CHUD.com Community › Forums › SPECIFIC FILMS › The Franchises › Personal Accountability in FELLOWSHIP OF THE RING
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:

Personal Accountability in FELLOWSHIP OF THE RING

post #1 of 4
Thread Starter 
Revisiting THE LORD OF THE RINGS this past Christmas, I was struck by an element in FELLOWSHIP that I'd noticed when the film first came out but I'd not thought about until this past viewing (which was further enhanced by the fact that I'd just re-read the book before watching) -- and that element was the addition of "blame" for some of the major set pieces in the story.

For example, in the book, Aragorn takes the hobbits to Weathertop and openly lights a camp fire, stating that despite being hunted by the Nazgul, fire is their friend, as the wraiths fear it. However, in the film, the tension is upped, and the fact that Sam, Merry and Pippin light a fire is what betrays their location and causes Frodo to suffer a wound that leaves him spiritually crippled. In other words, it's the hobbits' fault for lighting a fire.

Later, as the Fellowship is snowblocked, an alternate route must be determined. In the book, Gandalf argues for the Moria road from the beginning despite Aragorn's protests; in the film, he is quite clearly afraid of waking a slumbering Balrog. Book Gandalf is quite pleased when Frodo agrees with the suggestion of Moria; in the film, he lays the decision wholly on Frodo. Frodo's choice to go through Moria terrifies Gandalf, who is pushing the company desperately through a snowstorm that will kill them all before risking a confrontation with the Balrog. In other words, Gandalf's death is Frodo's fault, because Frodo voted Gandalf down.

Finally, in Moria, Jackson, Walsh and Boyens made the decision to take Pippin's incidental encounter with a well (he drops a stone in the book, resulting in some hammer-tapping) and move it to Balin's tomb. Pippin's carelessness with a dwarf skeleton is what signals the goblins to attack, waking the Balrog in the process, and we all know how THAT goes. So in other words, Gandalf's death is Pippin's fault, because Pippin suffers from hobbit ADD.

Okay, so maybe "fault" is a strong word in these instances, but these situations were definitely heightened for the theatrical presentation of the story, and in the process, and element of choice (direct or indirect) and personal accountability was added. It definitely stood out to me.
post #2 of 4
These don't really seem like examples of personal accountability. They seem more like minor changes to make the film's narrative, which could have become mired in a dull, travelogue-like quality, flow better dramatically.
post #3 of 4
"All you have to decide is what to do with the time that is given to you." We get that line twice. It's not exactly a subtle thing.
post #4 of 4
Listen to the commentaries on the extended edition - Jackson, Boyens and Wlash all say how little changes like that are all about bringing the story back to Frodo at every chance possible.
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:
  Return Home
  Back to Forum: The Franchises
CHUD.com Community › Forums › SPECIFIC FILMS › The Franchises › Personal Accountability in FELLOWSHIP OF THE RING