CHUD.com Community › Forums › THE CHEWERS › The Chewers Catch-All › Fabfunk Triumphant
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:

Fabfunk Triumphant - Page 3

post #101 of 127
What a total and utter burn.

*rolls eyes*
post #102 of 127
Thread Starter 
Quote:
Originally Posted by The LD View Post
I'm not really able to connect the dots between why I have an obligation to make this place better? It's a resource.
Then why were you complaining about this thread? What does it matter to you? Why are you being a big, trolling shithead in this thread still? You've made more posts here than you have on this board in a month.
post #103 of 127
Quote:
Originally Posted by DaveB View Post
Yeah, when I think of self-absorbed narcissists on the board, he's totally the first to come to mind.
I'm not here to talk about myself. I want to talk about movies. Talking about anything long enough will lead to personal reflections, etc. But putting youself before the content is a standard MO. That's not high-grade narcissism, but it's been a problem, in that it involves more talking at than with, or people whose presence is defined by things that have nothing to do with film, or the arts in general.
post #104 of 127
I think more people should start masturbating in private.
post #105 of 127
Quote:
Originally Posted by The LD View Post
I'm not really able to connect the dots between why I have an obligation to make this place better? It's a resource.
That attitude sort of goes to the point, though, doesn't it? If everyone treats the message board (and the site) like just a resource or a place to crack a few cheap jokes, then it'll die.

This place is mostly user-driven (lord knows the few threads I've started or contributed to about movies aren't enough, but I SWEAR I have Pelham at home and will be watching it this weekend and contributing in the Pelham/Warriors thread immediately thereafter!) and if Dre and DaveB and Phil and Nordling and Molti and Ripoll and Sam Strange decide to stop bringing their own ideas on movies (and B.O. numbers and music and TV and Van Dammage and whatnot) to the table then it becomes any other messageboard and dies a quiet death.
post #106 of 127
Quote:
Originally Posted by BrianM View Post
That attitude sort of goes to the point, though, doesn't it? If everyone treats the message board (and the site) like just a resource or a place to crack a few cheap jokes, then it'll die.
Right, but then we'd all find other resources. The people who are invested in the site have the obligation to make it interesting to the posters you named, so that they'll want to share their thoughts here rather than somewhere else.
post #107 of 127
Thread Starter 
Please find other resources.
post #108 of 127
Quote:
Originally Posted by devincf View Post
Please find other resources.
No, I'm good here. Like you pointed out, I'm a generally unobtrusive presence.
post #109 of 127
This back and forth really does not serve anyone.
post #110 of 127
See what merely invoking the name, "Fabfunk," does to people?

Use the power sparingly, children.
post #111 of 127
Quote:
Originally Posted by The LD View Post
Right, but then we'd all find other resources. The people who are invested in the site have the obligation to make it interesting to the posters you named, so that they'll want to share their thoughts here rather than somewhere else.
You're thinking of this place all wrong. As if CHUD had the interesting content back in a safe. The content's not here. Your content's in DaveB's post about Elvis Costello; that's right next to yours. And in the Ripoll's "Late to the Party" threads, and Dre's box office roundups, and the "Let the Right One In" and "Watchmen" discussions, and a hundred others. Why, Chewers are lending CHUD their ideas to build on, and then, they're going to pay it back to you as best they can. Now what are you going to do? Foreclose on them?...Now wait...now listen...now listen to me. I beg of you not to do this thing. If cheap jokers get hold of this website there'll never be another decent messageboard built in this town. They've already got charge of AICN. They've got the IMDB boards. They've got Rotten Tomatoes. And now they're after us. Why? Well, it's very simple. Because they aren't interested in contributing anything new, that's why. And because they want to keep you living in the internet slums and paying the kind of rent they decide. Justin Clark, you had one of those other messageboard experiences, didn't you? Well, have you forgotten? Have you forgotten what they charged you for that broken-down content? Here, Judas Booth. You know, you remember last year when things weren't going so well, and you were hanging out at IMDB? You didn't lose your way back to CHUD, did you? Do you think the jokers would have let you back in? Can't you understand what's happening here? Don't you see what's happening? They aren't selling. They're buying! And why? Because we're panicking and they're not. That's why. They're picking up some bargain threads. Now, we can get through this thing all right. We've got to stick together, though. We've got to have faith in each other.

ETA/DISCLAIMER: [I'm just throwing the names of Clark and Booth out there for comedic effect because they were on the tip of my tongue, with no intention of slandering either's good name or character - and whether they like it or not, I think LD, LeFors, Banks and co. actually DO bring a lot of personality and content to the boards and I don't mean to imply otherwise!]
post #112 of 127
Quote:
Originally Posted by BrianM View Post
You're thinking of this place all wrong. As if CHUD had the interesting content back in a safe. The content's not here. Your content's in DaveB's post about Elvis Costello; that's right next to yours. And in the Ripoll's "Late to the Party" threads, and Dre's box office roundups, and the "Let the Right One In" and "Watchmen" discussions, and a hundred others. Why, Chewers are lending CHUD their ideas to build on, and then, they're going to pay it back to you as best they can. Now what are you going to do? Foreclose on them?...Now wait...now listen...now listen to me. I beg of you not to do this thing. If cheap jokers get hold of this website there'll never be another decent messageboard built in this town. They've already got charge of AICN. They've got the IMDB boards. They've got Rotten Tomatoes. And now they're after us. Why? Well, it's very simple. Because they aren't interested in contributing anything new, that's why. And because they want to keep you living in the internet slums and paying the kind of rent they decide. Justin Clark, you had one of those other messageboard experiences, didn't you? Well, have you forgotten? Have you forgotten what they charged you for that broken-down content? Here, Judas Booth. You know, you remember last year when things weren't going so well, and you were hanging out at IMDB? You didn't lose your way back to CHUD, did you? Do you think the jokers would have let you back in? Can't you understand what's happening here? Don't you see what's happening? They aren't selling. They're buying! And why? Because we're panicking and they're not. That's why. They're picking up some bargain threads. Now, we can get through this thing all right. We've got to stick together, though. We've got to have faith in each other.
And on that note, I will bow out of the thread. Bravo.
post #113 of 127
I still don't get what the fuck fabfunk was so "triumphant" over. This thread, however, is aids.
post #114 of 127
This thread LITERALLY got to the point of the salem witch trails, people pointing fingers "FABFUNK, FABFUNK!"

This guy left and was buried long ago for a reason.
post #115 of 127
Quote:
Originally Posted by Chris Miller View Post
I still don't get what the fuck fabfunk was so "triumphant" over. This thread, however, is aids.
I believe the thread title "Fabfunk Triumphant" is referring to his username on Rotten Tomatoes.
post #116 of 127
Quote:
Originally Posted by Supremo View Post
I really want to see the short film Fabfunk starred in. According to his Q&A, he "swelled noticably to a surprisingly large weight" before filming. Please tell me this thing's on YouTube.
Behold.
post #117 of 127
Quote:
Originally Posted by BrianM View Post
and whether they like it or not, I think LD, LeFors, Banks and co. actually DO bring a lot of personality and content to the boards and I don't mean to imply otherwise!]
Don't you go lumping me in with those feckless cocksuckers.
post #118 of 127
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ultraman Mac View Post
I believe the thread title "Fabfunk Triumphant" is referring to his username on Rotten Tomatoes.
OOOOOOOOOOOOHHHHHHHHH.

Now it makes sense.
post #119 of 127
Devin said it two pages ago, ya mook.
post #120 of 127
I know, I'm an idiot. My brain didn't process it correctly, I thought he was just reiterating that fabfunk's username was fabfunk on RT, and was still under the impression that devin was sarcastically pointing out Gabe's failure at something by calling him triumphant. I didn't realize O'l fab had actually named himself "Fabfunk Triumphant".
post #121 of 127
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jan View Post

hahhahahahahahahahah hearing him trying to talk someone out of sexual perversity is some kind of awesome.
post #122 of 127
I saw Goody Proctor with Fabfunk!
post #123 of 127
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jan View Post
Damn. He ate one of those Jews. I guarantee it.
post #124 of 127
He's like a deviant version of Groucho Marx.
post #125 of 127

Merely evoke his name and 3 pages of Bile happen!

I propose we call this "The FabFunk Effect!"
post #126 of 127
Damn, that short was bad. He looks like a mix between Eugene Levy and Seth Rogen, and Gabe Toro sounds like a Porn Star name.
post #127 of 127
And he sounds like Woody Allen.
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:
  Return Home
  Back to Forum: The Chewers Catch-All
CHUD.com Community › Forums › THE CHEWERS › The Chewers Catch-All › Fabfunk Triumphant