Quote:
Originally Posted by Anderson 
I wanted better reasoning.
|
Lau Kar-Leung's 36TH CHAMBER OF SHAOLIN is owed an enormous debt by just about every action film made afterwards that has placed a heavy emphasis on unorthodox training methods. I can't imagine what KARATE KID or ROCKY IV would have looked like had this film not been made... never mind the hundreds of Hong Kong, Korean, and Taiwanese imitators that it spawned.
The vast majority of the film's action is training, with no villain to be neutralized, only puzzles to be solved or skill sets to be mastered. While it was in production with an unknown star, Gordon Liu (who debuted his signature bald-headed look in this film), there was a lot of doubt as to whether or not audiences would be engaged by a film that revolved so heavily around a man's internal conflict rather than his ability to take out scores of enemy fighters singlehandedly. To master the Shaolin disciplines, he must temper his obsession with avenging his family, which is what led him to the temple in the first place. He learns to channel his anger in a more constructive direction - as a teacher motivated by a desire to help people defend themselves against oppressors so they don't have to suffer as he did,
not as a direct agent of vengeance. This was A Big Deal At The Time, nearly as offbeat as Lau's decision to make a China vs Japan martial arts film where
nobody dies with the later HEROES OF THE EAST.
There are martial arts films where people use kung fu to solve whatever conflicts the story presents them with - think POLICE STORY. Then there are films that are inexorably
about martial arts - remove the martial arts from the film and you remove everything. You could take the martial arts out of POLICE STORY without changing the story much at all. You can't do that with 36TH CHAMBER OF SHAOLIN, where the martial arts training changes the protagonist in ways beyond increasing his ability to kick lots of ass. Is Jackie Chan's character substantially changed by the events of POLICE STORY? Heavens, no. But here, Gordon Liu is completely transformed by his experiences in the Shaolin chambers - even his
name changes by film's end.
Cinematographer Arthur Wong provides some of the strongest work of his career on this film. Each shot is beautifully composed, and usually there is a
second perfectly composed shot hidden within the first, as quick zooms are often used to replace traditional edits here - but never carelessly, and almost never as a substitute for dollying the camera, as is often the case on lesser kung fu films; in 36TH CHAMBER Wong's camera is plenty mobile. In a genre often plagued by sloppy camerawork, this film's visuals are downright meticulous. There aren't many films that use the "scope" frame as well as this one does - it'd be nearly impossible to pan & scan something visually coherent out of Wong's careful, frame-filling compositions.
This is a highly influential film that is very well made, with a strong main character the viewer can relate to, who grows and matures before our eyes in a genre not known for such things. It provided the starting point for one of kung fu filmmaking's internationally recognized stars, and established Lau Kar-Leung as a very talented director, not just an expert choreographer. One of Hong Kong's best cinematographers does some of his most impressive work on it, nearly doing double duty as editor thanks to the heavy use of zooms in place of cuts. Lau was very lucky to have a supportive producer in Mona Fong, who didn't put her foot down to restrain Lau's experiments in genre-tweaking (here and in other films) when she could have easily done so. 36TH CHAMBER OF SHAOLIN is
eminently worthy, and amazingly the currently available US release is definitive, one of the handful of Dragon Dynasty discs that's not fucked up in any way.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Marlowe's Cat 
So, if Criterion really wanted to rectify its lack of non-Japanese Asian films, Comrades, Almost A Love Story would be, in my humble estimation, a great starting point.
|
They don't, sadly.