their election chances.
c. They learned nothing from Lebanon.
d. When Milosevic did it, he was Hitler reincarnate. When Israel does it, it's exercising its right to defend itself.
e. Apartheid is alive and well. The Palestinians will be allowed to have bantustans and nothing more. They will cross a wall in the morning, perform menial labour and promptly return to their territories at sundown. If they vote for someone who's not playing ball, there will be no attempt to strike a deal. Instead, they will be blockaded and ultimately pounded into submission.
post #69 of 191
Thread Starter 
Quote:
Originally Posted by mastronikolas View Post
And I never got those who think that it's okay for a sovereign state, one that's supposed to be a western republic, to act like a terrorist group.
Well apparently, when a sovereign nation does it, it isn't terrorism.

See: Russia in Chechnya, the US in Latin America, Indonesia in East Timor, Aceh and West Papua, China in Tibet and on and on and on....
post #70 of 191
Quote:
Originally Posted by The Rain Dog View Post
Well apparently, when a sovereign nation does it, it isn't terrorism.

Well, if the last six years have taught us nothing, it's that might makes right. If some idiot sniper in your apartment building takes potshots at me, I have the inalienable right to destroy your entire building and all its innocent occupants.
post #71 of 191
Thread Starter 
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jacob Singer View Post
Well, if the last six years have taught us nothing, it's that might makes right. If some idiot sniper in your apartment building takes potshots at me, I have the inalienable right to destroy your entire building and all its innocent occupants.
As long as you have the backing of the right powerful friends you do apparently.
post #72 of 191
post #73 of 191
Thread Starter 
Yes but WHICH juice?

I say destroy all orange juice personally, but thats cause I find it too acidic.

Leave apple juice alone tho - that shits all I live off besides water and wine.
post #74 of 191
I'd say spare cranberry and jihad to the rest.
post #75 of 191
Cranberry is an abomination before God's eyes you infidel.
I hit you with the sole of my left shoe.
post #76 of 191
Thread Starter 
Quite right El Cap, have you not heard of The Protocals Of The Elders of Ocean Spray Francis?
post #77 of 191
Damn, was there not some provision for jihadists that they can indulge in things forbidden by Allah if its to pass as normal? Because obviously that's why I pretend to enjoy cranberry juice...
post #78 of 191
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mr.Crowley View Post
Except Hamas didn't kill 327 people in the last couple of days.
The Israelis are the ones with the power here, and we should expect better from them.
Tell me, how many of those were civilians?
post #79 of 191
Quote:
Originally Posted by JuddL View Post
Tell me, how many of those were civilians?
Two. Does this make it ok that these two died? Is it somehow their fault?

What if they were a hundred civilians dead. Is it enough to make you upset? How much collateral damage is justified for every dead suspected Hamas member?

If you supported the other side, how many Israeli civilians dead would you feel ok with for every military target attacked?
post #80 of 191
Quote:
Originally Posted by JuddL View Post
Tell me, how many of those were civilians?
No, I think the Israeli government should tell us how many of those were confirmed terrorists.
I'd be amazed if even 10% of those had anything to do with Hamas. There is no such thing (if there ever were) like a surgical strike in one of the most crowded cities in the world.
post #81 of 191
Quote:
Originally Posted by JuddL View Post
Tell me, how many of those were civilians?
According to UN estimates, at least 57 were civilians. 21 of them children and seven women.
post #82 of 191
Thread Starter 
Tell me Judd, how many terrorists were on THIS boat exactly?????

Quote:
The Israeli navy has rammed a boat loaded with medical supplies that was trying to break its blockade of the Gaza Strip, the pro-Palestinian charity operating the vessel says.

No one was injured in the collision between the patrol boat and the 20-metre Dignity, which was trying to take three tonnes of medical supplies into Gaza on day four of Israeli air strikes on the Palestinian territory.

Israeli army radio said the boat -- operated by the Free Gaza Movement -- ignored both orders to turn around and warning shots across its bow before it was rammed on Tuesday.

The Free Gaza Movement, which has ran the blockade six times since August to take humanitarian supplies into Gaza, said the vessel could still sail after the ramming.

Paul Laurdee, one of the group's founders, told AFP the Dignity had been "surrounded" in international waters about 70km off the Israeli coast and 135km from Gaza.

"It was surrounded by 11 Israeli naval vessels," he said.

"They ordered the boat to stop, and we didn't. They began firing over our boat and into the waters next to the boat. When the boat wouldn't turn back, one of the naval vessels rammed the boat, but not enough to disable the boat."
post #83 of 191
Quote:
Originally Posted by The Rain Dog View Post
Tell me Judd, how many terrorists were on THIS boat exactly?????
None, but Cynthia McKinney was on board, so they probably just wanted her to shut the hell up.
post #84 of 191
Quote:
Originally Posted by pervis42 View Post
None, but Cynthia McKinney was on board, so they probably just wanted her to shut the hell up.


Quote:
“Our boat was rammed three times, twice in the front and one on the side,” McKinney told CNN Tuesday morning. “Our mission was a peaceful mission. Our mission was thwarted by the aggressiveness of the Israeli military.”
post #85 of 191
Even the Palestinians would have attacked the boat if they knew McKinney was on it.
post #86 of 191
Quote:
Originally Posted by stelios View Post
Two. Does this make it ok that these two died? Is it somehow their fault?

What if they were a hundred civilians dead. Is it enough to make you upset? How much collateral damage is justified for every dead suspected Hamas member?

If you supported the other side, how many Israeli civilians dead would you feel ok with for every military target attacked?
My point was only that it's a little unfair to throw around the 327 number as if it was indiscriminate. Frankly I'm not sure how many dead civilians would be "acceptable". Morality is funny like that. On small scales perhaps absolutes are common, but when we blow things up there's usually a point at which those smaller scale imperatives collapse (say, murder one to save a million).

Before you peg me as justifying anything I would say in this instance very few if any civilian deaths are justified given that Israel hasn't exhausted its options or taken the necessary steps to avoid these conflicts.
post #87 of 191
post #88 of 191
*poke* *poke* *poke* *poke* *poke* *ROUNDHOUSE PUNCH!!*
post #89 of 191
post #90 of 191
I read somewhere that Fatah is allegedly providing info on Hamas locations to the IDF.
post #91 of 191
Quote:
Originally Posted by nekkerbee View Post
I read somewhere that Fatah is allegedly providing info on Hamas locations to the IDF.
Not surprising considering the animosity Fatah harbors against Hamas especially since the former was embarrassingly forced out of the Gaza region by the latter.
It's a win-win situation for them to do so since they get to see their rivals pounded into the dirt while being somewhat absolved from the deed. And once and if Hamas has been forced out, they can come back in, take control and recruit from those that suffered from the attacks.
"We didn't bomb you, the Israelis did" etc...
post #92 of 191
Fatah and Hamas adhere to fundamentaly different ideologies. Far from being just a power grab on their behalf there's nothing Fatah would like more than seeing Hamas crumble to the ground.
post #93 of 191
Some of you might have seen the video the Israeli defense force posted allover the internet earlier this week. It contained footage of Hamas terrorists loading missiles onto a flatbed truck all the while being filmed by an Israeli plane. At the end of the video the terrorists are obliterated by an Israeli bomb.
Only they might not have been terrorists; "Research from a number of sources, including the Israeli-Palestinian B'Tselem group in Gaza, indicate that the owner of the truck in the Israeli Defense Force bombing was not a Hamas member transporting rockets, but instead a civilian transporting gas welding canisters from his metalworking shop."
Tragic if true.

More at the link.
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/michae..._b_154719.html
post #94 of 191
Quote:
Originally Posted by The Rain Dog View Post
And is that justifiable in your view?

I'm interested Frank, in your opinion, is the onus on one particular side of this conflict to be the ones to take the first steps to try and solve it? How do you see both sides reaching any kind of understanding or rising above their current eye for an eye quagmire? Do you think they will? Do you think they should? Does one side morally deserve to be the 'winner' so to speak at the end of this or do you see both sides being culpable?
Wow, this is a dissertation-level question. Unfortunately, I just don't have time to compose a dissertation-level response, so I'll be brief. I'm going to make some unsourced references to the Law of Armed Conflict here, and I admit (in advance) that they'll be from memory.

What you're really asking, I think, is two questions. The first question is operational: are current Israeli operations defensible? The second is strategic: what's the best road to peace in that stretch of land between Egypt and Turkey (Because, hey, Syria and Jordan are in this as much as anyone else.)?

Regarding the first question, from a straight Law of Armed Conflict perspective, current Israeli operations are defensible. Hamas stated, in advance, that it did not intend to continue the cease-fire when it expired. Hamas followed through on that statement with rocket attacks on Israel, as clear an act of aggression as one could hope to find. That part's ok, actually - that's the kind of thing that hostile nations do. Hamas is in violation of the LOAC, however, when it uses mufti-clad irregulars to fire randomly from among the civilian populace. A further LOAC violation arises from Hamas's insistence on placing its (para)military operators within the civilian populace. These violations free Israel of any LOAC constraints regarding targeting (para)military operators that are embedded within said civilian populace. In other words, the onus is on Hamas to make a reasonable effort to ensure that civilians are out of harm's way, not on Israel to invent personalized munitions that kill only intended targets and none other.

Regarding the second question, I think it will, for the most part, take care of itself in the next seventy-five years. By then, native-born Muslims should comprise a clear majority of the Israeli electorate, and one can expect this majority to elect a pro-Muslim prime minister and parliament. Of course, this group will have its own headaches: by then, the landless Palestinian diaspora will be even larger than it is today, and repatriation will present whole new sets of problems.

You asked a comprehensive question, and this is only a partial answer. For that, I apologize. But my kids need to play with their dad!
post #95 of 191
Hamas now*plans major suicide attacks inside Israel. The group actually warned Muslims who are foreign citizens to leave Israel immediately: http://samsonblinded.org/news/hamas-...ee-israel-5473
post #96 of 191
Quote:
Originally Posted by tranquill View Post
Hamas now*plans major suicide attacks inside Israel. The group actually warned Muslims who are foreign citizens to leave Israel immediately: http://samsonblinded.org/news/hamas-...ee-israel-5473
That site seems really credible.
post #97 of 191
I don't know about that site but I know that our embassy in Jerusalem has already issued a warning to Greek citizens in Israel.

I saw on the news today Livni, the Israeli foreign minister going on about Israel being the front line of the free world's fight against blah blah blah and I had to change the channel before I threw something heavy at the TV. Where did she get the fucking right to present these actions as though they're being done in my name too? Are they actually deluded enough to presume that they have anyone's sympathy in this case?
post #98 of 191
Quote:
Originally Posted by Francis Wolcott View Post
Not every member of Hamas is a rocket-carrying terrorist and that is a distinction a lot of people aren't making, even though there should be some discussion over whether all of Hamas should be considered a terrorist organization or only its militant armed wings.
It's true, a friend of mine visited Syria and found Hamas members selling official T-shirts and keffiyehs as public relations. He wasn't shot!!
post #99 of 191
Quote:
Originally Posted by dreary louse View Post
It's true, a friend of mine visited Syria and found Hamas members selling official T-shirts and keffiyehs as public relations. He wasn't shot!!
This post wins my vote for non sequitur of the day.
post #100 of 191
Israeli ground troops now on the march into Gaza.

http://www.cnn.com/2009/WORLD/meast/...aza/index.html
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:
  Return Home
  Back to Forum: Political Discourse
CHUD.com Community › Forums › POLITICS & RELIGION › Political Discourse › Israel's 'measured' response to Hamas...