CHUD.com Community › Forums › POLITICS & RELIGION › Political Discourse › President Obama's Address to the Nation/Congress Feb 24 2009
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:

President Obama's Address to the Nation/Congress Feb 24 2009 - Page 2

post #51 of 126
I'm just seeing this for the first time (I listened to it on NPR earlier) and the moment when Justice Ginsburg came in was pretty moving. I also loved Obama's Beatles-at-Shea-Stadium entrance.
post #52 of 126
Quote:
Originally Posted by pervis42 View Post
I want to hear what David Brooks had to say about Jindal's speech.
To sum up what he said on Charlie Rose afterwards: embarrassing, spectacularly irresponsible, and amazingly out of touch with the reality of the situation.
post #53 of 126
Quote:
Originally Posted by Snaieke View Post
Freezing spending, addressing the $4bn in pork that is attached to the $410bn spending bill (or you know, saying he'll put his foot down and veto it), making a commitment to ensure people who are up for retirement in the next 0-5 years will have government assistance (spending money on everything else, why not) would have gone a long way to wooing me over.
Why on earth would he freeze spending? That's basically the opposite of what every economist not affiliated with the GOP is calling for.
post #54 of 126
Quote:
Originally Posted by Muharulz View Post
Great and all, but why don't we start helping those who are extremely tied down with student loan debt? I'm hovering around 160,000 in debt and while I'm in law school,jobs are awfully hard to come by if you aren't a minority or a rich WASP with connections.

Wow, yet another Angry White Guy who's clueless. Because your statement was the epitome of ignorance, I'm not even going to try to debate you.

But here's a newsflash, Kimosabi: nobody's "handing out" jobs to minorites. We have student loans too. Even though you're in law school, you obviously have a lot to learn about society.

But, hey, I gotta go. Time to spread the word to all my college educated unemployed minority friends and family members and let them know how "easy" jobs are to come by.
post #55 of 126
Quote:
Originally Posted by Cylon Baby View Post
I can't believe Bobby Jindal had the balls to use Hurricane Katrina and the botched Federal response as an example to prove that government can never work.

Katrina is the apotheosis of the Conservative movement in action. Or inaction as the case may be. And this jackass uses this incredible, horrific blunder by the government of his own party to prove his point.
I think he thought he was campaigning for Governor again.

My parents are (were?) big Jindal supporters, and they were totally dumbfounded by this performance. Can't say I blame them. He literally has never sounded anything remotely like that during his tenure in politics here. He's sounded too polished and a little phoney at times, but I've never once heard him come across like he was reading bedtime stories to retarded kittens.

Ah well, just another storied moment in the continuing tragedy that is Louisiana politics.
post #56 of 126
Oh god, Maddow's immediate response to Jindal's speech = PRICELESS.
post #57 of 126
"Disgrace" doesnt even begin to describe that Jindal guy. Amazingly bad. Amazingly stupid.
post #58 of 126
I want to tie Jindal's hands to his sides and see if he can still talk.
post #59 of 126
Quote:
Originally Posted by lordelsey View Post
The market will keep dropping till people that should have never been in it in the first place are out. No investment should grow more then 2-3% a year, realisticlly.

Obama had a good speech. If Jindal is the best the republican party can do, they are in serious trouble.
The S&P over the past 30 years or so has risen at a rate of about 8% per year. Yes, even including the past 15 months. (It may be more or less than 30 years, Ill edit this once I have the exact number, but its around there).

Dividends alone from the stocks within the S&P over the past 10 years have resulted in close to a 40% rate of return provided you had them paid out as opposed to reinvested.

But yeah, it sucks now that all the blue chips have been cutting those like its going out of style.

Quote:
Originally Posted by yt
Whatever you say, Marie Antoinette. ETA:
Ya know Im right ya bastage!


Quote:
Originally Posted by Cyclon Baby
And while I agree this isn't a Great Depression, I do think there will be a major lowering of people life style and spending habits. In the long run I think that is good, but the transition period will be rough.
Dead on, and I think that theres nothing wrong with that, as the past two decades were ridiculous in terms of overall growth. We were sitting on so many bubbles it was unreal. Unfortunately, it seems as if our administrations (both past and current) are looking to do whatever they can to continue propping us up, so to speak.
post #60 of 126
Quote:
Originally Posted by yt View Post
I also loved Obama's Beatles-at-Shea-Stadium entrance.
I guess my major turn off is that I want a president, not a rock star.
post #61 of 126
Quote:
Originally Posted by The Closer View Post
Ya know Im right ya bastage!
Yeeeeeeea... no.

Quote:
Originally Posted by MoonBaseNick View Post
I guess my major turn off is that I want a president, not a rock star.
Apologies to whoever you listen to, watch or read, but this is the dumbest meme I've heard in a long time. Obama has not only done more for the people of this country in one month than Bush did in his entire 8 years, but at a dark time on many fronts, he is giving people hope that there's a way forward.

How do you think people greeted George Washington in his day?
post #62 of 126
Quote:
Originally Posted by yt View Post
Yeeeeeeea... no.
We should create a yt vs Closer thread so you and I can just argue about everything. For instance, I would argue that snow is superior to rain.


Quote:
Apologies to whoever you listen to, watch or read, but this is the dumbest meme I've heard in a long time. Obama has not only done more for the people of this country in one month than Bush did in his entire 8 years, but at a dark time on many fronts, he is giving people hope that there's a way forward.
Like what? Sure people like him more (as do I), but he really hasnt had time to do anything but talk about what hes going to do. Nothing wrong with that, but come on...
Quote:
How do you think people greeted George Washington in his day?
According to an episode of John Adams I watched, people were upset with him about something. Then Paul Giamatti got frustrated and mumbled.
post #63 of 126
Quote:
Originally Posted by yt View Post
Apologies to whoever you listen to, watch or read, but this is the dumbest meme I've heard in a long time. Obama has not only done more for the people of this country in one month than Bush did in his entire 8 years, but at a dark time on many fronts, he is giving people hope that there's a way forward.

How do you think people greeted George Washington in his day?
I'd challenge that notion completely unless you're bringing an ideological spin to that. Bush did plenty for the American people during his eight years, albeit few things actually great.

As for Obama, what has he really done in a month? I'm not one of the Republicans who thinks he should be immediately impeached nor am I one that won't give him a shot, but other than a terrible stimulus package... what has he done? I want concrete evidence, not things he's announced but hasn't happened yet.

Also, the idea of treating a President with so much love and fuzzy feelings is quite dangerous, regardless of party. A President should be respected, but this isn't the Second Coming like many people (not just on the boards, but people in DC and all over) think it is. It's great your guy won, but it's quite sickening to see the fawning over Obama like he's going to magically change everything in America and bring "hope" to everyone.

The Washington comparison is laughable. Washington was a great general and public servant before his election. Obama's achievements prior to office pail in comparison to Washington's. Also, the seeds of distrust existed because of the recent oppression the American colonies had seen under King George III. Even the Federalists had their doubts about the man and the office.
post #64 of 126
I and most people who are supporting Obama are very critical of him, in spite of his willingness to roll up his sleeves and get to work. For example, I'm very critical of the choice of Geithner and think choice may signal ineffectual financial strategies to deal with the banking crisis, and I didn't love the line in Obama's speech about free trade. Believe me, on the left, people don't fall in line. Everyone is cautiously optimistic though.

And please, if you can name one piece of legislation that Bush signed that primarily benefited the people, as opposed to corporations and the very rich, I'll concede at least that.

Obama has done a lot in his first month. He signed S-Chip, health insurance for kids; he ordered the closing of Gitmo and foreign black sites; he pushed and passed the stimulus package, which I know you have been led to believe is a waste but which I think is at least half exactly what the economy needs to start getting back on his feet; he saved property around national parks from being sacrificed at the altar of the oil companies, and on and on. In just last night's speech alone, the power he gave to the push to improve education was a great sign that he will be prioritizing an issue that is close to the top of my list.

The Closer, you don't have to shovel rain out of your driveway every morning!
post #65 of 126
Quote:
Originally Posted by yt View Post
Obama has not only done more for the people of this country in one month than Bush did in his entire 8 years, but at a dark time on many fronts, he is giving people hope that there's a way forward.

How do you think people greeted George Washington in his day?
I think it's too early to say things like that, give it some time I have high expectations for the president but geez, let's not sound cultish about it.

There's really nothing to be too excited about, the economy is really down in the crapper. I'm not going to say he has no answers but every action the government is taking now will need time to see if it even has a dent on our economic situation. At the same time, it's not the right time to be cheering about anything to be quite honest.
post #66 of 126
Quote:
Originally Posted by Muharulz View Post
Bush did plenty to the American people during his eight years
Took care of that for ya.
post #67 of 126
Quote:
Originally Posted by Muharulz View Post
the idea of treating a President with so much love and fuzzy feelings is quite dangerous, regardless of party. A President should be respected, but this isn't the Second Coming like many people (not just on the boards, but people in DC and all over) think it is. It's great your guy won, but it's quite sickening to see the fawning over Obama like he's going to magically change everything in America and bring "hope" to everyone.
That was pretty much the point I was trying to bring up YT. A President, while being respected should always be questioned regardless of party. So yes, I've been turned off by this Rock Star mentality because quite frankly there is nothing to cheer about yet.

Please don't compare Obama to Washington.
post #68 of 126
Quote:
Originally Posted by yt View Post

The Closer, you don't have to shovel rain out of your driveway every morning!
I live in a condo so I dont have that problem.

With snow, I dont have to carry an umbrella when I walk to work. Plus, with snow on the ground there is always something to pick up and throw at those who believe in Keynesian economics.
post #69 of 126
Quote:
Originally Posted by yt View Post
he ordered the closing of Gitmo and foreign black sites
You know what's so great about closing foreign black sites?

Even if you don't close them, people wont know!
post #70 of 126
Quote:
Originally Posted by yt View Post
I and most people who are supporting Obama are very critical of him, in spite of his willingness to roll up his sleeves and get to work. For example, I'm very critical of the choice of Geithner and think choice may signal ineffectual financial strategies to deal with the banking crisis, and I didn't love the line in Obama's speech about free trade. Believe me, on the left, people don't fall in line. Everyone is cautiously optimistic though.

And please, if you can name one piece of legislation that Bush signed that primarily benefited the people, as opposed to corporations and the very rich, I'll concede at least that.

Obama has done a lot in his first month. He signed S-Chip, health insurance for kids; he ordered the closing of Gitmo and foreign black sites; he pushed and passed the stimulus package, which I know you have been led to believe is a waste but which I think is at least half exactly what the economy needs to start getting back on his feet; he saved property around national parks from being sacrificed at the altar of the oil companies, and on and on. In just last night's speech alone, the power he gave to the push to improve education was a great sign that he will be prioritizing an issue that is close to the top of my list.

The Closer, you don't have to shovel rain out ofyour driveway every morning!
I'm not a Bush guy, but I immediately think of the Great Lakes Legacy Act (A big deal where I live), the Clean Skies Initiative, and the Amber Alert Act were signed during his presidency. A lot of conservatives would probably also cite No Child Left Behind, but that is a terrible bill that will continue to hurt American education. I hope Obama gets rid of it.

As for Obama, http://www.reuters.com/article/newsO...090225?sp=true

The stimulus package is a waste, but for different reasons than the ones coming from typical Republican talking points. There needs to be more infrastructure spending, period. More money pumped into roads, bridges, and railway systems. I would get into more detail why I think the bill is a failure as is, but I've got crim law in an hour.
post #71 of 126
Quote:
Originally Posted by Richard Dickson View Post
Took care of that for ya.
Didn't say it was good stuff, did I?
post #72 of 126
Quote:
Originally Posted by Muharulz View Post

The stimulus package is a waste, but for different reasons than the ones coming from typical Republican talking points. There needs to be more infrastructure spending, period. More money pumped into roads, bridges, and railway systems. I would get into more detail why I think the bill is a failure as is, but I've got crim law in an hour.
There is a difference between creating jobs and creating wealth/value. That is my biggest gripe with the stimulus.

Apparently, its the CBOs biggest gripe as well.
post #73 of 126
Quote:
Originally Posted by Litmus Configuration View Post
I don't think that was the real Jindal. That was clearly Johnny Cab.
That might explain how he got elected...

"The door opened. You got in."
post #74 of 126
Joe Biden;

"You know the website number?"
http://wbztv.com/video/?id=73411@wbz.dayport.com

I guess he was asking for the IP number? Funny, reminds me of the ad they ran against McCain for supposedly not knowing how to use computers/internet.
post #75 of 126
Quote:
Originally Posted by Richard Dickson View Post
I want to tie Jindal's hands to his sides and see if he can still talk.
The man was in serious need of some "Jai Ho."
post #76 of 126
Quote:
Originally Posted by Richard Dickson View Post
I want to tie Jindal's hands to his sides and see if he can still talk.
I'd like to tie Rachel Maddow to a bed and make her talk...

Quote:
Originally Posted by ElCapitanAmerica View Post
Joe Biden;

"You know the website number?"
http://wbztv.com/video/?id=73411@wbz.dayport.com

I guess he was asking for the IP number? Funny, reminds me of the ad they ran against McCain for supposedly not knowing how to use computers/internet.
How hard can it be? It's a series of tubes!
post #77 of 126
What's the website number for CHUD?
post #78 of 126
Quote:
Originally Posted by ElCapitanAmerica View Post
What's the website number for CHUD?

867.5309?
post #79 of 126
Or 208.69.126.70
post #80 of 126
http://apnews.myway.com/article/20090225/D96IFSC80.html

Quote:
WASHINGTON (AP) - President Barack Obama knows Americans are unhappy that the government could rescue people who bought mansions beyond their means.

But his assurance Tuesday night that only the deserving will get help rang hollow.

Even officials in his administration, many supporters of the plan in Congress and the Federal Reserve chairman expect some of that money will go to people who used lousy judgment.

The president skipped over several complex economic circumstances in his speech to Congress - and may have started an international debate among trivia lovers and auto buffs over what country invented the car.

A look at some of his assertions:


OBAMA: "We have launched a housing plan that will help responsible families facing the threat of foreclosure lower their monthly payments and refinance their mortgages. It's a plan that won't help speculators or that neighbor down the street who bought a house he could never hope to afford, but it will help millions of Americans who are struggling with declining home values."

THE FACTS: If the administration has come up with a way to ensure money only goes to those who got in honest trouble, it hasn't said so.

Defending the program Tuesday at a Senate hearing, Federal Reserve Chairman Ben Bernanke said it's important to save those who made bad calls, for the greater good. He likened it to calling the fire department to put out a blaze caused by someone smoking in bed.

"I think the smart way to deal with a situation like that is to put out the fire, save him from his own consequences of his own action but then, going forward, enact penalties and set tougher rules about smoking in bed."

Similarly, the head of the Federal Deposit Insurance Corp. suggested this month it's not likely aid will be denied to all homeowners who overstated their income or assets to get a mortgage they couldn't afford.

"I think it's just simply impractical to try to do a forensic analysis of each and every one of these delinquent loans," Sheila Bair told National Public Radio.

---

OBAMA: "We have known for decades that our survival depends on finding new sources of energy. Yet we import more oil today than ever before."

THE FACTS: Oil imports peaked in 2005 at just over 5 billion barrels, and have been declining slightly since. The figure in 2007 was 4.9 billion barrels, or about 58 percent of total consumption. The nation is on pace this year to import 4.7 billion barrels, and government projections are for imports to hold steady or decrease a bit over the next two decades.

---

OBAMA: "We have already identified $2 trillion in savings over the next decade."

THE FACTS: Although 10-year projections are common in government, they don't mean much. And at times, they are a way for a president to pass on the most painful steps to his successor, by putting off big tax increases or spending cuts until someone else is in the White House.

Obama only has a real say on spending during the four years of his term. He may not be president after that and he certainly won't be 10 years from now.

---

OBAMA: "Regulations were gutted for the sake of a quick profit at the expense of a healthy market. People bought homes they knew they couldn't afford from banks and lenders who pushed those bad loans anyway. And all the while, critical debates and difficult decisions were put off for some other time on some other day."

THE FACTS: This may be so, but it isn't only Republicans who pushed for deregulation of the financial industries. The Clinton administration championed an easing of banking regulations, including legislation that ended the barrier between regular banks and Wall Street banks. That led to a deregulation that kept regular banks under tight federal regulation but extended lax regulation of Wall Street banks. Clinton Treasury Secretary Robert Rubin, later an economic adviser to candidate Obama, was in the forefront in pushing for this deregulation.

---

OBAMA: "In this budget, we will end education programs that don't work and end direct payments to large agribusinesses that don't need them. We'll eliminate the no-bid contracts that have wasted billions in Iraq, and reform our defense budget so that we're not paying for Cold War-era weapons systems we don't use. We will root out the waste, fraud and abuse in our Medicare program that doesn't make our seniors any healthier, and we will restore a sense of fairness and balance to our tax code by finally ending the tax breaks for corporations that ship our jobs overseas."

THE FACTS: First, his budget does not accomplish any of that. It only proposes those steps. That's all a president can do, because control over spending rests with Congress. Obama's proposals here are a wish list and some items, including corporate tax increases and cuts in agricultural aid, will be a tough sale in Congress.

Second, waste, fraud and abuse are routinely targeted by presidents who later find that the savings realized seldom amount to significant sums. Programs that a president might consider wasteful have staunch defenders in Congress who have fought off similar efforts in the past.

---

OBAMA: "Thanks to our recovery plan, we will double this nation's supply of renewable energy in the next three years."

THE FACTS: While the president's stimulus package includes billions in aid for renewable energy and conservation, his goal is unlikely to be achieved through the recovery plan alone.

In 2007, the U.S. produced 8.4 percent of its electricity from renewable sources, including hydroelectric dams, solar panels and windmills. Under the status quo, the Energy Department says, it will take more than two decades to boost that figure to 12.5 percent.

If Obama is to achieve his much more ambitious goal, Congress would need to mandate it. That is the thrust of an energy bill that is expected to be introduced in coming weeks.

---

OBAMA: "Over the next two years, this plan will save or create 3.5 million jobs."

THE FACTS: This is a recurrent Obama formulation. But job creation projections are uncertain even in stable times, and some of the economists relied on by Obama in making his forecast acknowledge a great deal of uncertainty in their numbers.

The president's own economists, in a report prepared last month, stated, "It should be understood that all of the estimates presented in this memo are subject to significant margins of error."

Beyond that, it's unlikely the nation will ever know how many jobs are saved as a result of the stimulus. While it's clear when jobs are abolished, there's no economic gauge that tracks job preservation. The estimates are based on economic assumptions of how many jobs would be lost without the stimulus.
Also, the markets are tanking this morning after a nice rally yesterday when Berneke lied to placate the masses.
post #81 of 126
Quote:
Originally Posted by Snaieke View Post
Also, the markets are tanking this morning after a nice rally yesterday when Berneke lied to placate the masses.

<Snaieke rubs his hands together, snickers, and twirls his mustache>
post #82 of 126
You remember at the VP debates where Palin really folksied it up? That was Jindal last night. Somebody should fire whoever told Jindal to dumb down his cadence and delivery. He came across as a guy trying to explain how to tie your shoes last night rather than the intelligent guy he is. If that Jindal showed up last night, we'd be having a different conversation today. I'm starting to wonder who the Republican party is going to choose as the responder to Obama's State of the Union. Any guesses? My prediction is Michael Steele. My out there prediction is someone from the talk radio circuit. We'll see.
post #83 of 126
Quote:
Originally Posted by pervis42 View Post
Obama: references the civil war, the great depression, and WWII as examples of U.S. know-how and resilience.

Jindal: 9/11. Suck my dick, I'm a shark.
Jindal referenced the same exact things btw. I guess you were distracted by his awful intonation and hypnotic hand movements.
post #84 of 126
LOL to Bobby Jindal the NBC page.

His response was typical for a conservative Republican, in that it was a "FIRE BAD!" philosophy towards government. Never mind that fire cooks food, heats your home and turns the engine in your car. The Republicans are stuck in an ideological tailspin. The only thing that is going to save them is the party in power imploding. Why do all these "I hate government" people want federal gov't jobs, anyways?

As for the real speech, great stuff. I think we really need leaders to exercise their soft power on personal responsibility, especially wrt education. Obama makes knowledge, book smarts and civic duty cool again and you can't underestimate the power of that. And it's important because we have a political party (and, frankly, a culture here in this country) that disdains smart people and glorifies ignorance. And because without Obama, we have Sarah Palin mocking fruit fly research into autism even though it was responsible for the biggest breakthrough in autism medicine in years.

On the Pelosi tip, yeah, she's annoying, but I sorta like that she's such a fangirl of the President. That means good things for him (and hopefully for us by proxy.)
post #85 of 126
Quote:
Originally Posted by ElCapitanAmerica View Post
Jindal referenced the same exact things btw. I guess you were distracted by his awful intonation and hypnotic hand movements.
Well, that's true. After using hurricane Katrina as a reason that government doesn't work, I stopped paying attention to the content of Jindal's speech and tried my best to come up with a Wonkette-esque meme for him.
post #86 of 126
Don't hate me, but Jindal reminded me of Al Gore and Jimmy Carter in his response last night.
post #87 of 126
Southern accent?
post #88 of 126
Quote:
Originally Posted by ElCapitanAmerica View Post
Southern accent?
No, not just that. But the droning, condescending tone of his address--as if he were speaking to a bunch of toddlers.

Vaguely Carter, but a lot like Al Gore. Getting through a Gore speech or a documentary calls for more patience and interest than I can ever manage to muster up.

But unlike Gore, Jindal's words were hollow and empty, and he had no message other than, "government fails. Let's do nothing." Out of touch with the pulse of the country right now, and totally inappropriate.
post #89 of 126
Quote:
Originally Posted by Muharulz View Post
I'm not a Bush guy, but I immediately think of the Great Lakes Legacy Act (A big deal where I live), the Clean Skies Initiative, and the Amber Alert Act were signed during his presidency. A lot of conservatives would probably also cite No Child Left Behind, but that is a terrible bill that will continue to hurt American education. I hope Obama gets rid of it.
I'll give you Amber Alert, but GLLA was largely symbolic (evidently his budget didn't follow through with his intent) and Orwellian Clean Skies Initiative and NCLB are corporate giveaways (and having seen NCLB in action I agree that it's an EPIC FAIL):
Quote:
The Clean Air Act of 1970 has made skies over most cities cleaner by cutting back pollution let out by major power companies. However, the Clean Skies Initiative allows power plants to emit more than five times more mercury, twice as much sulfur dioxide, and over one and a half times more nitrogen oxides than the Clean Air Act.Source.
Quote:
The architect of No Child Left Behind (NCLB), President Bush’s first senior education advisor, Sandy Kress, has turned the program, which has consistently proven disastrous in the realm of education, into a huge success in the realm of corporate profiteering. After ushering NCLB through the US House of Representatives in 2001 with no public hearings, Kress went from lawmaker—turning on spigots of federal funds—to lobbyist, tapping into those billions of dollars in federal funds for private investors well connected to the Bush administration. Source.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Muharulz View Post
Did you happen to see the Gitmo guard who appeared on Rachel Maddow? His message about the culture of abuse at Gitmo was powerful. It's here. I don't think you can pin this on Obama. I mean, what are you saying? We should keep it open so the sadistic among the guards can't "get their last kicks in"?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Muharulz View Post
The stimulus package is a waste, but for different reasons than the ones coming from typical Republican talking points. There needs to be more infrastructure spending, period. More money pumped into roads, bridges, and railway systems. I would get into more detail why I think the bill is a failure as is, but I've got crim law in an hour.
I actually agree with you 100% on this one, but I don't think it's a total failure - I think it's a start. The infrastructure spending in the bill is paltry compared to what's needed. But judging from the resistance he's getting from dead world Republicans, it was probably the best he could hope to do at this point. But I think Krugman's got it right.
post #90 of 126
Bobby Jindal = Kenneth

post #91 of 126
Quote:
Originally Posted by Snaieke View Post
Also, the markets are tanking this morning after a nice rally yesterday when Berneke lied to placate the masses.
Don't mean to harp on this, but I find it hilarious that Drudge did this same exact thing today. Early, when the market was down, Drudge shows the graph and the headline read "Was It Something He Said?". Later, when the graph was back up, Drudge's headline simply said "Stocks Rebound". At the end of the day, though, the market closed down 80 points, and Drudge is back with the sinister "Was It Something He Said?" headline.

Sheesh.

I don't want Obama to "win over" people like Snaieke, or Drudge, or Cheney and Rove for that matter. Stay on your own side, guys. You deserve each other.
post #92 of 126
Quote:
Originally Posted by BrianM View Post
Bobby Jindal = Kenneth

When was the last time morphing was funny, 1991?
post #93 of 126
Someone that think the S&P 500 or the DOW is now much a company is worth, what a laugh. There are too many perfectly good companie that are failing becaue of this. The Tribuine company is just one example. Companies, fueled by idiots money gambled and lost because of it.
post #94 of 126
Was listening to some talk radio today to get a pulse on what the fringe on the right thought of the speech. Some of the bullet points....

Apparently Obama instilled some of the same depression in Republicans that Palin did in the Dems when she spoke at the RNC. As in "Man this guy is good. He's really good. Fuck me."

I've heard the phrase "This guy is dangerous for America" several times. Mainly due to Obama selling a progressive platform to middle America in a palatable way.

Mortification at Jindell's performance is truly bipartisan. The wrinkle is that they thought the ideas in the speech were fine but the delivery was horrible. Jindal is still the darling of talk radio so expect him to stay viable.

Now I gotta take a shower.
post #95 of 126
I'm curious, what shows did you listen to?
post #96 of 126
Dennis Praeger, Michael Medved and Hugh Hewitt. By far not the worst out there but it's as far on the ideological dial as I'm willing to go.
post #97 of 126
Heh ... that's the "liberal wing" of conservative talk radio.

Report to us when you go through Hannity, Limbaugh and Savage (he's off in his own category, btw).
post #98 of 126
The ditto-heads had their marching orders today evidently because they called the lefty shows en masse to say a) two years of "democrat" majorities in congress caused the meltdown, and b) the "better" way to solve the economic crisis is tax cuts. They also said what the talking heads on the shows Dynamotv listened to: Jindal's message was "right" even if his delivery was bad.
post #99 of 126
Quote:
Originally Posted by ElCapitanAmerica View Post
Heh ... that's the "liberal wing" of conservative talk radio.

Report to us when you go through Hannity, Limbaugh and Savage (he's off in his own category, btw).
Yeah the Salem Radio Network guys are weak sauce compared to that Holy Trinity of talk radio but they're still annoying. Still that's all I can take of talk radio. How about you check in with those guys? Take one for the team.
post #100 of 126
I can't take any Hannity and Limbaugh. I used to have a long drive to work every week (more than 2 hours), and I would listen to Savage. He's the craziest of that group, but somehow I find him more entertaining. Maybe because he's so crazy? Not sure ...
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:
  Return Home
  Back to Forum: Political Discourse
CHUD.com Community › Forums › POLITICS & RELIGION › Political Discourse › President Obama's Address to the Nation/Congress Feb 24 2009